번역의 방향과 접속 부가어의 의미
Directionality of Translation and the Meanings of Conjunctive Adjuncts
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is 1) to analyse and compare formal semantic correspondences between English-into-Korean and Korean-into-English translations, 2) to analyse sub-semantic correspondences in both directions, and 3) to examine ellipsis of conjunctive adjuncts in the semantic perspective. Specifically via a study employing a newly built 31,022-word EXCEL-based parallel corpus, it is shown that the pair of ‘But’ and ‘Geureona’, which is a typical adversative Korean conjunctive adjunct, shows the similar formal correspondence rate in both directions and their sub-semantics represents the closest patterning. On the contrary, although the pairs of ‘And’ and ‘Geureonde’ and ‘Then’ and ‘Geurigo’ show the similar formal correspondence rates in both translation directions, their sub-semantic patterns and their correspondences are not identical. In addition, it has been found that the ellipsis rates of ‘And’ and ‘Geurigo’ are highest when ‘And’ signifies “simple additive” and ‘Geurigo’ represents “additive (cheomga), enumerative (nayeol), contrastive (daejo)”.
Abstract
This paper is 1) to analyse and compare formal semantic correspondences between English-into-Korean and Korean-into-English translations, 2) to analyse sub-semantic correspondences in both directions, and 3) to examine ellipsis of conjunctive adjuncts in the semantic perspective. Specifically via a study employing a newly built 31,022-word EXCEL-based parallel corpus, it is shown that the pair of ‘But’ and ‘Geureona’, which is a typical adversative Korean conjunctive adjunct, shows the similar formal correspondence rate in both directions and their sub-semantics represents the closest patterning. On the contrary, although the pairs of ‘And’ and ‘Geureonde’ and ‘Then’ and ‘Geurigo’ show the similar formal correspondence rates in both translation directions, their sub-semantic patterns and their correspondences are not identical. In addition, it has been found that the ellipsis rates of ‘And’ and ‘Geurigo’ are highest when ‘And’ signifies “simple additive” and ‘Geurigo’ represents “additive (cheomga), enumerative (nayeol), contrastive (daejo)”.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강범모, "한국어의 텍스트 장르와 언어 특성" (2002), 고려대학교 출판부
- 강범모, "언어 기술을 위한 코퍼스의 구축과 빈도(통계) 활용", 한국사전학, (12), pp.7~40 (2008), 한국사전학회
- 강범모, "한국어 사용빈도" (2009), 한국 문화사
- 김흥규, "한·영 병렬코퍼스의 설계 · 구축 및 응용 방안 연구", 한국어학, 11, pp.23~71 (2000)
- 김도훈, "영한 번역에서 나타나는 문장 부호의 변이 양상 및 번역전략에 관한 연구: Colon, Dash, Semicolon을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2008
- 김미선, "접속부사의 텍스트언어학적 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2001
- 김미선, "말뭉치 분석을 통한 접속부사의 결속 단위 고찰", 한국어학, 34, pp.141~167 (2007), 한국어학회
- 손남익, "국어 원형성 연구", 우리어문연구, (25), pp.317~340 (2005), 우리어문학회
- 신지연, "단락 경계에서의 ‘그러나’의 의미 기능", 텍스트언어학, (19), pp.83~107 (2005), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 장기열, "국어 접속부사의 특성과 그 기능", 복지행정연구, 19, pp.175~194 (2003)
- 차윤정, "‘그리고’의 의미적 특성", 우리말 연구, 12, pp.49~69 (2002)
- 최재희, "국어의 접속문 구성 연구" (1991), 탑 출판사
- 최진실, "접속 부가어의 영한 번역 연구", 박사, 영어영문학과, pp.2010
- Abdul-Fattah, Ashraf, "A Corpus-based Study of Conjunctive Explicitation in Arabic Translated and Non-translated Texts Written by the Same Translators", Authors, The University of Manchester, 2010
- Blakemore,Diane, "Understanding Utterances" (1992), Blackwell
- Cheong,Ho-Jeong, "Target Text Contraction in English-into-Korean Translations: A Contraction of Presumed Translation Universals?", Translators’ Journal, 51(2), pp.343~367 (2006)
- Do,Anna, "Contrastive Discourse Markers: An Examination of Their Characteristics in Korean", 박사, pp.2006
- Dorgeloh,Heidrun, "Conjunction in Sentence and Discourse: Sentence-Initial ‘and’ and Discourse Structure", Journal of Pragmatics, 36, pp.1761~1779 (2004)
- Fraser,Bruce, "An Account of Discourse Markers In Current Trends in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics", pp.13~34 (2004), Universidad de Sevilla
- Halliday, Michael, "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
- Halliday, Michael, "An Introduction to Functional Grammar" (2004), Hodder Arnold
- Hatim, Basil, "Discourse and the Translator" (1990), Longman
- Koo,Yu-Son, "Contrastive Discourse Markers in English and Korean", The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, 8(1), pp.445~446 (2000)
- Louwerse,Max, "An Analytic and Cognitive Analytic and Cognitive Parameterization of Coherence Relations", Cognitive Linguistics, 12, pp.291~315 (2002)
- Mason,Ian, "Discourse Connectives, Ellipsis and Markedness In The Pragmatics of Translation", pp.170~184 (1998), Multilingual Matters Ltd
- Putu Nur Ayomi, S, "Explicitation of Conjunctive Relation in English-Indonesian Translation: A Corpus-Based Study", Linguistik, 17(17) (2010)
- Sanz,Rosa, "The Translation of Tourist Literature: the Case of Connectors", Multilingua, 22, pp.291~308 (2003)
- Xiao, Richard, "Using Corpora in Translation Studies: the State of the Art in Contemporary Corpus Linguistics", pp.237~262 (2009), Continuum
- Xiao,Richard, "How Different is Translated Chinese from Native Chinese?: A Corpus-Based Study of Translation Universals", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(1), pp.5~35 (2010)