본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

외국 高句麗 인물화에 나타난 닭깃털관(鷄羽冠)과 高句麗의 위상

The Rooster Feathered Hat of Koguri in the East Asian Paintings and Artifacts

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

이 논문은 다음과 같은 연구를 더 심화시키는 연속 논문이다. ① 「高句麗ㆍ高麗의 나라이름(國名)에 관한 연구」를 하는 과정에서 검토한 ‘ - 서녘(西方)에서 부르는 ‘계귀(鷄貴)’를 중심으로 -」, 『高句麗渤海硏究』(50), 2014. ② 「춤무덤(舞踊塚)의 사신도와 조우관(鳥羽冠)에 대한 재검토 - 고구리(高句麗)의 닭 숭배 사상을 바탕으로-」, 『역사민속학』(46), 2014. 글쓴이는 ②의 논문에서 다음 두 가지 결론을 내렸다. 첫째, 지금까지 춤무덤에서 그려진 수탉 두 마리가 주작이라는 설이 일반화되었지만 그 수탉은 주작이 아니고 高句麗 사람들이 신으로 우러러 보는 닭의 신(鷄神)이라는 것을 3가지 사료를 새로 밝혀 증명하였다. 둘째, 지금까지 高句麗 사람들이 절풍에 꽂고 다닌 이른바 새 깃털로 만든 관(鳥羽冠)은 새 깃털이 아니라 닭 깃털로 만든 관(鷄羽冠)이라는 것을 밝혔다. 그리고 이와 같은 연구결과를 가지고 여러 곳의 高句麗 무덤 벽화에 그려진 깃털관이 사실은 닭 깃털로 만든 관(鷄羽冠)이라는 새로운 해석을 하였다. 이 논문에서는 이와 같은 연구의 연장선상에서 고구리(高句麗) 국내 뿐 아니라 외국에서 그린 그림들을 분석 검토하여 새로운 해석을 시도하는 것이 연구목적이다. 이 논문의 목적을 달성하기 위해 시대적으로는 양나라에서 당나라 이후까지, 지역으로는 일본에서 실크로드를 걸쳐 중아시아의 아프라시압까지 존재하는 절풍을 쓴 高句麗 인물화들을 가능한 한 모두 분석하였다. 그 결과 양나라 직공도, 당나라의 유물과 시, 일본에서 발견된 사신 그림, 돈황 벽화에 그려진 그림, 사마르칸트 아프라시압 벽화에서 발견된 高句麗 사람들은 모두 닭의 깃털을 꽂은 절풍, 곧 닭깃털관(鷄羽冠)을 쓰고 있었다는 것을 밝혔다. 다른 말로 하면 만약 이런 닭깃털관(鷄羽冠)이 없었다면 高句麗 사람이라는 것 자체를 알 수 없을 정도로 뚜렷한 高句麗 사람의 특징이고 이미지였다는 것을 알 수 있다. 이런 高句麗 사람의 닭깃털관(鷄羽冠) 이미지를 통해서 高句麗의 활동무대는 공간적으로 서역과 중앙아시아의 여러 나라와 한나라 이후 당나라, 그리고 일본까지 크넓은 국제사회 무대에서 활동하였고, 시간적으로는 668년 왕실이 당나라에 항복한 뒤로도 수 백 년 동안 그 명성이 이어진 高句麗의 높은 위상을 확인할 수 있었다.

