Three-dimensional finite element analysis of buccally cantilevered implantsupported prostheses in a severely resorbed mandible
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose. The aim of the study was to compare the lingualized implant placement creating a buccal cantilever with prosthetic-driven implant placement exhibiting excessive crown-to-implant ratio. Materials and Methods. Based on patient’s CT scan data, two finite element models were created. Both models were composed of the severely resorbed posterior mandible with first premolar and second molar and missing second premolar and first molar, a twounit prosthesis supported by two implants. The differences were in implants position and crown-to-implant ratio; lingualized implants creating lingually overcontoured prosthesis (Model CP2) and prosthetic-driven implants creating an excessive crown-to-implant ratio (Model PD2). A screw preload of 466.4 N and a buccal occlusal load of 262 N were applied. The contacts between the implant components were set to a frictional contact with a friction coefficient of 0.3. The maximum von Mises stress and strain and maximum equivalent plastic strain were analyzed and compared, as well as volumes of the materials under specified stress and strain ranges. Results. The results revealed that the highest maximum von Mises stress in each model was 1091 MPa for CP2 and 1085 MPa for PD2. In the cortical bone, CP2 showed a lower peak stress and a similar peak strain. Besides, volume calculation confirmed that CP2 presented lower volumes undergoing stress and strain. The stresses in implant components were slightly lower in value in PD2. However, CP2 exhibited a noticeably higher plastic strain. CONCLUSION. Prosthetic-driven implant placement might biomechanically be more advantageous than bone quantity-based implant placement that creates a buccal cantilever.
Abstract
Purpose. The aim of the study was to compare the lingualized implant placement creating a buccal cantilever with prosthetic-driven implant placement exhibiting excessive crown-to-implant ratio. Materials and Methods. Based on patient’s CT scan data, two finite element models were created. Both models were composed of the severely resorbed posterior mandible with first premolar and second molar and missing second premolar and first molar, a twounit prosthesis supported by two implants. The differences were in implants position and crown-to-implant ratio; lingualized implants creating lingually overcontoured prosthesis (Model CP2) and prosthetic-driven implants creating an excessive crown-to-implant ratio (Model PD2). A screw preload of 466.4 N and a buccal occlusal load of 262 N were applied. The contacts between the implant components were set to a frictional contact with a friction coefficient of 0.3. The maximum von Mises stress and strain and maximum equivalent plastic strain were analyzed and compared, as well as volumes of the materials under specified stress and strain ranges. Results. The results revealed that the highest maximum von Mises stress in each model was 1091 MPa for CP2 and 1085 MPa for PD2. In the cortical bone, CP2 showed a lower peak stress and a similar peak strain. Besides, volume calculation confirmed that CP2 presented lower volumes undergoing stress and strain. The stresses in implant components were slightly lower in value in PD2. However, CP2 exhibited a noticeably higher plastic strain. CONCLUSION. Prosthetic-driven implant placement might biomechanically be more advantageous than bone quantity-based implant placement that creates a buccal cantilever.
참고문헌 (50)
- "The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.e1~e105 (2017)
- Hälg GA, "Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.983~990 (2008)
- Stegaroiu R, "Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants : a three-dimensional finite element analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.82~90 (1998)
- Kim P, "The impact of cantilevers on biological and technical success outcomes of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. A retrospective cohort study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.175~184 (2014)
- Romeo E, "Implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses in partially edentulous arches. A seven-year prospective study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.303~311 (2003)
- Palmer RM, "A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two-unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.35~40 (2012)
- Wennström J, "Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function", J Clin Periodontol, 31, pp.1077~1083 (2004)
- Maló P, "The prognosis of partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilevers. A 5-year retrospective cohort study", Eur J Oral Implantol, 6, pp.51~59 (2013)
- Romeo E, "Implant-supported fixed cantilever prosthesis in partially edentulous jaws : a cohort prospective study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.1278~1285 (2009)
- Rosén A, "Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : a long-term follow-up study", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 65, pp.1010~1016 (2007)
- Zurdo J, "Survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers : a systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.59~66 (2009)
- Romeo E, "Systematic review of the survival rate and the biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of fixed dental prostheses with cantilevers on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean of 5 years follow-up", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.39~49 (2012)
- Brosky ME, "The anterior cantilever in the implant-supported screw-retained mandibular prosthesis", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.244~249 (2003)
