Comparative evaluation of peri-implant stress distribution in implant protected occlusion and cuspally loaded occlusion on a 3 unit implant supported fixed partial denture: A 3D finite element analysis study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose. To assess peri-implant stress distribution using finite element analysis in implant supported fixed partial denture with occlusal schemes of cuspally loaded occlusion and implant protected occlusion. Materials and methods. A 3-D finite element model of mandible with D2 bone with partially edentulism with unilateral distal extension was made. Two Ti alloy identical implants with 4.2 mm diameter and 10 mm length were placed in the mandibular second premolar and the mandibular second molar region and prosthesis was given with the mandibular first molar pontic. Vertical load of 100 N and and oblique load of 70 N was applied on occlusal surface of prosthesis. Group 1 was cuspally loaded occlusion with total 8 contact points and Group 2 was implant protected occlusion with 3 contact points. Results. In Group 1 for vertical load, maximum stress was generated over implant having 14.3552 Mpa. While for oblique load, overall stress generated was 28.0732 Mpa. In Group 2 for vertical load, maximum stress was generated over crown and overall stress was 16.7682 Mpa. But for oblique load, crown stress and overall stress was maximum 22.7561 Mpa. When Group 1 is compared to Group 2, harmful oblique load caused maximum overall stress 28.0732 Mpa in Group 1. Conclusion. In Group 1, vertical load generated high implant stress, and oblique load generated high overall stresses, cortical stresses and crown stresses compared to vertical load. In Group 2, oblique load generated more overall stresses, cortical stresses, and crown stresses compared to vertical load. Implant protected occlusion generated lesser harmful oblique implant, crown, bone and overall stresses compared to cuspally loaded occlusion.
Abstract
Purpose. To assess peri-implant stress distribution using finite element analysis in implant supported fixed partial denture with occlusal schemes of cuspally loaded occlusion and implant protected occlusion. Materials and methods. A 3-D finite element model of mandible with D2 bone with partially edentulism with unilateral distal extension was made. Two Ti alloy identical implants with 4.2 mm diameter and 10 mm length were placed in the mandibular second premolar and the mandibular second molar region and prosthesis was given with the mandibular first molar pontic. Vertical load of 100 N and and oblique load of 70 N was applied on occlusal surface of prosthesis. Group 1 was cuspally loaded occlusion with total 8 contact points and Group 2 was implant protected occlusion with 3 contact points. Results. In Group 1 for vertical load, maximum stress was generated over implant having 14.3552 Mpa. While for oblique load, overall stress generated was 28.0732 Mpa. In Group 2 for vertical load, maximum stress was generated over crown and overall stress was 16.7682 Mpa. But for oblique load, crown stress and overall stress was maximum 22.7561 Mpa. When Group 1 is compared to Group 2, harmful oblique load caused maximum overall stress 28.0732 Mpa in Group 1. Conclusion. In Group 1, vertical load generated high implant stress, and oblique load generated high overall stresses, cortical stresses and crown stresses compared to vertical load. In Group 2, oblique load generated more overall stresses, cortical stresses, and crown stresses compared to vertical load. Implant protected occlusion generated lesser harmful oblique implant, crown, bone and overall stresses compared to cuspally loaded occlusion.
참고문헌 (26)
- Brånemark PI, "Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl, 16, pp.1~132 (1977)
- Ashman RB, "The elastic properties of a human mandible", Adv Dent Res, 1, pp.64~67 (1987)
- Schulte W, "Implants and the periodontium", Int Dent J, 45, pp.16~26 (1995)
- Gartner JL, "Effect of osseointegrated implants on the coordination of masticatory muscles : a pilot study", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.185~193 (2000)
- Misch CE, "Implant-protected occlusion : a biomechanical rationale", Compendium, 15, pp.1330~1334 (1994)[DOI]
- Trivedi S, "Finite element analysis : A boon to dentistry", J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 4, pp.200~203 (2014)
- Nelson S, "Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion", pp.45~48 (2009), Elsevier
- Rodríguez-Ciurana X, "Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width : a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 29, pp.479~487 (2009)
- Misch CE, "Dental implant prosthetics", pp.2005, Elsevier
- Misch CE, "Implant-protected occlusion", Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 7, pp.25~29 (1995)
- Misch CE, "Dental implant prosthetics", pp.874~912 (2015), Elsevier Mobsy
- "The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: ninth edition", J Prosthet Dent, 117(5S), pp.e1~e105 (2017)
- Falcón-Antenucci RM, "Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses. A three-dimensional finite element analysis", J Prosthodont, 19, pp.381~386 (2010)
- Eskitascioglu G, "The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone : a three-dimensional finite element study", J Prosthet Dent, 91, pp.144~150 (2004)
- Rilo B, "Guidelines for occlusion strategy in implant-borne prostheses. A review", Int Dent J, 58, pp.139~145 (2008)
- Sevimay M, "The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone : a three-dimensional finite-element study", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 73, pp.140~147 (2005)
- Swaminathan Y, "Implant protected occlusion", IOSR J Dent Med Sci, 11, pp.20~25 (2013)
- Verma M, "Principles of occlusion in implant dentistry", J Int Clin Dent Res Organ, 7, pp.27~33 (2015)
- Misch CE, "Medial positioned lingualized occlusion", Misch Institute manual, ~ (1991)
- Misch CE, "Contemporary implant dentistry" (1993), Mosby
- Guven S, "Comparison of the effects of different loading locations on stresses transferred to straight and angled implant-supported zirconia frameworks : a finite element method study", Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip, 29, pp.766~772 (2015)
- Curtis DA, "Occlusal considerations for implant restorations in the partially edentulous patient", J Calif Dent Assoc, 28, pp.771~779 (2000)
- Goellner M, "The effect of axial and oblique loading on the micromovement of dental implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.257~264 (2011)
- Akça K, "Implant-tooth-supported fixed partial prostheses : correlations between in vivo occlusal bite forces and marginal bone reactions", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.331~336 (2006)
- Lundgren D, "Occlusal force pattern during mastication in dentitions with mandibular fixed partial dentures supported on osseointegrated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 58, pp.197~203 (1987)
- Kaukinen JA, "The influence of occlusal design on simulated masticatory forces transferred to implant-retained prostheses and supporting bone", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.50~55 (1996)