Repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged resin nanoceramics
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To explore the influence of different surface conditionings on surface changes and the influence of surface treatments and aging on the bond strengths of composites to non-aged and aged resin nanoceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Rectangular-shaped non-aged and aged (5000 thermocycles) resin nanoceramic specimens (Lava Ultimate) (n=63, each) were divided into 3 groups according to surface treatments (untreated, air abrasion, or silica coating) (n=21). The surface roughness was measured and scanning electron microscopy was used to examine one specimen from each group. Afterwards, the specimens were repaired with a composite resin (Filtek Z550) and half were sent for aging (5000 thermocycles, n=10, each). Shear bond strengths and failure types were evaluated. Roughness and bond strength were investigated by two- and three-way analysis of variance, respectively. The correlation between the roughness and bond strength was investigated by Pearson’s correlation test. RESULTS. Surface-treated samples had higher roughness compared with the untreated specimens (P=.000). For the non-aged resin nanoceramic groups, aging was a significant factor for bond strength; for the aged resin nanoceramic groups, surface treatment and aging were significant factors. The failures were mostly adhesive after thermal cycling, except in the non-aged untreated group and the aged air-abraded group, which had mostly mixed failures. Roughness and bond strength were positively correlated (P=.003). CONCLUSION. Surface treatment is not required for the repair of non-aged resin nanoceramic; for the repair of aged resin nanoceramic restorations, air abrasion is recommended.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To explore the influence of different surface conditionings on surface changes and the influence of surface treatments and aging on the bond strengths of composites to non-aged and aged resin nanoceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Rectangular-shaped non-aged and aged (5000 thermocycles) resin nanoceramic specimens (Lava Ultimate) (n=63, each) were divided into 3 groups according to surface treatments (untreated, air abrasion, or silica coating) (n=21). The surface roughness was measured and scanning electron microscopy was used to examine one specimen from each group. Afterwards, the specimens were repaired with a composite resin (Filtek Z550) and half were sent for aging (5000 thermocycles, n=10, each). Shear bond strengths and failure types were evaluated. Roughness and bond strength were investigated by two- and three-way analysis of variance, respectively. The correlation between the roughness and bond strength was investigated by Pearson’s correlation test. RESULTS. Surface-treated samples had higher roughness compared with the untreated specimens (P=.000). For the non-aged resin nanoceramic groups, aging was a significant factor for bond strength; for the aged resin nanoceramic groups, surface treatment and aging were significant factors. The failures were mostly adhesive after thermal cycling, except in the non-aged untreated group and the aged air-abraded group, which had mostly mixed failures. Roughness and bond strength were positively correlated (P=.003). CONCLUSION. Surface treatment is not required for the repair of non-aged resin nanoceramic; for the repair of aged resin nanoceramic restorations, air abrasion is recommended.
참고문헌 (30)
- Giordano R, "Materials for chairside CAD", CAM-produced restorations, 2006, pp.137, 14S~21S
- Miyazaki T, "A review of dental CAD", CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience, 2009, pp.28, 44~56
- Kois DE, "Evaluation of fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations", J Esthet Restor Dent, 25, pp.110~122 (2013)
- Zahran M, "Fracture strength and fatigue resistance of all-ceramic molar crowns manufactured with CAD", CAM technology, 2008, pp.17, 370~377
- Sripetchdanond J, "Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin:an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1141~1150 (2014)
- Fasbinder DJ, "Materials for chairside CAD", CAM restorations, 2010, pp.31, 702~704
- Belli R, "Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations", Dent Mater, 30, pp.424~432 (2014)
- Coldea A, "Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials", Dent Mater, 29, pp.419~426 (2013)
- Acar O, "Color stainability of CAD", CAM and nanocomposite resin materials, 2016, pp.115, 71~75
- El-Damanhoury HM, "Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CADCAM blocks", Oper Dent, 40, pp.201~210 (2015)
- Krämer N, "Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays", J Dent Res, 85, pp.1097~1100 (2006)
- Magne P, "Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD", CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars, 2009, pp.40, 125~133
- Mörmann WH, "Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD", CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness, 2013, pp.20, 113~125
- Alt V, "Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD", CAM versus directly fabricated restorations, 2011, pp.27, 339~347
- Ozcan M, "Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs", Int J Prosthodont, 15, pp.299~302 (2002)
- Duzyol M, "The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between CAD", CAM Blocks and Composite Resin, 2016, pp.25, 466~471
- Hickel R, "Repair of restorations-criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations", Dent Mater, 29, pp.28~50 (2013)
- Stawarczyk B, "Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD", CAM resin nanoceramic, 2015, pp.19, 299~308
- Wiegand A, "Repairability of CAD", CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers, 2015, pp.19, 2007~2013
- Merve Bankoğlu Güngör, "Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD", CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials, 2016, pp.8(4), 259~266[DOI]
- Quinn GD, "Chipping fracture resistance of dental CAD", CAM restorative materials: part I-procedures and results, 2014, pp.30, e99~e111
- Ornaghi BP, "Subcritical crack growth and in vitro lifetime prediction of resin composites with different filler distributions", Dent Mater, 28, pp.985~995 (2012)
- Özcan M, "Surface Conditioning and Bonding Protocol for Nanocomposite Indirect Restorations: How and Why?", J Adhes Dent, 18, pp.82~ (2016)
- Amaral M, "The potential of novel primers and universal adhesives to bond to zirconia", J Dent, 42, pp.90~98 (2014)
- Wahsh MM, "Influence of different surface treatments on microshear bond strength of repair resin composite to two CAD", CAM esthetic restorative materials, 2015, pp.12, 178~184
- Palmer DS, "Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.325~327 (1992)
- Elsaka SE, "Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD", CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems, 2015, pp.34, 161~167
- Gale MS, "Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations", J Dent, 27, pp.89~99 (1999)
- Torstenson B, "Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress", Oper Dent, 13, pp.24~31 (1988)
- Bähr N, "Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD", CAM materials, 2013, pp.32, 492~501