본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials

Seçil Karakoca Nemli|Bilge Turhan Bal|Merve Bankoğlu Güngör|Senem Ünver|Aylin Doğan
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy Of Prosthodontics)|2016.08|The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics|제8권 제4호|pp. 259-266|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.259

1

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Surface treatmentShear bond strengthResin ceramic hybrids

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to thermocycled and non-thermocycled CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 120 specimens (10×10×2 mm) from each material were divided into 12 groups according to different surface treatments in combination with thermal aging procedures. Surface treatment methods were airborne-particle abrasion (abraded with 50 micron alumina particles), dry grinding (grinded with 125 μm grain size bur), and hydrofluoric acid (9%) and silane application. According to the thermocycling procedure, the groups were assigned as non-thermocycled, thermocycled after packing composites, and thermocycled before packing composites. The average surface roughness of the non-thermocycled specimens were measured after surface treatments. After packing composites and thermocycling procedures, shear bond strength (SBS) of the specimens were tested. The results of surface roughness were statistically analyzed by 2-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and SBS results were statistically analyzed by 3-way ANOVA. RESULTS. Surface roughness of GC were significantly lower than that of LU and VE (P<.05). The highest surface roughness was observed for dry grinding group, followed by airborne particle abraded group (P<.05). Comparing the materials within the same surface treatment method revealed that untreated surfaces generally showed lower SBS values. The values of untreated LU specimens showed significantly different SBS values compared to those of other surface treatment groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION. SBS was affected by surface treatments. Thermocycling did not have any effect on the SBS of the materials except acid and silane applied GC specimens, which were subjected to thermocycling before packing of the composite resin.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to thermocycled and non-thermocycled CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 120 specimens (10×10×2 mm) from each material were divided into 12 groups according to different surface treatments in combination with thermal aging procedures. Surface treatment methods were airborne-particle abrasion (abraded with 50 micron alumina particles), dry grinding (grinded with 125 μm grain size bur), and hydrofluoric acid (9%) and silane application. According to the thermocycling procedure, the groups were assigned as non-thermocycled, thermocycled after packing composites, and thermocycled before packing composites. The average surface roughness of the non-thermocycled specimens were measured after surface treatments. After packing composites and thermocycling procedures, shear bond strength (SBS) of the specimens were tested. The results of surface roughness were statistically analyzed by 2-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and SBS results were statistically analyzed by 3-way ANOVA. RESULTS. Surface roughness of GC were significantly lower than that of LU and VE (P<.05). The highest surface roughness was observed for dry grinding group, followed by airborne particle abraded group (P<.05). Comparing the materials within the same surface treatment method revealed that untreated surfaces generally showed lower SBS values. The values of untreated LU specimens showed significantly different SBS values compared to those of other surface treatment groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION. SBS was affected by surface treatments. Thermocycling did not have any effect on the SBS of the materials except acid and silane applied GC specimens, which were subjected to thermocycling before packing of the composite resin.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. Villarroel M, "Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins", J Esthet Restor Dent, 23, pp.73~87 (2011)
  2. Alshehri SA, "An investigation into the role of core porcelain thickness and lamination in determining the flexural strength of In-Ceram dental materials", J Prosthodont, 20, pp.261~266 (2011)
  3. Tinschert J, "Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconiabased ceramics", J Dent, 28, pp.529~535 (2000)
  4. Beuer F, "Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD", CAM generated restorations, 2008, pp.204, 505~511
  5. Coldea A, "Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials", Dent Mater, 29, pp.419~426 (2013)
  6. Schlichting LH, "Noveldesign ultra-thin CAD", CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion, 2011, pp.105, 217~226
  7. Frankenberger R, "Adhesive luting of new CAD", CAM materials, 2015, pp.18, 9~20
  8. Koller M, "Lava ultimate resin nano ceramic for CAD", CAM: customization case study, 2012, pp.15, 159~164
  9. Awada A, "Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2015, pp.114, 587~593
  10. Bottino MA, "Inlays made from a hybrid material: adaptation and bond strengths", Oper Dent, 40, pp.E83~E91 (2015)
  11. Raposo LH, "Ceramic restoration repair: report of two cases", J Appl Oral Sci, 17, pp.140~144 (2009)
  12. Kupiec KA, "Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.119~124 (1996)
  13. Elsaka SE, "Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD", CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems, 2015, pp.34, 161~167
  14. Ozcan M, "Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs", Int J Prosthodont, 15, pp.299~302 (2002)