Abstract

The present paper examined the examples of the rooster feathered hats of Koguri in East Asia figure paintings and artifacts, and tried to understand the significance of the Koguri type hat, and finally made the following conclusions drawn from those researches. 1. Among the examples of Koguri figure paintings found in the foreign countries, the earliest one was the Painting of the Portraits of Periodical Offering of Liang 梁職貢圖. The comparisons among the costumes and hairdress of the Three Kingdoms, Koguri, Paekche, and Silla show us that the most prominent feature of a Koguri envoy is the rooster feathered hat 鷄羽冠. 2. The painting of a Koguri figure painted on the dais of a Buddhist sculpture at Horyuji 法隆寺 in Japan is most likely a depiction of an envoy from Koguri, or a drawing done by someone from Koguri who knew the custom of the kingdom. It is only existing evidence of a painting of a human figure wearing a rooster feathered hat in Japan. 3. Next, the author examined the rooster feathered hat in the murals of the Tomb of Prince Zhanghuai of Tang. The date of the painting in 706, 38 years later than the collapse of Koguri, made some scholars to debate about the nationality of the envoy, either Palhae, Silla, or Koguri. The author argued that it is a Koguri envoy judging from two kinds of sources. The Koguri in the Painting of the Portraits of Periodical Offering of Liang and the envoy in the wall painting of the Prince Zhanghuai Tomb wear the same rooster feathered hat. It is different from a Silla envoy who is depicted without a feathered hat. Secondly, 『Fanyu zaming 梵語雜名』 called Kuri as Mu-kuri. Previously, it was assumed that the text was written 100 years after the collapse of Koguri and that Kuri in the text meant Palhae. However, the author suggested that 『Fanyu zaming 梵語雜名』 was actually based on the original text of 『Tang fan liang yu shuangdui ji 唐梵兩語雙對集』 written much before the establishment of the Tang(618). Hence, the wall painting in Li Xian’s Tomb must have drawn a Koguri envoy as they usually made tomb murals copied from a previous painting manual or based on the previous perception about a subject. 4. Four kinds of artifacts from the Tang dynasty were examined. 1) A silver bowl with the seven country names such as ① Konrun kingdom 崑崙王國 ② Paramun kingdom 婆羅門國 ③ Tobon kingdom 土蕃國 ④ Soruk kingdom 疏勒國 ⑤ Kori kingdom 高麗國 ⑥ Paekchok □kingdom 白拓□國 ⑦ Oman people 烏蠻人Five human figures in the fifth country called Kuri wear a rooster feathered hat. It is a scene of the distribution of a relic of the Buddha that eight countries including the Tang and the seven countries shared a sarira. 2) A sarira case with the illustration of Buddhist stories. It includes ‘the scene of carrying a funeral bier,‘ ’the scene of gathering of people riding an elephant and a horse,‘ ’ the scene of atlas figures moving a rock and taking out a jar,‘ and ’the scene of sharing a sarira.