Rotational tolerances of a titanium abutment in the as-received condition and after screw tightening in a conical implant connection
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The success of an implant-prosthetic rehabilitation is influenced by good implant health and an excellent implant-prosthetic coupling. The stability of implant-prosthetic connection is influenced by the rotational tolerance between anti-rotational features on the implant and those on the prosthetic component. The aim of this study is to investigate the rotational tolerance of a conical connection implant system and its titanium abutment counterpart, in various conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS. 10 preparable titanium abutments, having zero-degree angulation (MegaGen, Daegu, Korea) with an internal 5-degree conical connection, and 10 implants (MegaGen, Daegu, Korea) were used. Rotational tolerance between the connection of implant and titanium abutments was measured through the use of a tridimensional optics measuring system (Quick Scope QS250Z, Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan) in the as-received condition (Time 0), after securing with a titanium screw tightening at 35 Ncm (Time 1), after tightening 4 times at 35 Ncm (Time 2), after tightening one more time at 45 Ncm (Time 3), and after tightening another 4 times at 45 Ncm (Time 4). RESULTS. The group “Time 0” had the lowest values of rotational freedom (0.22 ± 0.76 degrees), followed by the group Time 1 (0.46 ± 0.83 degrees), the group Time 2 (1.01 ± 0.20 degrees), the group Time 3 (1.30 ± 0.85 degrees), and the group Time 4 (1.49 ± 0.17 degrees). CONCLUSION. The rotational tolerance of a conical connection is low in the “as received” condition but increases with repetitive tightening and with application of a torque greater than 35 Ncm.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The success of an implant-prosthetic rehabilitation is influenced by good implant health and an excellent implant-prosthetic coupling. The stability of implant-prosthetic connection is influenced by the rotational tolerance between anti-rotational features on the implant and those on the prosthetic component. The aim of this study is to investigate the rotational tolerance of a conical connection implant system and its titanium abutment counterpart, in various conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS. 10 preparable titanium abutments, having zero-degree angulation (MegaGen, Daegu, Korea) with an internal 5-degree conical connection, and 10 implants (MegaGen, Daegu, Korea) were used. Rotational tolerance between the connection of implant and titanium abutments was measured through the use of a tridimensional optics measuring system (Quick Scope QS250Z, Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan) in the as-received condition (Time 0), after securing with a titanium screw tightening at 35 Ncm (Time 1), after tightening 4 times at 35 Ncm (Time 2), after tightening one more time at 45 Ncm (Time 3), and after tightening another 4 times at 45 Ncm (Time 4). RESULTS. The group “Time 0” had the lowest values of rotational freedom (0.22 ± 0.76 degrees), followed by the group Time 1 (0.46 ± 0.83 degrees), the group Time 2 (1.01 ± 0.20 degrees), the group Time 3 (1.30 ± 0.85 degrees), and the group Time 4 (1.49 ± 0.17 degrees). CONCLUSION. The rotational tolerance of a conical connection is low in the “as received” condition but increases with repetitive tightening and with application of a torque greater than 35 Ncm.
