본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현대 국어 부정 의미의 표현 형식과 화용 체계 연구

Pragmatic System of Negation and Denial in Contemporary Korean Language

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

In Korean Linguistics, the negation and denial form and it's interpretation was one of the most attractive topics for many Korean linguists in the 70s to 80s. Attempts were made to apply two types of negation, long and short form negation, to Chomsky's generative-transformational grammar. After long debate, irrespective of the differences in form and usage, linguists concluded that the two types of Korean negation were derived from the same deep structure - the long form negation type was the basic and prototype form. However, this type of form-oriented research hindered investigation of dynamic negation expressions in communicative interactions and authentic contexts. In this paper, I examine the concepts of ‘negation' in terms of speech acts and conceptualize ‘negation' and ‘denial' related to ‘affirmation'. Then I explain that there are three ways to form negation in the Korean language. The first is to create a new word identifying the negative meaning. For example, the negative of ‘있다’ is not ‘안 있다’ but ‘없다’ and the negative of ‘알다’ is ‘모르다’ instead of ‘안 알다/알지 않다’. The second way is to use a negative prefix such as ‘비(非-), 미(未)-, 무(無)-, 부(不)-, 몰(沒)-’. And, finally, the third way is to make a negation sentence with negation adverbs or negation auxiliary verbs. For a practical approach to current Korean negation usage, we need to collect various authentic texts and analyze speakers' negation and denial intentions in context. In this paper, I explain that when a speaker expresses negation or denial intention the indirect speech act without negation form as well as the direct speech act with the negation form would be chosen. The attention of negation or denial can be interpreted not only from the meaning of the sentence but also from the presupposition, entailment and implicature of the utterances in a specific context. I anticipate further inquiry and research into the complex phenomenon and the principles of Korean language negation and denial speech acts.

Abstract

In Korean Linguistics, the negation and denial form and it's interpretation was one of the most attractive topics for many Korean linguists in the 70s to 80s. Attempts were made to apply two types of negation, long and short form negation, to Chomsky's generative-transformational grammar. After long debate, irrespective of the differences in form and usage, linguists concluded that the two types of Korean negation were derived from the same deep structure - the long form negation type was the basic and prototype form. However, this type of form-oriented research hindered investigation of dynamic negation expressions in communicative interactions and authentic contexts. In this paper, I examine the concepts of ‘negation' in terms of speech acts and conceptualize ‘negation' and ‘denial' related to ‘affirmation'. Then I explain that there are three ways to form negation in the Korean language. The first is to create a new word identifying the negative meaning. For example, the negative of ‘있다’ is not ‘안 있다’ but ‘없다’ and the negative of ‘알다’ is ‘모르다’ instead of ‘안 알다/알지 않다’. The second way is to use a negative prefix such as ‘비(非-), 미(未)-, 무(無)-, 부(不)-, 몰(沒)-’. And, finally, the third way is to make a negation sentence with negation adverbs or negation auxiliary verbs. For a practical approach to current Korean negation usage, we need to collect various authentic texts and analyze speakers' negation and denial intentions in context. In this paper, I explain that when a speaker expresses negation or denial intention the indirect speech act without negation form as well as the direct speech act with the negation form would be chosen. The attention of negation or denial can be interpreted not only from the meaning of the sentence but also from the presupposition, entailment and implicature of the utterances in a specific context. I anticipate further inquiry and research into the complex phenomenon and the principles of Korean language negation and denial speech acts.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
  2. 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어문법론" (2006), 커뮤니케이션북스
  3. 권재일, "한국어 문법론" (2012), 태학사
  4. 김동식, "현대국어 부정법의 연구", 석사, pp.1980
  5. 김동식, "국어연구 어디까지 왔나", pp.452~466 (1990), 동아출판사
  6. 김석득, "한국어 부정법에 대하여", 국어국문학, 53, pp.47~58 (1971)
  7. 남기심, "표준국어문법론 제3판" (2011), 탑출판사
  8. 남풍현, "국어 부정법의 발달", 문법연구, 3, pp.55~81 (1976)
  9. 노대규, "국어의 입말과 글말" (1996), 국학자료원
  10. 裵解銖, "國語 否定法 硏究", 석사, pp.1976
  11. 백봉자, "한국어의 부정과 그 범주", 연세어문학, 6, pp.31~50 (1975)
  12. 서상규, "국어 부정문의 의미 해석 원리", 말, 9, pp.41~79 (1984)
  13. 송석중, "A Note on Negation in Korean", Linguistics, 76, pp.59~76 (1973)
  14. 송석중, "한국말의 부정의 범위", 한글, 173, pp.327~351 (1981)
  15. 신기철, "새우리말큰사전" (1989), 삼성출판사
  16. 유동준, "국어 부정문의 화용론", 연세어문학, 14(15), pp.191~202 (1983)
  17. 이경우, "부정소 ‘아니’와 ‘못’의 의미", 국어교육, 44(45), pp.287~301 (1983)
  18. 이상복, "동사 ‘말다’에 대하여", 연세어문학, 12, pp.13~27 (1979)
  19. 이성범, "추론의 화용론" (2001), 한국문화사
  20. 이숭녕, "(현대)국어대사전" (1975), 한서출판사
  21. 이정민, "부정 명령의 분석", 어학연구, 13(2), pp.105~114 (1977)
  22. 이홍배, "국어 부정문 기술에 있어서의 문제점", 어학연구, 8(2), pp.60~77 (1972)
  23. 이환묵, "부정 표현 ‘아니’의 통사범주와 그 의미", 어학연구, 18(1), pp.139~155 (1982)
  24. 임홍빈, "부정법의 논의와 국어의 현실", 국어학, 6, pp.185~206 (1978)
  25. 임홍빈, "국어 부정문의 통사와 의미", 국어생활, 10, pp.72~99 (1987)
  26. 장경희, "국어 의문문의 긍정과 부정", 국어학, 11, pp.89~115 (1982)
  27. 장석진, "종합문법론-담화와 화용" (1994), 서울대학교 출판부
  28. 전병쾌, "한국어 부정구조의 분석 - 변형․생성문법적 고찰" (1984), 한신문화사
  29. 정희자, "담화와 추론" (2002), 한국문화사
  30. 최현배, "우리말본" (1961), 정음사
  31. 韓桔, "한국어 부정어에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1978
  32. 한정일, "부정문의 화용론", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1987
  33. 洪宗善, "國語否定法의 變遷硏究", 석사, pp.1981
  34. 황병순, "국어 부정법의 통시적 고찰", 어문학, 40, pp.119~138 (1980), 한국어문학회
  35. Asher R. E., "The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics" (1994), Pergamon Press
  36. Jackendoff, Ray S., "An Interpretive Theory of Negation", Foundations of Language, 5, pp.218~240 (1969)
  37. Katz, J. J., "Philosophy of Language" (1966), Harp & Row Publishers
  38. Quirk, R., "A Grammar of Contemporary English" (1985), Longman

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)