Subtractive versus additive indirect manufacturing techniques of digitally designed partial dentures
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of digitally designed removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks, constructed by additive and subtractive methods castable resin patterns, using comparative 3D analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A Kennedy class III mod. 1 educational maxillary model was used in this study. The cast was scanned after modification, and a removable partial denture framework was digitally designed. Twelve frameworks were constructed. Two groups were defined: Group A: six frameworks were milled with castable resin, then casted by the lost wax technique into Co-Cr frameworks; Group B: six frameworks were printed with castable resin, then casted by the lost wax technique into Co-Cr frameworks. Comparative 3D analysis was used to measure the accuracy of the fabricated frameworks using Geomagic Control X software. Student’s t-test was used for comparing data. P value ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS. Regarding the accuracy of the occlusal rests, group A (milled) (0.1417 ± 0.0224) showed significantly higher accuracy than group B (printed) (0.02347 ± 0.0221). The same results were found regarding the 3D comparison of the overall accuracy, in which group A (0.1501 ± 0.0205) was significantly more accurate than group B (0.179 ± 0.0137). CONCLUSION. In indirect fabrication techniques, subtractive manufacturing yields more accurate RPDs than additive manufacturing.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of digitally designed removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks, constructed by additive and subtractive methods castable resin patterns, using comparative 3D analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A Kennedy class III mod. 1 educational maxillary model was used in this study. The cast was scanned after modification, and a removable partial denture framework was digitally designed. Twelve frameworks were constructed. Two groups were defined: Group A: six frameworks were milled with castable resin, then casted by the lost wax technique into Co-Cr frameworks; Group B: six frameworks were printed with castable resin, then casted by the lost wax technique into Co-Cr frameworks. Comparative 3D analysis was used to measure the accuracy of the fabricated frameworks using Geomagic Control X software. Student’s t-test was used for comparing data. P value ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS. Regarding the accuracy of the occlusal rests, group A (milled) (0.1417 ± 0.0224) showed significantly higher accuracy than group B (printed) (0.02347 ± 0.0221). The same results were found regarding the 3D comparison of the overall accuracy, in which group A (0.1501 ± 0.0205) was significantly more accurate than group B (0.179 ± 0.0137). CONCLUSION. In indirect fabrication techniques, subtractive manufacturing yields more accurate RPDs than additive manufacturing.
참고문헌 (20)
- Preshaw PM, "Association of removable partial denture use with oral and systemic health", J Dent, 39, pp.711~719 (2011)
- Viswambaran M, "Effect of storage time and framework design on the accuracy of maxillary cobalt-chromium cast removable partial dentures", Contemp Clin Dent, 6, pp.471~476 (2015)
- Benso B, "Failures in the rehabilitation treatment with removable partial dentures", Acta Odontol Scand, 71, pp.1351~1355 (2013)
- Dunham D, "A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial dental prosthesis clasp assemblies", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.323~326 (2006)
- Campbell SD, "Removable partial dentures : The clinical need for innovation", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.273~280 (2017)
- Kanazawa M, "Trial of a CAD", CAM system for fabricating complete dentures, 2011, pp.30, 93~96
- Abduo J, "Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics : a review of the available streams", Int J Dent, 2014, pp.783948~ (2014)
- Stansbury JW, "3D printing with polymers : challenges among expanding options and opportunities", Dent Mater, 32, pp.54~64 (2016)
- Moraru E, "Lecture notes in networks and systems", pp.8~17 (2019), Springer International Publishing
- Hyndman RJ, "Another look at measures of forecast accuracy", Int J Forecast, 22, pp.679~688 (2006)
- Arnold C, "Accuracy of CAD-CAM-fabricated removable partial dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.586~592 (2018)
- Soltanzadeh P, "An in vitro investigation of accuracy and fit of conventional and CAD", CAM removable partial denture frameworks, 2019, pp.28, 547~555
- Tregerman I, "Evaluation of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated using 3 different techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 122, pp.390~395 (2019)
- Eggbeer D, "The computer-aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable partial denture frameworks", Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 219, pp.195~202 (2005)
- Tasaka A, "Accuracy of clasps fabricated with three different CAD", CAM technologies: casting, milling, and selective laser sintering, 2019, pp.32, 526~529
- Goodacre BJ, "Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.249~256 (2016)
- Kalberer N, "CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped(3D-printed)complete dentures : an in vitro evaluation of trueness", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.637~643 (2019)
- Bae EJ, "A comparative study of additive and subtractive manufacturing for dental restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.187~193 (2017)
- Tasaka A, "Accuracy of removable partial denture framework fabricated by casting with a 3D printed pattern and selective laser sintering", J Prosthodont Res, 64, pp.224~230 (2020)
- Örtorp A, "The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques : a comparative in vitro study", Dent Mater, 27, pp.356~363 (2011)