본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영한 번역과정에 나타난 외축의 명시화: 비대칭 ‘and’ 접속 구문의 화용의미 분석

Explicitation of Explicatures in English-to-Korean Translation Process: A Pragmatic Analysis of Asymmetric ‘and’ Conjunction

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

This paper is concerned with how explicatures in a source text are translated in its corresponding target text. It will show that in translation process, explicatures of ‘and’ conjunction utterances in a source text have a strong statistical tendency to be explicated in their corresponding Korean target texts. The results are on the par with the spirit of Sperber and Wilson’s (1986) position on the nature of explicature and Carston’s subsequent study (2002) on that of ‘and’ conjunction. This study is based the explicitation hypothesis proposed by Blum-Kulka (1986/2001) and has investigated two translated Korean texts of American English novel The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger to see how the explicatures of English asymmetric 'and' conjunction utterances have been translated in them. Both of the translated texts are found to have a strong statistical tendency of the explicitation of the explicatures of ‘and’ conjunction. It supports the Relevance theoretic position that explicatures communicated by utterances are explicit.

Abstract

This paper is concerned with how explicatures in a source text are translated in its corresponding target text. It will show that in translation process, explicatures of ‘and’ conjunction utterances in a source text have a strong statistical tendency to be explicated in their corresponding Korean target texts. The results are on the par with the spirit of Sperber and Wilson’s (1986) position on the nature of explicature and Carston’s subsequent study (2002) on that of ‘and’ conjunction. This study is based the explicitation hypothesis proposed by Blum-Kulka (1986/2001) and has investigated two translated Korean texts of American English novel The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger to see how the explicatures of English asymmetric 'and' conjunction utterances have been translated in them. Both of the translated texts are found to have a strong statistical tendency of the explicitation of the explicatures of ‘and’ conjunction. It supports the Relevance theoretic position that explicatures communicated by utterances are explicit.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 국지연, "'말해진 것'의 명시의미: 적합성이론 분석", 담화와 인지, 14(2), pp.1~25 (2007), 담화·인지언어학회
  2. 송영, "부랑일기" (2008), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
  3. 신지선, "아동문학 번역에서의 명시화 전략" (2010), 이화여자대학교
  4. 조의연, "인지의미론에서 본 영어 상호-사건 관계 ‘and’ 접속구문: 진정한 등위접속인가?", 담화와 인지, 10(2), pp.177~195 (2003), 담화·인지언어학회
  5. Bach,Kent, "Impliciture vs. explicature: What's the difference?", Paper delivered at the Workshop on “Explicit Communication” (2006)
  6. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, "Shifts of cohesion and coherence in translation.’ First published in Juliane House and Shoshana Blum-Kulka (eds.) 1986. Interlingual and Intercultural Communication. Discourse and cognition in translation and second language acquisition, 17-35.", The Translation Studies Reader, 298~313 (2001)
  7. Carston,Robyn, "Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication" (2002), Blackwell
  8. Implicating Distinction In Handbook of Pragmatics, "Relevance Theory and the Saying", pp.2006, Carston,Robyn
  9. Eskola,Sari, "Untypical frequencies in translated language. A corpus-based study on a literary corpus of translated and non-translated Finnish In Translation Universals. Do they exist?", pp.83~100 (2004), John Benjamins
  10. Grice,Paul, "Logic and conversation In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
  11. Gutt,Ernst-August, "Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context" (1991), Blackwell
  12. Gutt,Ernst-August, "On the Nature and treatment of implicit information in literary translation: A Relevance-theoretic perspective", International Journal of Translation Studies, 8, pp.241~256 (1996)
  13. Kempson, Ruth, "Mental Representations: the Interface between Language and Reality" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  14. Papai,Vilma, "Explicitation. A universal of translated text? In Translation Universals. Do they exist?", pp.143~164 (2004), John Benjamins
  15. Pym,Anthony, "Explaining explicitation In New Trends in Translation Studies in Honour of Kinga Klaudy" (2005), Akademiai Kiado
  16. Recanati,Francois, "The Pragmatics of what is said In Pragmatics: A Reader", pp.97~120 (1991), Oxford University Press
  17. Recanati,Francois, "Literal Meaning" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  18. Sperber, Dan, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1995), Harvard University Press
  19. Sperber, Dan, "Relevance Theory In Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.607~632 (2006), Blackwell
  20. Viany, Jean-Paul, "Comparative stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for translation" (1958), John Benjamins
  21. Zhonggang,Sang, "A Relevance theory perspective on translating the implicit information in literary texts", Journal of Translation, 2(2), pp.43~60 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)