본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis of the trueness and precision of complete denture bases manufactured using digital and analog technologies

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose. Digital technology has enabled improvements in the fitting accuracy of denture bases via milling techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trueness and precision of digital and analog techniques for manufacturing complete dentures (CDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty identical CDs were manufactured using different production protocols. Digital and analog technologies were compared using the reference geometric approach, and the Δ-error values of eight areas of interest (AOI) were calculated. For each AOI, a precise number of measurement points was selected according to sensitivity analyses to compare the Δ-error of trueness and precision between the original model and manufactured prosthesis. Three types of statistical analysis were performed: to calculate the intergroup cumulative difference among the three protocols, the intergroup among the AOIs, and the intragroup difference among AOIs. Results. There was a statistically significant difference between the dentures made using the oversize process and injection molding process (P < .001), but no significant difference between the other two manufacturing methods (P = .1227). There was also a statistically significant difference between the dentures made using the monolithic process and the other two processes for all AOIs (P = .0061), but there was no significant difference between the other two processes (P = 1). Within each group, significant differences among the AOIs were observed. Conclusion. The monolithic process yielded better results, in terms of accuracy (trueness and precision), than the other groups, although all three processes led to dentures with Δ-error values well within the clinical tolerance limit.

Abstract

Purpose. Digital technology has enabled improvements in the fitting accuracy of denture bases via milling techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trueness and precision of digital and analog techniques for manufacturing complete dentures (CDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty identical CDs were manufactured using different production protocols. Digital and analog technologies were compared using the reference geometric approach, and the Δ-error values of eight areas of interest (AOI) were calculated. For each AOI, a precise number of measurement points was selected according to sensitivity analyses to compare the Δ-error of trueness and precision between the original model and manufactured prosthesis. Three types of statistical analysis were performed: to calculate the intergroup cumulative difference among the three protocols, the intergroup among the AOIs, and the intragroup difference among AOIs. Results. There was a statistically significant difference between the dentures made using the oversize process and injection molding process (P < .001), but no significant difference between the other two manufacturing methods (P = .1227). There was also a statistically significant difference between the dentures made using the monolithic process and the other two processes for all AOIs (P = .0061), but there was no significant difference between the other two processes (P = 1). Within each group, significant differences among the AOIs were observed. Conclusion. The monolithic process yielded better results, in terms of accuracy (trueness and precision), than the other groups, although all three processes led to dentures with Δ-error values well within the clinical tolerance limit.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Goodacre BJ, "Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.249~256 (2016)
  2. Kattadiyil MT, "CAD", CAM complete dentures : a review of two commercial fabrication systems, 2013, pp.41, 407~416
  3. Bidra AS, "Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.361~366 (2013)
  4. Kattadiyil MT, "Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.818~825 (2015)
  5. Nguyen JF, "High-temperature-pressure polymerized resin-infiltrated ceramic networks", J Dent Res, 93, pp.62~67 (2014)
  6. Infante L, "Fabricating complete dentures with CAD", CAM technology, 2014, pp.111, 351~355
  7. Murakami N, "Effect of high-pressure polymerization on mechanical properties of PMMA denture base resin", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 20, pp.98~104 (2013)
  8. Lung CY, "Minimization of the inevitable residual monomer in denture base acrylic", Dent Mater, 21, pp.1119~1128 (2005)
  9. Antonopoulos AN, "Dimensional and occlusal changes in fluid resin dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 39, pp.605~615 (1978)
  10. Grant AA, "Comparison between dimensional accuracy of dentures produced with pour-type resin and with heat-processed materials", J Prosthet Dent, 26, pp.296~301 (1971)
  11. Nogueira SS, "Comparison of accuracy between compression-and injection-molded complete dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 82, pp.291~300 (1999)
  12. Bidra AS, "Prospective cohort pilot study of 2-visit CAD", CAM monolithic complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures : Clinical and patient-centered outcomes, 2016, pp.115, 578~86.e1
  13. Pereyra NM, "Comparison of patient satisfaction in the fabrication of conventional dentures vs. dentca (CAD", CAM) dentures:a case report, 2015, pp.86, 26~33
  14. Srinivasan M, "CAD", CAM milled removable complete dentures : an in vitro evaluation of trueness, 2017, pp.21, 2007~2019
  15. Chen H, "Quantitative evaluation of tissue surface adaption of cad-designed and 3D printed wax pattern of maxillary complete denture", Biomed Res Int, 2015, pp.453968~ (2015)
  16. Inokoshi M, "Evaluation of a complete denture trial method applying rapid prototyping", Dent Mater J, 31, pp.40~46 (2012)
  17. Ciocca L, "Outdoing best-fit approaches for the manufacturing accuracy evaluation of complete denture bases", Int J Interact Des Manuf, pp.1~9 (2022)
  18. Afnan F. Al-Fouzan, "Adherence of Candida to complete denture surfaces in vitro: A comparison of conventional and CAD", CAM complete dentures, 2017, pp.9(5), 402~408[DOI]
  19. Srinivasan M, "CAD", CAM milled complete removable dental prostheses: An in vitro evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface roughness, 2018, pp.37, 526~533
  20. Kalberer N, "CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped(3D-printed)complete dentures : An in vitro evaluation of trueness", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.637~643 (2019)
  21. Suji Lee, "Comparing accuracy of denture bases fabricated by injection molding, CAD", CAM milling, and rapid prototyping method, 2019, pp.11(1), 55~64[DOI]
  22. Yoon HI, "Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing", J Prosthet Dent, 120, pp.919~926 (2018)
  23. Hwang HJ, "Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CADCAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.110~117 (2019)
  24. Tasaka A, "Accuracy and retention of denture base fabricated by heat curing and additive manufacturing", J Prosthodont Res, 63, pp.85~89 (2019)
  25. Steinmassl O, "CAD", CAM produces dentures with improved fit, 2018, pp.22, 2829~2835
  26. Cook RJ, "Response of the oral mucosa to denture wearing", J Dent, 19, pp.135~147 (1991)
  27. Dong J, "Measurement of mucosal thickness in denture-bearing area of edentulous mandible", Chin Med J(Engl), 128, pp.342~347 (2015)
  28. Deng K, "Evaluation of adaptation of the polylactic acid pattern of maxillary complete dentures fabricated by fused deposition modelling technology : A pilot study", PLoS One, 13, pp.e0201777~ (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

Occlusal teeth surface accuracy of milled complete dentures: a comparison between different manufacturing techniquesAngela Montanari, Laura Anderlucci, Leonardo Ciocca, Lorenzo Breschi, Mattia Maltauro, Roberto Meneghello, Volodymyr Kravets대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2025 · 제17권 제4호Comparing accuracy of denture bases fabricated by injection molding, CAD/CAM milling, and rapid prototyping method권긍록, 노관태, 배아란, 백장현, 홍성진, Suji Lee대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2019 · 제11권 제1호Subtractive versus additive indirect manufacturing techniques of digitally designed partial denturesAhmed Mamdouh Snosi, Fardos Nabil Rizk, Marwa Ezzat Sabet, Shaimaa Mohamed Lotfy, Yasmine Galaleldin Thabet대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2021 · 제13권 제5호Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materialsAngela Montanari, Elena Pierantozzi, Laura Anderlucci, Leonardo Ciocca, Lorenzo Breschi, Mattia Maltauro, Roberto Meneghello대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2023 · 제15권 제2호Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method이규복, 이완선, 정유금대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2018 · 제10권 제3호Comparison of the accuracy of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated using conventional and digital impressions: a clinical study강유정, 김지환, 선민지, 윤명아, 전정호대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2025 · 제17권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)