Accuracy of several implant bite registration techniques: an in-vitro pilot study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This study evaluated the accuracies of different bite registration techniques for implant-fixed prostheses using three dimensional file analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Implant fixtures were placed on the mandibular right second premolar, and the first and second molar in a polyurethane model. Aluwax (A),Pattern Resin (P), and Blu-Mousse (B) were used as the bite registration materials on the healing abutments (H) or temporary abutments (T). The groups were classified into HA, HP, HB, TA, TP, and TB according to each combination. The group using the bite impression coping was the BC group; impression taking and bite registration were performed simultaneously. After impression and bite taking, the scan bodies were connected to the lab analogs of the casts. These casts were scanned using a model scanner. The distances between two reference points in three-dimensional files were measured in each group. One-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test were used at the 5% significance level. RESULTS. The smallest distance discrepancy was observed in the TB group using the temporary abutments. The Blu-Mousse and HP groups showed the largest distance discrepancy. The TB and BC groups showed a lower distance discrepancy than the HP group (P=.001), and there was no significant difference between the groups using the temporary abutments and healing abutments (P>.05). CONCLUSION. Although this study has limitations as an in-vitro investigation, the groups using the temporary abutments to hold the Blu-Mousse record and bite impression coping showed greater accuracy than the group using the healing abutments to hold the pattern resin record.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This study evaluated the accuracies of different bite registration techniques for implant-fixed prostheses using three dimensional file analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Implant fixtures were placed on the mandibular right second premolar, and the first and second molar in a polyurethane model. Aluwax (A),Pattern Resin (P), and Blu-Mousse (B) were used as the bite registration materials on the healing abutments (H) or temporary abutments (T). The groups were classified into HA, HP, HB, TA, TP, and TB according to each combination. The group using the bite impression coping was the BC group; impression taking and bite registration were performed simultaneously. After impression and bite taking, the scan bodies were connected to the lab analogs of the casts. These casts were scanned using a model scanner. The distances between two reference points in three-dimensional files were measured in each group. One-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test were used at the 5% significance level. RESULTS. The smallest distance discrepancy was observed in the TB group using the temporary abutments. The Blu-Mousse and HP groups showed the largest distance discrepancy. The TB and BC groups showed a lower distance discrepancy than the HP group (P=.001), and there was no significant difference between the groups using the temporary abutments and healing abutments (P>.05). CONCLUSION. Although this study has limitations as an in-vitro investigation, the groups using the temporary abutments to hold the Blu-Mousse record and bite impression coping showed greater accuracy than the group using the healing abutments to hold the pattern resin record.
참고문헌 (33)
- Freilich MA, "Principles for selecting interocclusal records for articulation of dentate and partially dentate casts", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.361~367 (1992)
- Ockert-Eriksson G, "Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.152~158 (2000)
- Anup G, "Evaluation of dimensional stability, accuracy and surface hardness of interocclusal recording materials at various time intervals: an in vitro study", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 11, pp.26~31 (2011)
- Mullick SC, "A study of interocclusal record materials", J Prosthet Dent, 46, pp.304~307 (1981)
- Savabi O, "Interocclusal record for fixed implant-supported prosthesis", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.602~603 (2004)
- Wicks R, "A technique to create an interocclusal bite registration using in situ implant healing abutments", J Tenn Dent Assoc, 93, pp.47~49 (2013)
- Monzavi A, "Occlusal recording components for dental implant-supported prostheses", J Dent (Tehran), 9, pp.76~78 (2012)
- Tejo SK, "A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study", Head Face Med, 8, pp.27~ (2012)
- Chun JH, "Polymerization shrinkage strain of interocclusal recording materials", Dent Mater, 25, pp.115~120 (2009)
- 노지연, "교합인기재의 물성 평가", 대한치과재료학회지, 33(3), pp.301~307 (2006), 대한치과재료학회
- Ghazal M, "Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal recording materials", Quintessence Int, 39, pp.727~732 (2008)
- Gibbs SB, "Comparison of polymerization shrinkage of pattern resins", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.293~298 (2014)
- Müller J, "An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part I: Plaster, impression compound, and wax", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.263~269 (1990)
- Park HY, "An experimental study on the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials", J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 28, pp.91~108 (1990)
- Breeding LC, "Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast", J Prosthet Dent, 71, pp.265~270 (1994)
- 박진영, "Comparison of prosthetic models produced by traditional and additive manufacturing methods", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 7(4), pp.294~302 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Müller J, "Study of the accuracy of different recording materials", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.41~46 (1990)
- Iwaki Y, "Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations", Oper Dent, 38, pp.309~315 (2013)
- Tripodakis AP, "Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 77, pp.141~146 (1997)
- Lee H, "The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 100, pp.285~291 (2008)
- Parker MH, "Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 78, pp.255~259 (1997)
- Lassila V, "Comparison of five interocclusal recording materials", J Prosthet Dent, 55, pp.215~218 (1986)
- Michalakis KX, "An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part II: Linear dimensional change and accompanying weight change", J Prosthodont, 13, pp.150~159 (2004)
- Millstein PL, "Determination of the accuracy of wax interocclusal registrations", J Prosthet Dent, 25, pp.189~196 (1971)
- Vergos VK, "Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.365~368 (2003)
- Ghazal M, "The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension", J Oral Rehabil, 35, pp.816~820 (2008)
- Mojon P, "Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.684~688 (1990)
- Müller J, "An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part II: Polyether, acrylic resin, and corrected wax wafer", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.389~395 (1990)
- Millstein PL, "Differential accuracy of elastomeric recording materials and associated weight change", J Prosthet Dent, 71, pp.400~403 (1994)
- Breeding LC, "Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.876~878 (1992)
- Odman PA, "Accuracy of impression materials in a semi-clinical model", Dent Mater, 4, pp.64~67 (1988)
- Klineberg I, "Occlusion and clinical practice: an evidence-based approach", pp.2004, Wright
- Davies SJ, "Occlusal considerations in periodontics", Br Dent J, 191, pp.597~604 (2001)