본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중한 출판번역에서 나타난 다시쓰기 형태

Forms of Rewriting in Chinese-Korean Translation for Publication

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

Translation is the product of rewriting. Considering acceptability of the text to the target audience, rewriting is a feature of the translation process from the selection of the source text till the finished book reaches the readers’ hands. This paper analyzes Korean-Chinese translated publications that have gone through this process of rewriting to identify characteristics in the form of those publications when compared to the original text, and to identify the differences in form and their causes. Through comparison and analysis of 21 translated publications including Nunmul 1 (Tears I) and 13 original Chinese texts including Binu (碧奴), differences of form were identified and organized according to type. According to analysis of the differences, the major forms of rewriting appearing in Chinese-Korean translated publications are 1) publication of one book in two (or more) volumes 2) omission, 3) creativity on the part of the translator in dealing with the signifiant and 4) cases of re-editing according to the formation of the genre of a particular text in each culture. In the broad framework, through publication of one book in multiple volumes to increase acceptability to the target audience, works translated from Chinese to Korean generally become longer than the original text due to linguistic characteristics and book publication practices. These are characteristics generally found in Chinese-Korean translated publications. On the other hand, in the case of omission, for certain translators (Yu So-yeong, Shim Gyu-ho) partial omission resulting in an incomplete translation is carried out on the condition of the author’s prior permission, as specified in the contract. This suggests that active intervention on the part of the translator is not yet common in Korea. In addition, in novels where there is a close relationship between the names and the story active rewriting on the part of the translator is necessary in dealing with signifiant such as the name of the main character. In particular, when there are forms distinct to each culture such as found in dictionaries, rewriting is carried out in such a way as to make the text acceptable to the target culture.

Abstract

Translation is the product of rewriting. Considering acceptability of the text to the target audience, rewriting is a feature of the translation process from the selection of the source text till the finished book reaches the readers’ hands. This paper analyzes Korean-Chinese translated publications that have gone through this process of rewriting to identify characteristics in the form of those publications when compared to the original text, and to identify the differences in form and their causes. Through comparison and analysis of 21 translated publications including Nunmul 1 (Tears I) and 13 original Chinese texts including Binu (碧奴), differences of form were identified and organized according to type. According to analysis of the differences, the major forms of rewriting appearing in Chinese-Korean translated publications are 1) publication of one book in two (or more) volumes 2) omission, 3) creativity on the part of the translator in dealing with the signifiant and 4) cases of re-editing according to the formation of the genre of a particular text in each culture. In the broad framework, through publication of one book in multiple volumes to increase acceptability to the target audience, works translated from Chinese to Korean generally become longer than the original text due to linguistic characteristics and book publication practices. These are characteristics generally found in Chinese-Korean translated publications. On the other hand, in the case of omission, for certain translators (Yu So-yeong, Shim Gyu-ho) partial omission resulting in an incomplete translation is carried out on the condition of the author’s prior permission, as specified in the contract. This suggests that active intervention on the part of the translator is not yet common in Korea. In addition, in novels where there is a close relationship between the names and the story active rewriting on the part of the translator is necessary in dealing with signifiant such as the name of the main character. In particular, when there are forms distinct to each culture such as found in dictionaries, rewriting is carried out in such a way as to make the text acceptable to the target culture.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 김경용, "기호학이란 무엇인가" (2002), 민음사
  2. 김순미, "정보성 차이를 극복하기 위한 효과적 추가 정보 제공 방법 —관련성 이론 중심으로", 번역학연구, 12(1), pp.35~73 (2011), 한국번역학회
  3. Bassnett, Susan, "번역학-이론과 실제" (2004), 한신문화사
  4. 김효중, "새로운 번역을 위한 패러다임" (2004), 푸른세상
  5. 김혜림, "중한 번역물에 대한 독자의 평가 규범 -웨난(岳南) 작품에 대한 비평을 중심으로-", 통역과 번역, 10(2), pp.27~46 (2008), 한국통역번역학회
  6. Wilss, Wolfram, "번역교육입문" (2002), 고려대학교출판부
  7. 김용석, "언어학사전" (2000), 박영사
  8. Israël, Fortunato, "원문과 번역문의 연결고리" (2003)
  9. 전성기, "번역인문학과 번역비평" (2008), 고려대학교 출판부
  10. Munday, Jeremy, "번역학 입문-이론과 적용" (2001), 한국외국어대학교
  11. Chesterman, Andrew, "번역교육입문" (2009), 한국외국어대학교출판부
  12. 정혜욱, "번역과 문화연구" (2010), 경성대학교출판부
  13. 김혜림, "번역학 발전사" (2010), 이화여자대학교 출판부
  14. 朱健平, "翻译:跨文化解释" (2007), 湖南人民出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)