  15. Kim BK, "The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials", J Prosthet Dent, 94, pp.357~362 (2005)
  16. Roggendorf MJ, "Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD", CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyed teeth, 2012, pp.16, 1413~1424
  17. Sjögren G, "A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD", CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite, 2004, pp.17, 241~246
  18. Neis CA, "Surface treatments for repair of feldspathic, leucite - and lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramics using composite resin", Braz Dent J, 26, pp.152~155 (2015)
  19. Attia A, "Influence of surface treatment and cyclic loading on the durability of repaired all-ceramic crowns", J Appl Oral Sci, 18, pp.194~200 (2010)
  20. Gourav R, "Effect of four different surface treatments on shear bond strength of three porcelain repair systems: An in vitro study", J Conserv Dent, 16, pp.208~212 (2013)
  21. Colares RC, "Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin", Braz Dent J, 24, pp.349~352 (2013)
  22. Matinlinna JP, "Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces - an insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning", J Oral Rehabil, 34, pp.622~630 (2007)
  23. Ozcan M, "Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems", Dent Mater, 25, pp.1477~1483 (2009)
  24. Blum IR, "An in vitro comparison of four intra-oral ceramic repair systems", J Dent, 40, pp.906~912 (2012)
  25. Kocaağaoğlu HH, "An assessment of shear bond strength between ceramic repair systems and different ceramic infrastructures", Scanning, 37, pp.300~305 (2015)
  26. de Melo RM, "Microtensile bond strength of a repair composite to leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic", Braz Dent J, 18, pp.314~319 (2007)
  27. Stawarczyk B, "Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD", CAM resin nanoceramic, 2015, pp.19, 299~308
  28. Wiegand A, "Repairability of CAD", CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers, 2015, pp.19, 2007~2013
  29. Elsaka SE, "Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD", CAM hybrid ceramic material, 2016, pp.104, 68~76
  30. Awad D, "Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD", CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness, 2015, pp.113, 534~540
  31. Elsaka SE, "Bond strength of novel CAD", CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments, 2014, pp.16, 531~540
  32. Hu M, "Comparison of two test designsfor evaluating the shear bond strength of resin composite cements", Dent Mater, 32, pp.223~232 (2016)
  33. Otani A, "A critical evaluation of bond strength tests for the assessment of bonding to Y-TZP", Dent Mater, 31, pp.648~656 (2015)
  34. Heintze SD, "Crown pull-off test (crown retention test) to evaluate the bonding effectiveness of luting agents", Dent Mater, 26, pp.193~206 (2010)
  35. Magni E, "Influence of ozone on the composite-to-composite bond", Clin Oral Investig, 15, pp.249~256 (2011)
  36. Versluis A, "Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin?", J Dent Res, 76, pp.1298~1307 (1997)
  37. Lutz F, "Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations", Dent Mater, 7, pp.107~113 (1991)
  38. Heintze SD, "Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials. A review in 3 parts. Part 3: in vitro tests of adhesive systems", Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 121, pp.1024~1040 (2011)
  39. Hatta M, "The effect of surface treatment on bond strength of layering porcelain and hybrid composite bonded to zirconium dioxide ceramics", J Prosthodont Res, 55, pp.146~153 (2011)
  40. 이정진, "Evaluation of shear bond strength between dual cure resin cement and zirconia ceramic after thermocycling treatment", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 7(1), pp.1~7 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  41. Kim GH, "Shear bond strength between resin cement and colored zirconia made with metal chlorides", J Prosthet Dent, 113, pp.603~608 (2015)
  42. Shahdad SA, "Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study", J Dent, 26, pp.685~694 (1998)
  43. Baur V, "Repair of dental resin-based composites", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.601~608 (2013)
  44. Amaral FL, "Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review", J Esthet Restor Dent, 19, pp.340~353 (2007)
  45. Xie C, "Microtensile bond strength of one- and two-step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: the effects of thermocycling", Oper Dent, 35, pp.547~555 (2010)
  46. Gale MS, "Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations", J Dent, 27, pp.89~99 (1999)
  47. Özel Bektas Ö, "Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin", Lasers Med Sci, 27, pp.723~728 (2012)
  48. Celik C, "Resin composite repair:Quantitative microleakage evaluation of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments", Eur J Dent, 9, pp.92~99 (2015)
  49. Gregory WA, "Effects of heterogeneous layers of composite and time on composite repair of porcelain", Oper Dent, 15, pp.18~22 (1990)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

Effect of dimethyl sulfoxide on bond durability of fiber posts cemented with etch-and-rinse adhesivesMahtab Memarpour, Zahra Sarafraz, Fereshteh Shafieipp. 251-258Shear bond strength of indirect composite material to monolithic zirconiaSemih Ozsevik, Fatih Sari, Asli Secilmis, Irfan Simsekpp. 267-274Microtensile bond strength and micromorphologic analysis of surface-treated resin nanoceramics최유성, 박준호pp. 275-284Tensile bond strength between autopolymerized acrylic resin and acrylic denture teeth treated with MF-MA solutionTicha Thongrakard, Chairat Wiwatwarrapanpp. 285-289Influence of ozone and paracetic acid disinfection on adhesion of resilient liners to acrylic resinAhmet Ozkomur, Orhun Ekrenpp. 290-295
원문 보기