본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Repair bond strength of resin composite to three aged CAD/CAM blocks using different repair systems

Pinar Gul|Latife Altinok-Uygun
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy Of Prosthodontics)|2020.06|The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics|제12권 제3호|pp. 131-139|DOI https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.3.131

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Composite resinCAD/CAM materialsIntraoral repair systemsMicrotensile bond strenght

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the repair bond strength of a nanohybrid resin composite to three CAD/CAM blocks using different intraoral ceramic repair systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three CAD/CAM blocks (Lava Ultimate, Cerasmart, and Vitablocks Mark II) were selected for the study. Thirty-two specimens were fabricated from each block. Specimens were randomly divided into eight groups for the following different intraoral repair systems: Group 1: control group (no treatment); Group 2: 34.5% phosphoric acid etching; Group 3: CoJet System; Group 4: Z-Prime Plus System; Group 5: GC Repair System; Group 6: Cimara System; Group 7: Porcelain Repair System; and Group 8: Clearfil Repair System. Then, nanohybrid resin composite (Tetric Evo Ceram) was packed onto treated blocks surfaces. The specimens were thermocycled before application of repair systems and after application of composite resin. After second thermal cycling, blocks were cut into bars (1 × 1 × 12 mm3) for microtensile bond strength tests. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test (α=.05). RESULTS. Cimara System, Porcelain Repair, and Clearfil Repair systems significantly increased the bond strength of nanohybrid resin composite to all CAD/CAM blocks when compared with the other tested repair systems (P<.05). In terms of CAD/CAM blocks, the lowest values were observed in Vitablocks Mark II groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION. All repair systems used in the study exhibited clinically acceptable bond strength and can be recommended for clinical use.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the repair bond strength of a nanohybrid resin composite to three CAD/CAM blocks using different intraoral ceramic repair systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three CAD/CAM blocks (Lava Ultimate, Cerasmart, and Vitablocks Mark II) were selected for the study. Thirty-two specimens were fabricated from each block. Specimens were randomly divided into eight groups for the following different intraoral repair systems: Group 1: control group (no treatment); Group 2: 34.5% phosphoric acid etching; Group 3: CoJet System; Group 4: Z-Prime Plus System; Group 5: GC Repair System; Group 6: Cimara System; Group 7: Porcelain Repair System; and Group 8: Clearfil Repair System. Then, nanohybrid resin composite (Tetric Evo Ceram) was packed onto treated blocks surfaces. The specimens were thermocycled before application of repair systems and after application of composite resin. After second thermal cycling, blocks were cut into bars (1 × 1 × 12 mm3) for microtensile bond strength tests. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test (α=.05). RESULTS. Cimara System, Porcelain Repair, and Clearfil Repair systems significantly increased the bond strength of nanohybrid resin composite to all CAD/CAM blocks when compared with the other tested repair systems (P<.05). In terms of CAD/CAM blocks, the lowest values were observed in Vitablocks Mark II groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION. All repair systems used in the study exhibited clinically acceptable bond strength and can be recommended for clinical use.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. Wendler M, "Chairside CAD", CAM materials. Part 2: Flexural strength testing, 2017, pp.33, 99~109
  2. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, "The effect of surface treatments on the mechanical and optical behaviors of CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2019, pp.28, e496~e503
  3. Blackburn C, "Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD-CAM materials after accelerated aging", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.954~958 (2018)
  4. Coldea A, "Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials", Dent Mater, 29, pp.419~426 (2013)
  5. Zhang Y, "Fatigue of dental ceramics", J Dent, 41, pp.1135~1147 (2013)
  6. Merve Bankoğlu Güngör, "Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD", CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials, 2016, pp.8(4), 259~266[DOI]
  7. Rekow ED, "Performance of dental ceramics : challenges for improvements", J Dent Res, 90, pp.937~952 (2011)
  8. Reston EG, "Repairing ceramic restorations: final solution or alternative procedure?", Oper Dent, 33, pp.461~466 (2008)
  9. Üstün Ö, "Shear bond strength of repair systems to new CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2018, pp.27, 748~754
  10. Filho AM, "Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength", J Prosthodont, 13, pp.28~35 (2004)
  11. Kussano CM, "Evaluation of shear bond strength of composite to porcelain according to surface treatment", Braz Dent J, 14, pp.132~135 (2003)
  12. Tylka DF, "Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for porcelain-composite repair", J Prosthet Dent, 72, pp.121~127 (1994)
  13. Kupiec KA, "Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.119~124 (1996)
  14. Blum IR, "An in vitro comparison of four intra-oral ceramic repair systems", J Dent, 40, pp.906~912 (2012)
  15. Elsaka SE, "Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD", CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems, 2015, pp.34, 161~167