참고문헌 (44)
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- Fischer K, "Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT)on implant-supported full-arch maxillary prostheses. Part 1: sandblasted and acid-etched implants and mucosal tissue", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14, pp.808~815 (2012)
- Lekholm U, "Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 8, pp.178~186 (2006)
- Shalabi MM, "Implant surface roughness and bone healing : a systematic review", J Dent Res, 85, pp.496~500 (2006)
- Buser D, "Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions", Periodontol 2000, 73, pp.7~21 (2017)
- Kano SC, "A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.879~885 (2007)
- Kitagawa T, "Influence of implant", abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system, 2005, pp.75, 457~463
- Goodacre CJ, "Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.121~132 (2003)
- 채성욱, "Complication incidence of two implant systems up to six years: a comparison between internal and external connection implants", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 45(1), pp.23~29 (2015), 대한치주과학회
- Gracis S, "Internal vs. external connections for abutments", reconstructions: a systematic review, 2012, pp.23, 202~216
- Brånemark PI, "Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl, 16, pp.1~132 (1977)
- Rangert B, "Forces and moments on Brånemark implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 4, pp.241~247 (1989)
- Jemt T, "3-year followup study of early single implant restorations ad modum Brånemark", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 10, pp.340~349 (1990)
- Becker W, "Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations : a retrospective study", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.51~55 (1995)
- Goheen KL, "Torque generated by handheld screwdrivers and mechanical torquing devices for osseointegrated implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.149~155 (1994)
- Lee FK, "Critical bending moment of four implant-abutment interface designs", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.744~751 (2010)
- Binon PP, "Implants and components : entering the new millennium", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.76~94 (2000)
- Michalakis KX, "The effect of different implant-abutment connections on screw joint stability", J Oral Implantol, 40, pp.146~152 (2014)
- Prisco R, "Effect of aging and porcelain sintering on rotational freedom of internal-hex one-piece zirconia abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.1003~1008 (2013)
- Binon PP, "The effect of eliminating implant", abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability, 1996, pp.9, 511~519
- Nelson K, "Fabrication of a fixed retrievable implant-supported prosthesis based on electroforming: a technical report", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.591~595 (2008)
- Semper W, "Theoretical considerations : implant positional index design", J Dent Res, 88, pp.725~730 (2009)
- Sutter F, "The new restorative concept of the ITI dental implant system : design and engineering", Int J Periodont Restor Dent, 13, pp.409~431 (1993)
- Hernigou P, "One hundred and fifty years of history of the Morse taper:from Stephen A. Morse in 1864 to complications related to modularity in hip arthroplasty", Int Orthop, 37, pp.2081~2088 (2013)
- Bozkaya D, "Efficiency considerations for the purely tapered interference fit(TIF)abutments used in dental implants", J Biomech Eng, 126, pp.393~401 (2004)
- Ricciardi Coppedê A, "Effect of repeated torque", mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections : an in vitro study, 2009, pp.20, 624~632
- Coppedê AR, "Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading : an in vitro study", Int J Prosthodont, 22, pp.283~286 (2009)
- Yao KT, "Optimization of the conical angle design in conical implant-abutment connections : a pilot study based on the finite element method", J Oral Implantol, 44, pp.26~35 (2018)
- Blum K, "Fatigue induced changes in conical implant-abutment connections", Dent Mater, 31, pp.1415~1426 (2015)
- Mishra SK, "Microleakage at the different implant abutment interface : a systematic review", J Clin Diagn Res, 11, pp.ZE10~ZE15 (2017)
- Schmitt CM, "Performance of conical abutment(Morse Taper)connection implants : a systematic review", J Biomed Mater Res A, 102, pp.552~574 (2014)
- Tsuge T, "Marginal fit and microgaps of implant-abutment interface with internal anti-rotation configuration", Dent Mater J, 27, pp.29~34 (2008)
- de Barros Carrilho GP, "Comparison of external and internal hex implants’ rotational freedom : a pilot study", Int J Prosthodont, 18, pp.165~166 (2005)
- Salinas TJ, "Anti-rotational features for osseointegrated implants", Pract Proced Aesthet Dent, 13, pp.352~ (2001)
- Garine WN, "Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.928~938 (2007)
- Semper W, "Effects of repeated manual disassembly and reassembly on the positional stability of various implant-abutment complexes : an experimental study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.86~94 (2010)
- Semper-Hogg W, "Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.1017~1023 (2013)
- Binon PP, "The evolution and evaluation of two interference-fit implant interfaces", Postgrad Dent, 3, pp.3~13 (1996)
- Vigolo P, "An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.575~580 (2006)
- Lang LA, "The influence of abutment screw tightening on screw joint configuration", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.74~79 (2002)
- Binon PP, "Evaluation of machining accuracy and consistency of selected implants, standard abutments, and laboratory analogs", Int J Prosthodont, 8, pp.162~178 (1995)
- Dittmer S, "Effect of implant-abutment connection design on load bearing capacity and failure mode of implants", J Prosthodont, 20, pp.510~516 (2011)
- Rack T, "An in vitro pilot study of abutment stability during loading in new and fatigue-loaded conical dental implants using synchrotron-based radiography", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.44~50 (2013)
- Dailey B, "Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.251~256 (2009)