‘ In the last scene, there were two Koguri envoys with a rooster feathered hat. 3) A painting on a curtain to cover a sarira case placed in the underground chamber of a sarira pagoda. In the painting of ‘sharing a sarira,’ the figure on the right put his hands together as wearing a rooster feathered hat. 4) A sarira case with the title of ‘the kings from the eight countries including Emperor Qianyuan Xiaoyi 乾元孝義皇帝八國王等’ and with the depiction of eight country kings. Among them, there are a Koguri king and two vassals wearing a rooster feathered hat. The above mentioned artifacts deal with the Buddha’s relic. They showed the Tang-centered perspective. At the time of the death of the historical Buddha, eight countries divided the Buddha’s sarira and built a stupa. The Tang dynasty changed the story of sharing sarira with the Tang in the center and 7 neighboring countries. The Kuri was always included among the seven countries and it had not been changed even after the surrender of Kuri to the Tang. In those artifacts, only evidence to recognize a Koguri person is a rooster feathered hat. 5. Koguri cholpung 折風 hairdress is found in the poem written by the famous Tang poet, Li Bai 李白(701~762) about dancing of Kori music 高麗樂. The fact that Li Bai, born 33 years later than the surrender of Koguri, composed this poem shows us that Koguri dance had been still performed in the Tang royal court and the performer of the dance must have worn cholpung decorated with rooster feathers. 6. A rooster feathered hat of Koguri in the wall paintings of Dunhuang. (1) Early Tang (初唐, 618~712) : 3 caves(2) High Tang (盛唐, 713~755) : 3 caves(3) Mid Tang (中唐, 756~824) : 3 caves(4) Tibet (吐蕃) rule (781~848) : 9 caves(5) Late Tang (晚唐, 825~907) : 4 caves(6) Jinshan kingdom (金山国, 張議潮歸義軍, 851~1036) : 10 caves(7) Song (宋. 960~1036) : 1 cave(8) Xi Xia (西夏, 1032~1225) : 1 caveOnly nine caves are from the Tang period while 25 cave murals are from other countries such as Tibet. It corresponds to the record that in 『Biographies of the Eminent Monks [who Traveled to the] Western Regions in Search of the Law大唐求法高僧傳』, Yijing 義淨 said that ‘in the West, Kuri is called Kukkutesvara. Besides Cave No. 220, all murals were dated after the surrender of Koguri to the Tang. The reputation and the image of Koguri must have been persisted in the mind of local people and artisans. 7. The Afrasiab palace paintings contain a painting of foreign envoys on the west wall including Koguri wearing a rooster feathered hat. The identification of the envoy has been on debate whether it was from Silla or Koguri. The author defined them as Koguri personage for the following points. 1) The name of ‘Varxuman’ on the palace wall written in the Sogdian language is the same as fuhuman 拂呼縵 who was appointed as the Protectorate of Kangju 康居都督 in the yonghui 永徽 reign period of the Tang. Therefore, the painting was done with the direct observation of the Koguri envoy. 