Neg-Raising in Korean: An Experimental Pragmatic Analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Negation has garnered considerable interest over last couple of decades in syntax since generative-transformational grammar. In the generative-transformational grammar, the meanings of negative main sentences with subordinate clauses and sentences with negations of the subordinate clause are the same. However, these two sentences certainly have different meanings and intentions why negations in different sites are so frequently used in our daily conversation. In this study, we investigate whether Neg-Raising interpretations are restricted to cases where they carry only the smallest functional load and whether NR interpretations are applied in Korean. Moreover, we categorize five types Korean verb which are regarded as generating NR interpretation to observe which verb type has the strongest NR interpretations, which type has the weakest or which one does not have them. To support the research, we use e-prime 2.0 tool for two experiments
Abstract
Negation has garnered considerable interest over last couple of decades in syntax since generative-transformational grammar. In the generative-transformational grammar, the meanings of negative main sentences with subordinate clauses and sentences with negations of the subordinate clause are the same. However, these two sentences certainly have different meanings and intentions why negations in different sites are so frequently used in our daily conversation. In this study, we investigate whether Neg-Raising interpretations are restricted to cases where they carry only the smallest functional load and whether NR interpretations are applied in Korean. Moreover, we categorize five types Korean verb which are regarded as generating NR interpretation to observe which verb type has the strongest NR interpretations, which type has the weakest or which one does not have them. To support the research, we use e-prime 2.0 tool for two experiments
참고문헌 (24)
- 김동식, "‘부정법’ 국어 연구 어디까지 왔나" (1986), 동아출판사
- 박상수, "동사이동의 재분석, Do-지원의 동인, 그리고 축약 부정조동사의 문법화", 언어과학연구, (48), pp.159~179 (2009), 언어과학회
- 박인진, "언어에 담긴 정보", 언어과학연구, (33), pp.89~110 (2005), 언어과학회
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 윤희수, "몇몇 영어 구문의 문법성에 대한 환유의 설명력", 언어과학연구, 35, pp.89~106 (2005), 언어과학회
- 임홍빈, "‘부정법’, 문법 연구와 자료" (1998), 태학사
- An, D. H., "On the Distribution of NPIs in Korean", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.317~350 (2007)
- Deutscher, M., "A Note on Saying and Believing", Analysis, 105, pp.53~57 (1965)
- Geis, M., "On Invited Inferences", Linguistic Inquiry, 2, pp.561~565 (1971)
- Greenberg, J. H., "Universals of Language" (1966), MIT Press
- Hintikka, J., "Knowledge and Belief" (1962), Cornell University Press
- Horn, L.R., "Some Aspects of Negation: In Universals of Human Language" (1978), Stanford University Press
- Horn, L. R., "A Natural History of Negation" (1989), University of Chicago Press
- Israel, M., "The Pragmatics of Polarity, In The Handbook of Pragmatics" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
- Jespersen, O., "Negation in English and Other Languages" (1917), Allen & Unwin
- Kilma, E., "Negation in English, In The Structure of Language" (1964), Prenctice-Hall
- Lakoff, G., "Pronominalization, Negation and the Analysis of Adverbs, In Readings in English Transformation Grammar" (1970), Ginn
- Levinson, S., "Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature" (2000), MIT Press
- Partee, B. H., "The Semantics of Belief-Sentences, In Approaches to Natural Languages" (1970), Redidel
- Prince, E., "The Syntax and Semantics of Neg-Raising with Evidence from French", Language, 52, pp.404~426 (1976)
- Quine, W. V. O., "Word and Object" (1960), MIT Press
- Ramat, P., "Linguistic Typology", ~ (1987)
- Sheintuch, G., "On the Pragmatic Unity of the Rules of Neg-Raising and Neg-Attraction" (1976), University of Chicago
- Tieu, L. S., "Neg-raising and NPIs in Korean", LSA 2012 (2012)