번역가의 문체선택 연구: 호밀밭의 파수꾼 번역텍스트 비교분석
A Study of Translator’s Choice of Stylistic Features: Two Translations of J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye
3
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on the method of translational stylistics put forward by Malmkjær (2004), this paper gives a stylistic analysis of two translations of the American English novel The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger. For this purpose, the basic assumption taken in this study is that a translator’s (writing) choice of a word/phrase or structure reflects his or her cognitive state of how he or she views the world or the literary world in his or her cognition, called ‘mind style’ in Fowler(1977). The main focus has been put on how two Korean translations translated the source text's general purpose link conjunction ‘and’ sentences. What has been found is that in the two translated texts, logical connectives such as ‘-아서’(then, because) ‘-아’(then, because) ‘-는데’(background) and ‘-면서’(during) are dominantly used in the place of the English ‘and’ conjunction whose function is known to be a general purpose link, being different from those logical connectives such as ‘therefore’ and ‘so.’ The statistical result of this paper shows that the style of the two translated texts of using those logical connectives runs against the trend of modern novels which use few logical connectives as attested in J. Joyce’s Ulysses (Leech and Short 1981/2007). Although the two translated texts are not much different from each other in terms of the frequency of logical connectives, one of them, TT2 in this study appears to have used noticeable numbers of two juxtaposed sentences without any connective. Since the ‘zero (ø) connective’ took the fourth in the frequency of the connectives used in TT2, it has been taken as a style marker and given a stylistic analysis in this paper.
Abstract
Based on the method of translational stylistics put forward by Malmkjær (2004), this paper gives a stylistic analysis of two translations of the American English novel The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger. For this purpose, the basic assumption taken in this study is that a translator’s (writing) choice of a word/phrase or structure reflects his or her cognitive state of how he or she views the world or the literary world in his or her cognition, called ‘mind style’ in Fowler(1977). The main focus has been put on how two Korean translations translated the source text's general purpose link conjunction ‘and’ sentences. What has been found is that in the two translated texts, logical connectives such as ‘-아서’(then, because) ‘-아’(then, because) ‘-는데’(background) and ‘-면서’(during) are dominantly used in the place of the English ‘and’ conjunction whose function is known to be a general purpose link, being different from those logical connectives such as ‘therefore’ and ‘so.’ The statistical result of this paper shows that the style of the two translated texts of using those logical connectives runs against the trend of modern novels which use few logical connectives as attested in J. Joyce’s Ulysses (Leech and Short 1981/2007). Although the two translated texts are not much different from each other in terms of the frequency of logical connectives, one of them, TT2 in this study appears to have used noticeable numbers of two juxtaposed sentences without any connective. Since the ‘zero (ø) connective’ took the fourth in the frequency of the connectives used in TT2, it has been taken as a style marker and given a stylistic analysis in this paper.
참고문헌 (26)
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사, "국립국어연구원", 국립국어연구원, ~ (2002)
- 국립국어연구원, "21세기 세종계획 최종 성과물 ‘전자 사전’" (2010), 국립국어연구원
- 김순영, "｢대성당｣ 번역본의 문체적 특성 고찰", 번역학연구, 13(1), pp.33~58 (2012), 한국번역학회
- "언어와 언어학", 1982, 53~74
- 이은경, "접속어미의 통사, In 문법 연구와 자료", pp.463~489 (1998), 태학사
- 이희자, "한국어 학습 전문가용 어미.조사 사전" (2010), 한국문화사
- 정수진, "연결어미 ‘-어서’의 의미 확장에 대한 인지언어학적 접근", 국어교육연구, (50), pp.405~428 (2012), 국어교육학회(since1969)
- 조의연, "인지의미론에서 본 영어 상호-사건 관계 ‘and’ 접속구문: 진정한 등위접속인가?", 담화와 인지, 10(2), pp.177~195 (2003), 담화·인지언어학회
- 조의연, "영한 번역과정에 나타난 외축의 명시화: 비대칭 ‘and’ 접속 구문의 화용의미 분석", 번역학연구, 12(2), pp.185~206 (2011), 한국번역학회
- 황도경, "문체로 읽는 소설" (2002), 소명출판
- Boase-Beier, J, "Stylistic Approaches to Translation" (2006), St. Jerome Publishing
- Boase-Beier, J, "A Critical Introduction to Translation Studies" (2011), Continuum International Publishing Group
- Bosseaux, C, "How Does It Feel: Point of View in Translation" (2007), Rodopi
- Fowler, R, "Linguistics and the Novel" (1977), Methuen
- Grice, P, "Logic and conversation, In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Gutt, E.-A, "Translation and Relevance (2nd edition)" (2000), St. Jerome Publishing
- Leech, G, "Style in Fiction" (2007), Longman
- Malmkjær, K, "Translational stylistics: Dullcken’s translations of Hans Christian Andersen", Language and Literature, 13(1), pp.13~24 (2004)
- Malmkjær, K, "Stylistics, In The Linguistics Encyclopedia, 2nd ed", pp.510~520 (2002), Routledge
- Munday, J, "Style and Ideology in Translation: Latin American Writing in English" (2008), Routledge
- Murphy, T, "Levels of style in narrative fiction", Situations, 5, pp.48~68 (2011), Yonsei University
- Semino, E, "Mind style 25 years on", Style, 41(2), pp.153~203 (2007)
- J.D. Salinger, "The Catcher in the Rye" (1951), Penguin
- 이덕형, "호밀밭의 파수꾼" (1985), 문예출판사
- 김욱동, "호밀밭의 파수꾼" (1994), 현암사