- Schropp L, "Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction : a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 23, pp.313~323 (2003)
- Tan WL, "A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.1~21 (2012)
- Kim Y, "Occlusal considerations in implant therapy : clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.26~35 (2005)
- DeTolla DH, "Role of the finite element model in dental implants", J Oral Implantol, 26, pp.77~81 (2000)
- Trivedi S, "Finite element analysis : A boon to dentistry", J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 4, pp.200~203 (2014)
- Brunski JB, "Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface", Clin Mater, 10, pp.153~201 (1992)
- Robling AG, "Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling", Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 8, pp.455~498 (2006)
- Teixeira E, "A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics", J Oral Rehabil, 25, pp.299~303 (1998)
- Nejatidanesh F, "Comparison of marginal and internal adaptation of CAD", CAM and conventional cement retained implant-supported single crowns, 2016, pp.25, 103~108
- Coolidge ED, "The thickness of the human periodontal membrane", J Am Dent Assoc, 24, pp.1260~1270 (1937)
- Mandel U, "A biomechanical study of the human periodontal ligament", J Biomech, 19, pp.637~645 (1986)
- Chen XY, "Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing : a 3-dimensional finite element analysis", Implant Dent, 21, pp.340~343 (2012)
- Huang HL, "Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants : a three-dimensional finite element analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.466~472 (2005)
- Saidin S, "Effects of different implant-abutment connections on micromotion and stress distribution : prediction of microgap formation", J Dent, 40, pp.467~474 (2012)
- Wu T, "Design of a custom angled abutment for dental implants using computer-aided design and nonlinear finite element analysis", J Biomech, 43, pp.1941~1946 (2010)
- Gibbs CH, "Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission", J Prosthet Dent, 46, pp.443~449 (1981)
- Martin WC, "Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces", J Prosthet Dent, 86, pp.24~32 (2001)
- Bölükbaşı N, "Number and localization of the implants for the fixed prosthetic reconstructions : on the strain in the anterior maxillary region", Med Eng Phys, 37, pp.431~445 (2015)
- Gonda T, "Biomechanical factors associated with mandibular cantilevers: analysis with three-dimensional finite element models", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.e275~e282 (2014)
- Sotto-Maior BS, "Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.e13~e18 (2012)
- Cenkoglu BG, "The effect of the length and distribution of implants for fixed prosthetic reconstructions in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a finite element analysis", Materials(Basel), 12, pp.2556~ (2019)
- Kitamura E, "Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant-a three-dimensional finite element analysis", J Oral Rehabil, 32, pp.279~286 (2005)
- Sayyedi A, "Comparison of stress distribution in alveolar bone with different implant diameters and vertical cantilever length via the finite element method", J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 29, pp.37~43 (2019)
- Zhong J, "Effect of different implant configurations on biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported mandibular monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses", J Mech Behav Biomed, 102, pp.103490~ (2020)
- 박지만, "Three dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution around the mandibular posterior implant during non-working movement according to the amount of cantilever", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 6(5), pp.361~371 (2014), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Cassel B, "Deflections of an implant-supported cantilever beam subjected to vertically directed loads. In vitro measurements in three dimensions using an optoelectronic method. II Analysis of methodological errors", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.645~650 (2011)
- Stimmelmayr M, "Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface : a comparative in vitro study", Dent Mater, 28, pp.1215~1220 (2012)
- Almeida PJ, "Comparative analysis of the wear of titanium", titanium and titanium, abutment assemblies after thermocycling and mechanical loading, pp.Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac, 2016[DOI]
- Schwartz-Dabney C, "Edentulation alters material properties of cortical bone in the human mandible", J Dent Res, 81, pp.613~617 (2002)
- O’Mahony AM, "Anisotropic elastic properties of cancellous bone from a human edentulous mandible", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.415~421 (2000)
- O’Mahony AM, "Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading", Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, pp.648~657 (2001)
- Dong L, "Mechanical response of Ti-6Al-4V octet-truss lattice structures", Int J Solids Struct, 60-61, pp.107~124 (2015)
- Geng JP, "Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry : a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.585~598 (2001)
- Xu HH, "Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin", J Dent Res, 77, pp.472~480 (1998)
- Wataha JC, "Alloys for prosthodontic restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.351~363 (2002)
- Saskalauskaite E, "Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.262~268 (2008)
- Lanza A, "3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor", Dent Mater, 21, pp.709~715 (2005)