중국지도자 신년사에 대한 양적 비교분석 —江澤民, 胡錦濤, 習近平 간 TTR, TF-IDF 비교를 중심으로—
A Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Chinese Leaders' New Year's Addresses: Focusing on the Comparison of TTR and TF-IDF among Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao, and Xi Jinping
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to quantitatively examine the extent to which the language of Chinese leaders reflects their respective historical contexts by analyzing the New Year's addresses delivered by Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao, and Xi Jinping from 1993 to 2022. To this end, the study performs a comprehensive linguistic analysis of thirty years of speeches, utilizing word frequency and Type-Token Ratio (TTR) analysis, TF- IDF-based keyword extraction, and era-specific keyword association analysis. The results, grounded in TTR and TF-IDF metrics, suggest that while Jiang and Hu tended to exhibit a conventional linguistic pattern characterized by repetition and formality, Xi appears to have adopted a more diverse and differentiated linguistic strategy. Furthermore, regarding era-specific keywords, the analysis indicates a shift in priorities: Jiang placed a relatively higher emphasis on elevating China's international status, Hu focused more on livelihood improvements for social harmony, while Xi seems to have prioritized political values to advance socialism with Chinese characteristics.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to quantitatively examine the extent to which the language of Chinese leaders reflects their respective historical contexts by analyzing the New Year's addresses delivered by Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao, and Xi Jinping from 1993 to 2022. To this end, the study performs a comprehensive linguistic analysis of thirty years of speeches, utilizing word frequency and Type-Token Ratio (TTR) analysis, TF- IDF-based keyword extraction, and era-specific keyword association analysis. The results, grounded in TTR and TF-IDF metrics, suggest that while Jiang and Hu tended to exhibit a conventional linguistic pattern characterized by repetition and formality, Xi appears to have adopted a more diverse and differentiated linguistic strategy. Furthermore, regarding era-specific keywords, the analysis indicates a shift in priorities: Jiang placed a relatively higher emphasis on elevating China's international status, Hu focused more on livelihood improvements for social harmony, while Xi seems to have prioritized political values to advance socialism with Chinese characteristics.