Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks produced using different digital protocols. Materials and methods. 80 frameworks for RPDs were produced using CAD-CAM technology and divided into four groups of twenty (n = 20): Group 1, Titanium frameworks manufactured by digital metal laser sintering (DMLS); Group 2, Co-Cr frameworks manufactured by DMLS; Group 3, Polyamide PA12 castable resin manufactured by multi-jet fusion (MJF); and Group 4, Metal (Co-Cr) casting by using lost-wax technique. After the digital acquisition, eight specific areas were selected in order to measure the ∆-error value at the intaglio surface of RPD. The minimum value required for point sampling density (0.4 mm) was derived from the sensitivity analysis. The obtained ∆-error mean value was used for comparisons: 1. between different manufacturing processes; 2. between different manufacturing techniques in the same area of interest (AOI); and 3. between different AOI of the same group. Results. The ∆-error mean value of each group ranged between -0.002 (Ti) and 0.041 (Co-Cr) mm. The Pearson’s Chi-squared test revealed significant differences considering all groups paired two by two, except for group 3 and 4. The multiple comparison test documented a significant difference for each AOI among group 1, 3, and 4. The multiple comparison test showed significant differences among almost all different AOIs of each group. Conclusion. All ∆-mean error values of all digital protocols for manufacturing RPD frameworks optimally fit within the clinical tolerance limit of trueness and precision. [J Adv Prosthodont 2023;15:55-62]
Abstract
Purpose. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks produced using different digital protocols. Materials and methods. 80 frameworks for RPDs were produced using CAD-CAM technology and divided into four groups of twenty (n = 20): Group 1, Titanium frameworks manufactured by digital metal laser sintering (DMLS); Group 2, Co-Cr frameworks manufactured by DMLS; Group 3, Polyamide PA12 castable resin manufactured by multi-jet fusion (MJF); and Group 4, Metal (Co-Cr) casting by using lost-wax technique. After the digital acquisition, eight specific areas were selected in order to measure the ∆-error value at the intaglio surface of RPD. The minimum value required for point sampling density (0.4 mm) was derived from the sensitivity analysis. The obtained ∆-error mean value was used for comparisons: 1. between different manufacturing processes; 2. between different manufacturing techniques in the same area of interest (AOI); and 3. between different AOI of the same group. Results. The ∆-error mean value of each group ranged between -0.002 (Ti) and 0.041 (Co-Cr) mm. The Pearson’s Chi-squared test revealed significant differences considering all groups paired two by two, except for group 3 and 4. The multiple comparison test documented a significant difference for each AOI among group 1, 3, and 4. The multiple comparison test showed significant differences among almost all different AOIs of each group. Conclusion. All ∆-mean error values of all digital protocols for manufacturing RPD frameworks optimally fit within the clinical tolerance limit of trueness and precision. [J Adv Prosthodont 2023;15:55-62]
참고문헌 (28)
- Wu J, "A study on the fabrication method of removable partial denture framework by computer-aided design and rapid prototyping", Rapid Prototyp J, 18, pp.318~323 (2012)
- Han J, "A preliminary report of designing removable partial denture frameworks using a specifically developed software package", Int J Prosthodont, 23, pp.370~375 (2010)
- Yang L, "Computer aided design and manufacture of the removable partial denture framework", Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi, 27, pp.170~173 (2010)
- Gao B, "Fabricating titanium denture base plate by laser rapid forming", Rapid Prototyp J, 15, pp.133~136 (2009)
- Bibb RJ, "Trial fitting of a removable partial denture framework made using computer-aided design and rapid prototyping techniques", Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 220, pp.793~797 (2006)
- Bibb R, "Rapid manufacture of removable partial denture frameworks", Rapid Prototyp J, 12, pp.95~99 (2006)
- Williams RJ, "Use of CAD", CAM technology to fabricate a removable partial denture framework, 2006, pp.96, 96~99
- Ye H, "Preliminary clinical application of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated using computer-aided design and rapid prototyping techniques", Int J Prosthodont, 30, pp.348~353 (2017)
- Hayama H, "Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible", J Prosthodont Res, 62, pp.347~352 (2018)
- Lytle RB, "Soft tissue displacement beneath removable partial and complete dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 12, pp.34~43 (1962)
- Seelbach P, "Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.1759~1764 (2013)
- Kattadiyil MT, "Intraoral scanning of hard and soft tissues for partial removable dental prosthesis fabrication", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.444~448 (2014)
- Müller P, "Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner", Quintessence Int, 47, pp.343~349 (2016)
- Bilgin M, "A review of computer-aided design", computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication, 2016, pp.10, 286~291
- Dawood A, "3D printing in dentistry", Br Dent J, 219, pp.521~529 (2015)
- Hazeveld A, "Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 145, pp.108~115 (2014)
- Revilla-León M, "Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers : current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry", J Prosthodont, 28, pp.146~158 (2019)
- Tasaka A, "Accuracy of removable partial denture framework fabricated by casting with a 3D printed pattern and selective laser sintering", J Prosthodont Res, 64, pp.224~230 (2020)
- Tasaka A, "Accuracy of clasps fabricated with three different CAD", CAM technologies: casting, milling, and selective laser sintering, 2019, pp.32, 526~529
- Ciocca L, "Outdoing best-fit approaches for the manufacturing accuracy evaluation of complete denture bases", Int J Interact Des Manuf, 2022, pp.1~9 (2022)
- Xie W, "The effect of build orientation on the microstructure and properties of selective laser melting Ti-6Al-4V for removable partial denture clasps", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.163~172 (2020)
- Kajima Y, "Fatigue strength of Co-Cr-Mo alloy clasps prepared by selective laser melting", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 59, pp.446~458 (2016)
- Stern MA, "Clinical evaluation of removable partial denture rest seat adaptation", J Prosthet Dent, 53, pp.658~662 (1985)
- Gowri V, "Effect of anchorage on the accuracy of fit in removable partial denture framework", J Prosthodont, 19, pp.387~390 (2010)
- Dunham D, "A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial dental prosthesis clasp assemblies", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.323~326 (2006)
- Chen H, "Adaptation of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting", J Prosthet Dent, 122, pp.316~324 (2019)
- Lee JW, "Accuracy of a digital removable partial denture fabricated by casting a rapid prototyped pattern : A clinical study", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.468~474 (2017)
- Oh KC, "Accuracy of metal 3D printed frameworks for removable partial dentures evaluated by digital superimposition", Dent Mater, 38, pp.309~317 (2022)