Comparing accuracy of denture bases fabricated by injection molding, CAD/CAM milling, and rapid prototyping method
2
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The accuracy of denture bases was compared among injection molding, milling, and rapid prototyping (RP) fabricating method. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The maxillary edentulous master cast was fabricated andround shaped four notches were formed. The cast was duplicated to ten casts and scanned. In the injection molding method, designed denture bases were milled from a wax block and fabricated using SR Ivocap injection system. Denture bases were milled from a pre-polymerized block in the milling method. In the RP method, denture bases were printed and post-cured. The intaglio surface of the base was scanned and surface matching software was used to measure inaccuracy. Measurements were performed between four notches and two points in the mid-palatal suture to evaluate inaccuracy. The palatine rugae resolution was evaluated. One-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis at α=.05. RESULTS. No statistically significant differences in distances among four notches (P>.05). The accuracy of the injection molding method was lower than those of the other methods in two points of the mid-palatal suture significantly (P<.05). The degree of palatine rugae resolution was significantly higher in the injection molding method than that in other methods (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The overall accuracy of the denture base is higher in milling and RP method than the injection molding method. The degree of fine reproducibility is higher in the injection molding method than the milling or RP method. [J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:55-64]
Abstract
PURPOSE. The accuracy of denture bases was compared among injection molding, milling, and rapid prototyping (RP) fabricating method. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The maxillary edentulous master cast was fabricated andround shaped four notches were formed. The cast was duplicated to ten casts and scanned. In the injection molding method, designed denture bases were milled from a wax block and fabricated using SR Ivocap injection system. Denture bases were milled from a pre-polymerized block in the milling method. In the RP method, denture bases were printed and post-cured. The intaglio surface of the base was scanned and surface matching software was used to measure inaccuracy. Measurements were performed between four notches and two points in the mid-palatal suture to evaluate inaccuracy. The palatine rugae resolution was evaluated. One-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis at α=.05. RESULTS. No statistically significant differences in distances among four notches (P>.05). The accuracy of the injection molding method was lower than those of the other methods in two points of the mid-palatal suture significantly (P<.05). The degree of palatine rugae resolution was significantly higher in the injection molding method than that in other methods (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The overall accuracy of the denture base is higher in milling and RP method than the injection molding method. The degree of fine reproducibility is higher in the injection molding method than the milling or RP method. [J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:55-64]
참고문헌 (35)
- Kawara M, "Distortion behavior of heat-activated acrylic denture-base resin in conventional and long, low-temperature processing methods", J Dent Res, 77, pp.1446~1453 (1998)
- Parvizi A, "Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of injection-molded denture base materials to that of conventional pressure-pack acrylic resin", J Prosthodont, 13, pp.83~89 (2004)
- Darvell BW, "The physical mechanisms of complete denture retention", Br Dent J, 189, pp.248~252 (2000)
- Jacob RF, "The traditional therapeutic paradigm : complete denture therapy", J Prosthet Dent, 79, pp.6~13 (1998)
- Jacobson TE, "A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete denture retention, stability, and support. Part I: retention", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.5~15 (1983)
- Jacobson TE, "A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part II: stability", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.165~172 (1983)
- Jacobson TE, "A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part III: support", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.306~313 (1983)
- Pryor WJ, "Injection molding of plastics for dentures", J Am Dent Assoc, 29, pp.1400~1408 (1942)
- Huggett R, "Dimensional accuracy and stability of acrylic resin denture bases", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.634~640 (1992)
- Goodacre CJ, "CAD", CAM fabricated complete dentures : concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data, 2012, pp.107, 34~46
- Bidra AS, "Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures : systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.361~366 (2013)
- Infante L, "Fabricating complete dentures with CAD", CAM technology, 2014, pp.111, 351~355
- Maeda Y, "A CAD", CAM system for removable denture. Part I: Fabrication of complete dentures, 1994, pp.7, 17~21
- Matsuda T, "Partdigitizing system of impression and interocclusal record for complete denture fabrication", J Prosthodont, 25, pp.503~509 (2016)
- Kuesel AC, "31P NMR studies of cultured human tumor cells. Influence of pH on phospholipid metabolite levels and the detection of cytidine 5’-diphosphate choline", NMR Biomed, 3, pp.78~89 (1990)
- Wimmer T, "Complete denture fabrication supported by CAD", CAM, 2016, pp.115, 541~546
- Munari LS, "Stress distribution in a premolar 3D model with anisotropic and isotropic enamel", Med Biol Eng Comput, 53, pp.751~758 (2015)
- Goodacre BJ, "Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.249~256 (2016)
- McLaughlin JB, "Comparison of fit of dentures fabricated by traditional techniques versus CAD", CAM technology, 2017, ~
- Johnson DL, "Contours of the edentulous palate", J Am Dent Assoc, 113, pp.35~40 (1986)
- Sykora O, "Posterior palatal seal adaptation : influence of processing technique, palate shape and immersion", J Oral Rehabil, 20, pp.19~31 (1993)
- Johnson DL, "The plastic postpalatal denture seal", Quintessence Int, 18, pp.457~462 (1987)
- Lee CJ, "Comparative adaptation accuracy of acrylic denture bases evaluated by two different methods", Dent Mater J, 29, pp.411~417 (2010)
- Steinmassl O, "CAD", CAM produces dentures with improved fit, 2018, pp.22, 2829~2835
- Schaefer O, "Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro", J Dent, 42, pp.677~683 (2014)
- Ender A, "Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems", Int J Comput Dent, 16, pp.11~21 (2013)
- Petrovic V, "Additive layered manufacturing : sectors of industrial application shown through case studies", Int J Prod Res, 49, pp.1061~1079 (2011)
- Groth C, "Three-dimensional printing technology", J Clin Orthod, 48, pp.475~485 (2014)
- Alharbi N, "Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.760~767 (2016)
- Braian M, "Production tolerance of additive manufactured polymeric objects for clinical applications", Dent Mater, 32, pp.853~861 (2016)
- Allen S, "On the computation of part orientation using support structures in layered manufacturing", Proceedings of the International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, pp.259~269 (1994)
- Plooij JM, "Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 40, pp.341~352 (2011)
- Revilla-León M, "Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: Current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry", J Prosthodont (2018)
- Srinivasan M, "CAD", CAM milled removable complete dentures : an in vitro evaluation of trueness, 2017, pp.21, 2007~2019
- Puebla K, "Effects of environmental conditions, aging, and build orientations on the mechanical properties of ASTM type I specimens manufactured via stereolithography", Rapid Prototyp J, 18, pp.374~388 (2012)