본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

베트남인 한국어 학습자의 한자어 오류 양상 연구- 중급 학습자의 작문 자료 분석을 중심으로 -

A Study on Errors of Sino-Korean by Vietnamese Learners - With Writing Materials Analysis

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Vietnamese Korean-learners usually find that Sino-Korean is one of the most interesting points when learning Korean. Therefore, in their writing they tend to exploit Sino-Korean as much as they do with Sino- Vietnamese in their mother tongue. Despite of being borrowed words from Chinese, Sino-Korean and Sino-Vietnamese have certain differences in meaning, usage and part of speech which make learners confused, especially in writing. With 90 writing materials collected from Vienamese learners of intermediate level, this study focuses on analyzing common Sino-Korean misuses by Vietnamese learners. The Vietnamese-Sino errors can be categorized into three groups: meaning different errors (due to back- translation from Vietnamese), same form - different meaning error, same form – different part of speech. By classifying Sino-Korean errors made by Vietnamese learners this study aims at applying the error analysis results not only into vocabulary learning as has been done in some studies but also in improving writing skills. For learners, by knowing the common misuses, they should be more cautious when using Sino-Korean. For instructors, the error analysis of Sino-Korean misuses can be applied to improve teaching writing skills, e.g. collecting basic same form-same meaning Sino vocabulary for elementary level and notice students not to do back-translation to make Vietnamese style Sino-Korean; acknowledging differences of meaning between same form Sino-Korean and Sino-Vietnamese, comparing and explaining the differences of meaning between same form Sino-Korean and Sino-Vietnamese for intermediate level; focusing on analysis the usage and part of speech of Sino-Korean for the advanced level and applying on writing. In summary, based on the analysis Vietnamese learners writing materials this study could propose a classification of errors of Sino-Korean. Though not being completely accurate, the classification may help both learners and teachers to enhance knowledge and improve the teaching of Korean writing skills.

Abstract

Vietnamese Korean-learners usually find that Sino-Korean is one of the most interesting points when learning Korean. Therefore, in their writing they tend to exploit Sino-Korean as much as they do with Sino- Vietnamese in their mother tongue. Despite of being borrowed words from Chinese, Sino-Korean and Sino-Vietnamese have certain differences in meaning, usage and part of speech which make learners confused, especially in writing. With 90 writing materials collected from Vienamese learners of intermediate level, this study focuses on analyzing common Sino-Korean misuses by Vietnamese learners. The Vietnamese-Sino errors can be categorized into three groups: meaning different errors (due to back- translation from Vietnamese), same form - different meaning error, same form – different part of speech. By classifying Sino-Korean errors made by Vietnamese learners this study aims at applying the error analysis results not only into vocabulary learning as has been done in some studies but also in improving writing skills. For learners, by knowing the common misuses, they should be more cautious when using Sino-Korean. For instructors, the error analysis of Sino-Korean misuses can be applied to improve teaching writing skills, e.g. collecting basic same form-same meaning Sino vocabulary for elementary level and notice students not to do back-translation to make Vietnamese style Sino-Korean; acknowledging differences of meaning between same form Sino-Korean and Sino-Vietnamese, comparing and explaining the differences of meaning between same form Sino-Korean and Sino-Vietnamese for intermediate level; focusing on analysis the usage and part of speech of Sino-Korean for the advanced level and applying on writing. In summary, based on the analysis Vietnamese learners writing materials this study could propose a classification of errors of Sino-Korean. Though not being completely accurate, the classification may help both learners and teachers to enhance knowledge and improve the teaching of Korean writing skills.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 윤여탁, "한국어교육에서 문화의 위상과 역할", 국어교육연구, 7 (2000), 서울대학교 교육종합연구원 국어교육연구소
  2. 윤여탁, "외국인을 대상으로 한 한국어교육의 제문제", 한국어문연구, (창간) (2001), 교대만정치대학교 한국어학과
  3. 윤혜숙, "베트남인 한국어 학습자의 어휘 오류 분석 및 교육 방안 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2004
  4. 임보라, "한국어와 베트남어의 동원 기표 한자어의 대조 연구 : 모국어 전이 현상을 중심으로", 석사, 동남·남아시아어문학, pp.2004
  5. 조명숙, "So sánh lớp từ Hán Hàn trong tiếng Ha`n và lớp từ Hán Việt trong tiếng Việt-한국한자어와 베트남한자어 비교 연구-", 박사, pp.2003
  6. 崔友瑛, "외국어로서의 한국어 학습자의 오류에 대한 연구 : 작문에 나타난 오류를 중심으로", 석사, 한국학, pp.1997
  7. Cao Xuan Hao, "Tiếng Việt, văn Việt, người Viêt", pp.16~18 (2003), Nhà Xuất bản Trẻ
  8. Corder, "Error Analysis and Interlanguage", pp.10~11 (1981), Oxford University of Press
  9. Krashen, "Newmark's Ignorance Hypothesis and Current Second Language Acquisition", pp.125~126 (1981), Newbury House
  10. Le Tuan Son, "한국어와 베트남어의 한자음 비교 연구 : 성모와 운모를 중심으로", 석사, 국어학, pp.2006
  11. Luu Tuan Anh, "한국 한자어와 베트남 한자어의 대조 분석 연구 : 한국 한자어의 어휘교육을 위하여", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
  12. Ly Kinh Hien, "한국어와 베트남어의 한자어 어휘의 초보 연구", 석사, pp.2009
  13. Nguyen Thi Huong Sen, "베트남인 초급 학습자를 위한 한국어 쓰기교육방안 연구", 석사, pp.2006
  14. Nguyễn Kim Thản, "Tiếng Việt trên đường phát triển", Nhà Xuất bản Khoa học Xã hội, ~ (1982)
  15. Sharma B., "Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis, Interlanguage, and Other Useful Fads", MLJ, 63(252), pp.21~22 (1979)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)