Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To evaluate the accuracy of a model made using the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) milling method and 3D printing method and to confirm its applicability as a work model for dental prosthesis production. MATERIALS AND METHODS. First, a natural tooth model (ANA-4, Frasaco, Germany) was scanned using an oral scanner. The obtained scan data were then used as a CAD reference model (CRM), to produce a total of 10 models each, either using the milling method or the 3D printing method. The 20 models were then scanned using a desktop scanner and the CAD test model was formed. The accuracy of the two groups was compared using dedicated software to calculate the root mean square (RMS) value after superimposing CRM and CAD test model (CTM). RESULTS. The RMS value (152±52 μm) of the model manufactured by the milling method was significantly higher than the RMS value (52±9 μm) of the model produced by the 3D printing method. CONCLUSION. The accuracy of the 3D printing method is superior to that of the milling method, but at present, both methods are limited in their application as a work model for prosthesis manufacture.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate the accuracy of a model made using the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) milling method and 3D printing method and to confirm its applicability as a work model for dental prosthesis production. MATERIALS AND METHODS. First, a natural tooth model (ANA-4, Frasaco, Germany) was scanned using an oral scanner. The obtained scan data were then used as a CAD reference model (CRM), to produce a total of 10 models each, either using the milling method or the 3D printing method. The 20 models were then scanned using a desktop scanner and the CAD test model was formed. The accuracy of the two groups was compared using dedicated software to calculate the root mean square (RMS) value after superimposing CRM and CAD test model (CTM). RESULTS. The RMS value (152±52 μm) of the model manufactured by the milling method was significantly higher than the RMS value (52±9 μm) of the model produced by the 3D printing method. CONCLUSION. The accuracy of the 3D printing method is superior to that of the milling method, but at present, both methods are limited in their application as a work model for prosthesis manufacture.
참고문헌 (21)
- Perakis N, "Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 24, pp.109~117 (2004)
- Wettstein F, "Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures", Eur J Oral Sci, 116, pp.272~279 (2008)[DOI]
- Persson AS, "Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness", Dent Mater, 25, pp.929~936 (2009)[DOI]
- Christensen GJ, "The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement", J Am Dent Assoc, 136, pp.343~346 (2005)[DOI]
- Christensen GJ, "Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling", J Am Dent Assoc, 140, pp.1301~1304 (2009)[DOI]
- Beuer F, "Digital dentistry: an over-view of recent developments for CAD", CAM generated restorations, 2008, pp.204, 505~511
- Mehl A, "Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera", Int J Comput Dent, 12, pp.11~28 (2009)
- Fasbinder DJ, "Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 31, pp.2~11 (2010)
- van Noort R, "The future of dental devices is digital", Dent Mater, 28, pp.3~12 (2012)[DOI]
- Yau HT, "Comparison of 3-D printing and 5-axis milling for the production of dental emodels from in- tra-oral scanning", CAD App, 13, pp.32~38 (2016)
- Kasparova M, "Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models", Biomed Eng Online, 12, pp.49~ (2013)[DOI]
- Jeong ID, "Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.755~759 (2016)[DOI]
- Quaas S, "Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD", CAM restorations, 2007, pp.35, 903~908
- Koch GK, "Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.749~754 (2016)[DOI]
- 이예규, "Comparison of intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques using 3-dimensional superimposition", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 7(6), pp.460~467 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Martins LM, "Internal fit of two all-ceramic systems and metal-ceramic crowns", J Appl Oral Sci, 20, pp.235~40 (2012)[DOI]
- Moldovan O, "Three-dimensional fit of CAD", CAM-made zirconia copings, 2011, pp.27, 1273~1278
- Seelbach P, "Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.1759~1764 (2013)[DOI]
- Moldovan O, "Three-dimensional fit of CAD", CAM-made zirconia copings, 2011, pp.27, 1273~1278
- 주용훈, "알지네이트 인상체에서 제작된 치과용 석고 모형의 정확도에 대한 삼차원 디지털 분석", 구강회복응용과학지, 31(4), pp.316~328 (2015), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
- Colpani JT, "Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings", Dent Mater, 29, pp.174~180 (2013)[DOI]