2) The Koguri person in the Painting of the Portraits of Periodical Offering of Liang and in the Dunhuang murals might have drawn a civil officer of Koguri. On the other hand, the Afrasiab figure wearing a long sword with a circular ring must have been a military officer. Their hairdress, cholpung, and clothing resemble to those of the Twin Pillars Tomb and the Niche Spirit Tomb while the long sword with a circular ring is the same as the one of a military guard of the Niche Spirit Tomb. 8. The above mentioned examples all show Koguri people wearing a rooster feathered hat 鷄羽冠. Without this kind of hairdress, one could not have recognized Koguri personage, and thus it was the most distinct characteristics of Koguri people. Through this famously fixed image of Koguri people, we can confirm the wide range of international activities of Koguri from China, Central Asia, and Japan, and the continuation of the reputation of Koguri even long after the collapse of the country in 668.

참고문헌 (95)

  1. 佛陀耶舍, "長阿含經", ~
  2. 西晉, "佛般泥洹經"
  3. "三國志", ~
  4. "後漢書", ~
  5. "南史", ~
  6. "舊唐書", ~
  7. "翰苑", ~
  8. 義淨, "大唐西域求法高僧傳", ~
  9. 김리나, "이기백선생고희기념 한국사학논총" (1994)
  10. 김원용, "사마르칸트 아프라시압 宮殿壁畵의 使節圖", 考古美術, 129 (1976)
  11. 노태돈, "예빈도에 보인 고구려" (2003), 서울대학교 출판부
  12. 박진욱, "아흐라샤브 궁전지 벽화의 고구려 사절도에 대하여", 조선고고연구
  13. 서길수, "‘高句麗’와 ‘高麗’의 소릿값(音價)에 관한 연구", 고구려발해연구, 27, pp.27~106 (2007), 고구려발해학회
  14. 서길수, "高句麗·高麗의 나라이름(國名)에 관한 연구(1) - 서녘(西方)에서 부르는 ‘계귀(鷄貴)’를 중심으로 -", 고구려발해연구, 50, pp.119~164 (2014), 고구려발해학회
  15. 서길수, "6세기 인도의 천하관(天竺=中國)과 高(句)麗의 위상에 관한 연구", 백산학보, (100), pp.309~383 (2014), 백산학회
  16. 서길수, "춤무덤(舞踊塚)의 사신도와 조우관(鳥羽冠)에 대한 재검토-고구리(高句麗)의 닭 숭배 사상을 바탕으로-", 역사민속학, (46), pp.41~90 (2014), 한국역사민속학회
  17. 정찬주, "둔황가는길" (2001), 김영사
  18. 정호섭, "鳥羽冠을 쓴 人物圖의 類型과 性格-외국 자료에 나타난 古代 한국인의 모습을 중심으로-", 영남학, (24), pp.87~123 (2013), 영남문화연구원
  19. 金維諾, "職貢圖的年代與作者 讀畵札記", 文物 (1960)
  20. 穴澤和光・馬目順一, "アフラミヤブ都城址 出土壁畵に見られる朝鮮人使節について", 朝鮮學報, 80 (1976)
  21. 梁職貢圖の高句麗使圖について, 文部省科學硏究費補助金 硏究成果報告書, "李成市", ~ (1986)
  22. 劉永增, "泉玉博古藏乾元銘石函の硏究", 泉玉博古館紀要, 6 (1990)
  23. 外山潔, "館藏舍利容器について(上)", 泉玉博古館紀要, 8 (1992)
  24. 李成市, "アジアにおける國際交流と地域文化" (1994)
  25. セゾン美術館, "シルクロ-ド都 長安の秘寶" (1992), 日本經濟新聞社
  26. 李成市, "アジアにおける國際交流と地域文化" (1994)
  27. 深津行德, "臺灣古宮博物院所藏 ‘梁職貢圖’模本について", 學習院大學 東洋文化硏究所 調査硏究報告, (44) (1999)
  28. 張達宏, "西安市文管會收藏的幾件珍貴文物", 考古與文物 (1984)
  29. 臨潼縣博物館, "臨潼縣慶山寺舍利塔基精室淸理記", 文博 (1985)
  30. 龐燼, "唐慶山寺舍利塔碑文校注全譯", 文博 (1988)
  31. 田中一美, "都管七個國盒の圖像とその用途", 佛敎藝術, 210 (1993)
  32. 韋川, "唐代金銀器之珍品-"都管七个國"六瓣銀盒", 收藏界 (2003)
  33. 梁曉强, "都管七个國六瓣銀盒辯证", 曲靖師范學院學報 (2010)
  34. "文博", 2011, ~
  35. 李新, "敦煌石窟壁畵古代朝鮮半島人物圖像調査硏究", 제2회 경주 실크로드 국제학술회의 자료집 (2013)
  36. 吴文星, "敦煌莫高窟壁画中的维摩诘经变研究" (2002), 华南师范大学
  37. 邹清泉, "莫高窟唐代坐帐维摩画像考论", 敦煌研究 (2012)
  38. 刘永增, "安西东千佛洞第5窟毗沙门天王与八大夜叉曼荼罗解说", 敦煌研究 (2006)
  39. 李军, "从供养人题记看莫高窟第9窟的建成时间", 西部考古 (2011)
