화법교육의 연구 현황과 전망
Research Trend in and Prospects for Speech Communication Education
1
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Our discussion about speech communication education(henceforth abbreviated as SCE) has been ongoing since the introduction of the communication theory. Heated debates are frequently observed due to the development of civil democracy and the spread of mass media such as radio, TV and movies. Research may start with microanalysis and ends with macroanalysis, or vice versa. The definition of SCE became a philosophy, which regulates the range of the study. The philosophy developed from the theory of SCE, to a close examination of the topic through discourse analysis, then to the practice and evaluation of the theory. Research trends in and prospects for SCE were discussed within a matrix of education phenomenal strata and research viewpoints. The education phenomenal strata were divided into five substrata: philosophical, theoretical, analytical, practical, and meta-evaluational strata. The research viewpoints were divided into six subgroups: formal, functional, historical, cultural, thinking & problem- solving, and individual/group developmental viewpoints. The results of this study are as follows:First, research interest in SCE has expanded from a traditional education of public speech to practical education of speech communication such as debates, discourse, interviews, and presentations. Second, current research in SCE has a tendency to pay more attention to the speaker-hearer relationship and their emotional domain. It might be caused by the prevalence of the functional viewpoint of SCE in which communication strategies are emphasized. Third, there is a new approach to SCE in which an individual's speech communication cannot be understood from the contemporary aspect of his/ her speech; it should be considered from a historical perspective, instead. Hence, the need for a diachronic perspective in SCE. Fourth, it is necessary that we should discuss SCE from a long-term perspective such as SCE for a Unified Korea in the future. We already live in a society which requires us to offer not only SCE to students from multi-cultural backgrounds, but also SCE to students who emigrated from North Korea. Fifth, researchers came to recognize the importance of an alternative and creative thinking, which can be enhanced by encouraging the students to solve their problems through discussion. And finally, the horizon of the research in SCE has been expanded from the discussion about an individual's speech communication to the discussion about the relational speech communication, then to the discussion about SCE with a group developmental viewpoint. Further research on SCE should reflect the current trends in SCE and include a systematic and comprehensive discussion within a matrix of philosophical, theoretical, analytical, and practical strata. We need new theories or models which can be applied to experimental or action research, and discussions about meta-evaluation are also required.
Abstract
Our discussion about speech communication education(henceforth abbreviated as SCE) has been ongoing since the introduction of the communication theory. Heated debates are frequently observed due to the development of civil democracy and the spread of mass media such as radio, TV and movies. Research may start with microanalysis and ends with macroanalysis, or vice versa. The definition of SCE became a philosophy, which regulates the range of the study. The philosophy developed from the theory of SCE, to a close examination of the topic through discourse analysis, then to the practice and evaluation of the theory. Research trends in and prospects for SCE were discussed within a matrix of education phenomenal strata and research viewpoints. The education phenomenal strata were divided into five substrata: philosophical, theoretical, analytical, practical, and meta-evaluational strata. The research viewpoints were divided into six subgroups: formal, functional, historical, cultural, thinking & problem- solving, and individual/group developmental viewpoints. The results of this study are as follows:First, research interest in SCE has expanded from a traditional education of public speech to practical education of speech communication such as debates, discourse, interviews, and presentations. Second, current research in SCE has a tendency to pay more attention to the speaker-hearer relationship and their emotional domain. It might be caused by the prevalence of the functional viewpoint of SCE in which communication strategies are emphasized. Third, there is a new approach to SCE in which an individual's speech communication cannot be understood from the contemporary aspect of his/ her speech; it should be considered from a historical perspective, instead. Hence, the need for a diachronic perspective in SCE. Fourth, it is necessary that we should discuss SCE from a long-term perspective such as SCE for a Unified Korea in the future. We already live in a society which requires us to offer not only SCE to students from multi-cultural backgrounds, but also SCE to students who emigrated from North Korea. Fifth, researchers came to recognize the importance of an alternative and creative thinking, which can be enhanced by encouraging the students to solve their problems through discussion. And finally, the horizon of the research in SCE has been expanded from the discussion about an individual's speech communication to the discussion about the relational speech communication, then to the discussion about SCE with a group developmental viewpoint. Further research on SCE should reflect the current trends in SCE and include a systematic and comprehensive discussion within a matrix of philosophical, theoretical, analytical, and practical strata. We need new theories or models which can be applied to experimental or action research, and discussions about meta-evaluation are also required.
참고문헌 (16)
- 권순희, "대인 화법의 교수·학습 방법 모색", 화법연구, (16), pp.31~61 (2010), 한국화법학회
- 권순희, "국어연감 2011", pp.242~294 (2011), 국립국어원
- 김규훈, "공감적 듣기교육 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2008
- 김진우, "언어와 의사소통-수사학과 화용론의 만남-" (1994), 한신문화사
- 박상진, "공감적 듣기 교육 방안 연구", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2011
- 이돈희, "교과교육학 탐구" (1994), 교육과학사
- 이창덕, "삶과 화법" (2000), 도서출판 박이정
- 임금선, "공감적 화법 능력 신장을 위한 비언어적 표현 교육 방안 연구 : 중·고등학교 듣기·말하기 영역을 중심으로", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2008
- 임칠성, "화법의 관계 연구", 화법연구, (20), pp.365~388 (2012), 한국화법학회[DOI]
- 전영우, "신국어 화법론" (1998), 태학사
- 전은주, "말하기·듣기의 본질적 개념과 교육과정 구성 방안 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1999
- 정상섭, "공감적 화법 교육 연구", 박사, 초등국어교육, pp.2006
- 한준상, "학습학" (2002), 일지사
- Griffin, E., "첫눈에 반한 커뮤니케이션 이론", pp.656~677 (2012), 커뮤니케이션북스
- Marshall B. Rosenberg, "Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life: Create Your Life" (2003), Puddle Dancer Press
- Stewart, J., "Interpersonal Communication Contact Between Persons", pp.13~30 (1990), McGraw-Hill
