Effects of implant alignment and load direction on mandibular bone and implant: finite element analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of load direction, number of implants, and alignment of implant position on stress distribution in implant, prosthesis, and bone tissue. Materials and Methods: Four 3D models were made to simulate posterior mandible bone block: two implants and 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) with a pontic in the center (model M1), two implants and 3-unit FDP with a cantilever pontic at one end (model M2), FDP supported by three implants with straight line placement (model M3) and FDP supported by three implants with staggered implant configuration (model M4). The applied force was 120 N axially or 120 N obliquely. Results: Peak von Mises stresses caused by oblique occlusal force were 3.4 to 5.1 times higher in the implant and 3.5 to 8.3 times higher in the alveolar bone than those stresses caused by axial occlusal force. In model M2, the connector area of the distal cantilever in the prosthesis generated the highest von Mises stresses among all models. With the design of a large number of implants, low stresses were generated. When three implants were placed, there were no significant differences in the magnitude of stress between staggered arrangement and straight arrangement. Conclusion: The effect of staggering alignment on implant stress was negligible. However, the number of implants had a significant effect on stress magnitude. (J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2020;36(3): 176-82)
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of load direction, number of implants, and alignment of implant position on stress distribution in implant, prosthesis, and bone tissue. Materials and Methods: Four 3D models were made to simulate posterior mandible bone block: two implants and 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) with a pontic in the center (model M1), two implants and 3-unit FDP with a cantilever pontic at one end (model M2), FDP supported by three implants with straight line placement (model M3) and FDP supported by three implants with staggered implant configuration (model M4). The applied force was 120 N axially or 120 N obliquely. Results: Peak von Mises stresses caused by oblique occlusal force were 3.4 to 5.1 times higher in the implant and 3.5 to 8.3 times higher in the alveolar bone than those stresses caused by axial occlusal force. In model M2, the connector area of the distal cantilever in the prosthesis generated the highest von Mises stresses among all models. With the design of a large number of implants, low stresses were generated. When three implants were placed, there were no significant differences in the magnitude of stress between staggered arrangement and straight arrangement. Conclusion: The effect of staggering alignment on implant stress was negligible. However, the number of implants had a significant effect on stress magnitude. (J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2020;36(3): 176-82)
참고문헌 (12)
- Liao S, "Influence of trabecular bone on peri-implant stress and strain based on micro-CT finite element modeling of beagle dog", Biomed Res Int, 2016, pp.3926941~ (2016)
- de Souza Batista VE, "Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform : A 3-dimensional finite element analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.363~371 (2017)
- Sato Y, "Verification of the influence of the arrangement of implants on the load distribution(a well-known figure by Rangert)", J Oral Rehabil, 39, pp.446~449 (2012)
- Huang HL, "Stress analysis of implant-supported partial prostheses in anisotropic mandibular bone : in-line versus offset placements of implant", J Oral Rehabil, 33, pp.501~508 (2006)
- Alencar SMM, "FEA of peri-implant stresses in fixed partial denture prostheses with cantilevers", J Prosthodont, 26, pp.150~155 (2017)
- Misch CE, "A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss : Literature support", Implant Dent, 14, pp.108~116 (2005)
- Sertgöz A, "Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.165~169 (1996)
- Anami LC, "Finite element analysis of the influence of geometry and design of zirconia crowns on stress distribution", J Prosthodont, 24, pp.146~151 (2015)
- Merdji A, "Stress analysis in dental prosthesis", Comput Mater Sci, 49, pp.126~133 (2010)
- Rangert BR, "Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.360~370 (1997)
- Storelli S, "Implant supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in partially edentulous patients:Systematic review of the literature. Part I", Clin Oral Impl Res, 29(Suppl 18), pp.253~274 (2018)
- Wennström J, "Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function", J Clin Periodontol, 31, pp.1077~1083 (2004)