  16. Ozcan M, "The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications : a clinical report", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.469~472 (2002)
  17. Duzyol M, "The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength between CAD", CAM blocks and composite resin, 2016, pp.25, 466~471
  18. Braga RR, "Adhesion to tooth structure : a critical review of"macro"test methods", Dent Mater, 26, pp.e38~e49 (2010)
  19. Papia E, "Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems : a systematic review", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 102, pp.395~413 (2014)
  20. 박준호, "Microtensile bond strength and micromorphologic analysis of surface-treated resin nanoceramics", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 8(4), pp.275~284 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  21. Pashley DH, "The microtensile bond test : a review", J Adhes Dent, 1, pp.299~309 (1999)
  22. Morresi AL, "Thermal cycling for restorative materials : does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 29, pp.295~308 (2014)
  23. Palmer DS, "Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.325~327 (1992)
  24. Spierings TA, "Verification of theoretical modeling of heat transmission in teeth by in vivo experiments", J Dent Res, 66, pp.1336~1339 (1987)
  25. Gale MS, "Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations", J Dent, 27, pp.89~99 (1999)
  26. Çelik Köycü B, "Heat transfer and thermal stress analysis of a mandibular molar tooth restored by different indirect restorations using a three-dimensional finite element method", J Prosthodont, 26, pp.460~473 (2017)
  27. Zaghloul H, "Effect of incorporation of silane in the bonding agent on the repair potential of machinable esthetic blocks", Eur J Dent, 8, pp.44~52 (2014)
  28. Meryem Gulce Subası, "Repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged resin nanoceramics", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(5), pp.364~370 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  29. Ugur Erdemir, "Shear bond strength of a new selfadhering flowable composite resin for lithium disilicate-reinforced CAD", CAM ceramic material, 2014, pp.6(6), 434~443[DOI]
  30. Baur V, "Repair of dental resin-based composites", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.601~608 (2013)
  31. Özel Bektas Ö, "Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin", Lasers Med Sci, 27, pp.723~728 (2012)
  32. Wiegand A, "Repairability of CAD", CAM high-density PMMA-and composite-based polymers, 2015, pp.19, 2007~2013
  33. Ozcan M, "Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems", Dent Mater, 25, pp.1477~1483 (2009)
  34. Victor Hugo dos Santos, "Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to composite submitted to different surface pretreatments", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 39(1), pp.12~16 (2014), 대한치과보존학회[DOI]
  35. Kirmali O, "Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding : effect of various surface treatments", Scanning, 37, pp.89~94 (2015)
  36. Ozcan M, "Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions", Dent Mater, 23, pp.1276~1282 (2007)
  37. Subaşi G, "Shear bond strength of three porcelain repair systems on porcelain in dry and aged conditions", Dentistry, 2, pp.1~7 (2012)
  38. de Melo RM, "Microtensile bond strength of a repair composite to leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic", Braz Dent J, 18, pp.314~319 (2007)
  39. Frankenberger R, "Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations", Oper Dent, 25, pp.209~215 (2000)
  40. Rüttermann S, "The effect of different bonding techniques on ceramic", resin shear bond strength, 2008, pp.10, 197~203
  41. Rathke A, "Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength", Clin Oral Investig, 13, pp.317~323 (2009)
  42. Hisamatsu N, "Effect of silane primers and unfilled resin bonding agents on repair bond strength of a prosthodontic microfilled composite", J Oral Rehabil, 29, pp.644~648 (2002)
  43. Swift EJ Jr, "Effect of a silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths", Am J Dent, 7, pp.200~202 (1994)
  44. Tinastepe N, "Comparative approach to analyse the effects of different surface treatments on CAD", CAM resin nanoceramics-resin composite repair bond strength, 2018, pp.32, 142~149
  45. Ozcan M, "Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics", Dent Mater, 19, pp.725~731 (2004)
  46. Michele Carrabba, "Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD", CAM feldspathic ceramics, 2017, pp.9(4), 257~264[DOI]
  47. Shahverdi S, "Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain", J Oral Rehabil, 25, pp.699~705 (1998)
  48. 김승미, "The effect of resin cements and primer on retentive force of zirconia copings bonded to zirconia abutments with insufficient retention", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 5(2), pp.198~203 (2013), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  49. Kirmali O, "Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic", Acta Odontol Scand, 73, pp.28~32 (2015)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

The effect of the improperly scanned scan body images on the accuracy of virtual implant positioning in computer-aided design software최용도, 박세원, 이두형pp. 107-113Evaluation of corrosion resistance of Co-Cr alloys fabricated with different metal laser sintering systemsErhan Karaca, Süleyman Hakan Tuna, Gürel Pekkan, İsmail Aslan, Nuran Özçiçek Pekmezpp. 114-123Evaluation of marginal discrepancy in metal frameworks fabricated by sintering-based computer-aided manufacturing methodsYeşim Ölçer Us, Necati Kaleli, Çağri Uralpp. 124-130Evaluation of the repair capacities and color stabilities of a resin nanoceramic and hybrid CAD/CAM blocksYusuf Bayraktar, Hasibe Sevilay Bahadirpp. 140-149Effect of surface finishing treatments on the color stability of CAD/CAM materialsFunda Ozen, Ozge Parlar Oz, Nermin Demirkolpp. 150-156
원문 보기