  40. 胡同庆, "论莫高窟晚唐第9窟探筹图非投壶图", 敦煌研究 (2011)
  41. 魏健鹏, "生天与净土—莫高窟第9窟研究" (2012), 兰州大学
  42. 胡玲, "敦煌莫高窟唐代壁画不同时期代表窟女供养人服饰款型浅析", 读者欣赏(理论版) (2012)
  43. 范泉, "莫高窟第12窟供养人题记、图像新探", 敦煌研究 (2007)
  44. 张景峰, "敦煌莫高窟第9窟甬道供养人画像年代再探", 兰州学刊 (2009)
  45. 段文杰, "榆林窟第25窟壁画艺术探讨", 敦煌研究 (1987)
  46. 沙武田, "关于榆林窟第25窟营建时代的几个问题", 藏学学刊 (2009)
  47. 今枝由郎, "敦煌莫高窟和榆林窟中的T形题记框", 藏学学刊 (2009)
  48. 沙武田, "吐蕃统治时期敦煌石窟研究综述", 西藏研究 (2011)
  49. 沙武田, "莫高窟第61窟甬道壁画绘于西夏时代考", 西北第二民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版) (2006)
  50. 邹清泉, "莫高窟第61窟"维摩经变"新识", 美术学报 (2013)
  51. 公维章, "敦煌莫高窟第61窟屏风画"佛传·涅槃图"榜题研究", 敦煌研究 (2010)
  52. 李新, "敦煌石窟古代朝鲜半岛资料研究——莫高窟第61窟"五台山图"古代朝鲜半岛资料研究", 敦煌研究 (2013)
  53. 樊锦诗, "《中国文物古迹保护准则》在莫高窟项目中的应用——以《敦煌莫高窟保护总体规划》和《莫高窟第85窟保护研究》为例", 敦煌研究 (2007)
  54. 陈菊霞, "从莫高窟第85窟供养人看其营建和重修", 敦煌研究 (2011)
  55. 陈菊霞, "试析莫高窟第85窟绘塑内容的表现思想", 敦煌研究 (2011)
  56. 刘永增, "莫高窟第98窟是一忏法道场", 敦煌研究 (2012)
  57. 沙武田, "S.P.172与莫高窟五代宋窟顶壁画关系试论──敦煌壁画底稿研究之三", 敦煌研究 (2000)
  58. 米德昉, "敦煌莫高窟第100窟窟主及年代问题再议", 敦煌研究 (2012)
  59. 米德昉, "形制与图像:莫高窟第100窟设计思想探源", 中国美术研究 (2013)
  60. 段修业, "莫高窟第108窟酥碱起甲壁画的修复报告", 敦煌研究 (1990)
  61. 敖特根, "莫高窟北区出土回鹘蒙古文『入菩萨行论』印本残叶", 兰州学刊 (2009)
  62. 沙武田, "金光明最胜王经变", 敦煌归义军史专题研究四编, ~ (2009)
  63. 沙武田, "莫高窟第138窟智惠性供养像及相关问题研究", 敦煌学辑刊 (2006)
  64. 张景峰, "敦煌莫高窟第138窟供养人画像再认识", 艺术百家 (2009)
  65. 沙武田, "莫高窟第138窟智惠性供养像再探-兼谈与第138窟研究相关的几个问题", 敦煌归义军史专题研究四编 (2009)
  66. 李永宁, "敦煌莫高窟碑文录及有关问题(一)", 敦煌研究 (1982)
  67. 顾淑彦, "敦煌石窟贤愚经变研究", 석사, pp.2009
  68. 乔晴, "敦煌莫高窟第148窟乐舞壁画研究", 武汉音乐学院 (2010)
  69. 彭金章, "莫高窟第148窟密教内四外四供养菩萨考释", 敦煌研究 (2004)
  70. 陈明, "关于莫高窟第156窟的几个问题", 敦煌学辑刊 (2006)
  71. 郭俊叶, "敦煌壁画中的经架-兼议莫高窟第156窟前室室顶南侧壁画题材", 文物 (2011)
  72. 暨远志, "张议潮出行图研究-兼论唐代节度使旌节制度", 敦煌研究 (1991)
  73. 谢静, "敦煌莫高窟『吐蕃赞普礼佛图』中吐蕃族服饰初探", 敦煌学辑刊, 159(231) (2007)
  74. 李永宁, "敦煌莫高窟第159窟文殊、普贤赴会图-莫高窟第159窟初探之一", 敦煌研究 (1993)
  75. 沙武田, "敦煌莫高窟第158窟与粟特人关系试考", 艺术设计研究 (2010)
  76. 沙武田, "敦煌莫高窟第158窟与粟特人关系试考", 艺术设计研究 (2010)
  77. 吴健, "莫高窟雕塑数字化与艺术表现-以莫高窟第158窟三身雕塑为例", 敦煌研究 (2009)
  78. 谢雨珂, "从莫高窟194窟菩萨服饰看盛唐女礼服形态", 纺织科技进展 (2012)
  79. 柴勃隆, "莫高窟194窟漫漶壁画多光谱成像调查与研究", 敦煌研究 (2010)
  80. 胡朝阳, "论敦煌莫高窟第220窟维摩诘情感的艺术表现", 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (2004)
  81. 赵恺清, "中国唐代敦煌220窟维摩诘经变壁画与古代美洲波南帕克壁画比较", 美术教育研究 (2012)
  82. 施萍婷, "新定『阿弥陀经变』-莫高窟第225窟南壁龛顶壁画重读记", 敦煌研究 (2007)
  83. 白天佑, "莫高窟第231窟阴伯伦夫妇供养像解析", 敦煌研究 (2006)
  84. 王婧怡, "敦煌莫高窟壁画吐蕃赞普服饰考-翻领与云肩、靴及蹀躞带", 浙江纺织服装职业技术学院学报 (2009)
  85. 孙修身, "莫高窟佛教史迹故事画介绍(二)", 敦煌研究 (1982)
  86. 赵晓星, "吐蕃统治时期传入敦煌的中土图像-以五台山图为例", 文艺研究 (2010)
  87. 孙毅华, "窟新发现摩崖石刻", 敦煌研究 (1999)
  88. 吴文星, "敦煌莫高窟壁画中的维摩诘经变研究", 华南师范大学 (2002)
  89. 沙武田, "莫高窟吐蕃期洞窟第359窟供养人画像研究-兼谈粟特九姓胡人对吐蕃统治敦煌的态度", 敦煌研究 (2010)
  90. 张元林, "“观音救难”的形象图示-莫高窟第359窟西壁龛内屏风画内容释读", 敦煌研究 (2010)
  91. 郭俊叶, "莫高窟第454窟窟主再议", 敦煌研究 (1999)
  92. 沙武田, "莫高窟第454窟窟主的一点补充意见", 敦煌研究 (2003)
  93. 郭俊叶, "敦煌莫高窟第454窟天请问经变及相关问题", 敦煌研究 (2010)
  94. 郭俊叶, "莫高窟第454窟窟主及其甬道重修问题", 敦煌研究 (2014)
  95. 敦煌, "西千佛洞", 大陆桥视野 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)