본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『광제비급향약오십종치법』과 『광제비급』의 어휘 연구

A Study of the Vocabulary in the Gwangjebigeup Hyangyak Osipjongchibeop and Gwangjebigeup

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the vocabulary in Gwangjebigeup Hyangyak Osipjongchibeop which is UC Berkeley and Gwangjebigeup which was published in 1790 by classifying the words into Hyangyak terminology and other vocabulary. The conclusion is summarizing the discussion. First, The source text of UC Berkeley version is the 'Hangyak danbangchiheom' of Gwangjebigeup vol. Ⅳ, and was composed of two books(乾,坤) which are made through translating Gwangjebigeup vol. Ⅳ into Korean. Now the one book(乾) is extant. But there is no proof who was the translator or transcriber. Second, There is no doubt that this book was transcribed after 18th century at the least, because the source text was published in 1790. And according to phonological phenomena-the alternation of ‘ㄹㄹ’ into ‘ㄹㄴ’, duplicate writing of final consonant, labialization, palatalization, this book is thought to reflect Korean after the last years of the 18th century. But in the point of view of lexicology, the presumption of manuscription time is difficult because this book covered the Modern Korean vocabulary rarely. But it is sure that this book reflects some dialects of transcriber and involved many words which could not find in other books or dictionary. Third, pure Korean Hyangyak terminology that were not found in other medicine books are ‘seunggamcho, soebideum, hwanggyeongnamu, gulgeunkong, bulgeunjanphach, budeuljonguigoch, keunmaneul, chamssuk, jwisonpul, bupyeongmareum, chosyeogi, chamdae, dangjwiyeom, waksae, yeonbap, hyeonggaepul, danggwikkori, gobaekban, chosamnok, jigeomi, nureunbori, kkochdaji, jjokmaneul, amjwiddong, bisddae, saengjopssalbap, jinawi, soemareunddong, naphyangdoyajigireum, myeojusok, bungamcho, muldosgogi, soeyaji, damdugu, ddondeongi, pasoknureungogaengi’. Hyangyak terminology which seemed to be dialect type are ‘geomdai, doekgori, doesgomi, meorikkeul, monji, bosjang, meyeokuichum, seunauiojom. And Chinese names are ‘薥米, 泡水, 京墨, 烏豆, 黃明膠, 東流水, 黃麥, 油髮灰, 地漿蒜水, 滄塩, 豉湯’. The words which is difficult to figure out the form and meaning are ‘biramyeon’. Forth, the general words which must be registered in dictionary are ‘gogisil, ushaneul, pissaragi, dollimyeokjil, dolmungchi, mulsaengseon, bbul, noknani, deungmal, gariddae, daekeon, jilcheokhada, jaji, tunggeureus’. Also dialect words are ‘gyeopbul, gop, mungtunghada, beongeoriro, bisguro, gakguro, saeksseuda, jjoksukgarak, jageunsuksul, eojireuchida, ipseuri, jopda, juyeoneohda, komaro, The words which is difficult to figure out the form and meaning are ‘sinreulbeolle’. The special aspect about the UC Berkeley version is that this book contains many rare and unusual words. Furthermore these words must be registered the dictionary, and the meaning of lexical history should be described. This will allow database establishment and systematic description of Hyangyak terminology. Also the time of transcription must be revealed by accurate phonological analysis. These work will contribute to the extension of Korean and the description of Korean lexicon system.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the vocabulary in Gwangjebigeup Hyangyak Osipjongchibeop which is UC Berkeley and Gwangjebigeup which was published in 1790 by classifying the words into Hyangyak terminology and other vocabulary. The conclusion is summarizing the discussion. First, The source text of UC Berkeley version is the 'Hangyak danbangchiheom' of Gwangjebigeup vol. Ⅳ, and was composed of two books(乾,坤) which are made through translating Gwangjebigeup vol. Ⅳ into Korean. Now the one book(乾) is extant. But there is no proof who was the translator or transcriber. Second, There is no doubt that this book was transcribed after 18th century at the least, because the source text was published in 1790. And according to phonological phenomena-the alternation of ‘ㄹㄹ’ into ‘ㄹㄴ’, duplicate writing of final consonant, labialization, palatalization, this book is thought to reflect Korean after the last years of the 18th century. But in the point of view of lexicology, the presumption of manuscription time is difficult because this book covered the Modern Korean vocabulary rarely. But it is sure that this book reflects some dialects of transcriber and involved many words which could not find in other books or dictionary. Third, pure Korean Hyangyak terminology that were not found in other medicine books are ‘seunggamcho, soebideum, hwanggyeongnamu, gulgeunkong, bulgeunjanphach, budeuljonguigoch, keunmaneul, chamssuk, jwisonpul, bupyeongmareum, chosyeogi, chamdae, dangjwiyeom, waksae, yeonbap, hyeonggaepul, danggwikkori, gobaekban, chosamnok, jigeomi, nureunbori, kkochdaji, jjokmaneul, amjwiddong, bisddae, saengjopssalbap, jinawi, soemareunddong, naphyangdoyajigireum, myeojusok, bungamcho, muldosgogi, soeyaji, damdugu, ddondeongi, pasoknureungogaengi’. Hyangyak terminology which seemed to be dialect type are ‘geomdai, doekgori, doesgomi, meorikkeul, monji, bosjang, meyeokuichum, seunauiojom. And Chinese names are ‘薥米, 泡水, 京墨, 烏豆, 黃明膠, 東流水, 黃麥, 油髮灰, 地漿蒜水, 滄塩, 豉湯’. The words which is difficult to figure out the form and meaning are ‘biramyeon’. Forth, the general words which must be registered in dictionary are ‘gogisil, ushaneul, pissaragi, dollimyeokjil, dolmungchi, mulsaengseon, bbul, noknani, deungmal, gariddae, daekeon, jilcheokhada, jaji, tunggeureus’. Also dialect words are ‘gyeopbul, gop, mungtunghada, beongeoriro, bisguro, gakguro, saeksseuda, jjoksukgarak, jageunsuksul, eojireuchida, ipseuri, jopda, juyeoneohda, komaro, The words which is difficult to figure out the form and meaning are ‘sinreulbeolle’. The special aspect about the UC Berkeley version is that this book contains many rare and unusual words. Furthermore these words must be registered the dictionary, and the meaning of lexical history should be described. This will allow database establishment and systematic description of Hyangyak terminology. Also the time of transcription must be revealed by accurate phonological analysis. These work will contribute to the extension of Korean and the description of Korean lexicon system.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 김남경, "구급방류 의서 연구" (2016), 景仁文化社
  2. 김동소, "한국어의 역사" (2007), 정림사
  3. 김병제, "방언사전" (1980), 과학백과사전출판사
  4. 김신근, "한의약서고" (1989), 서울대출판부
  5. 김영배, "평안방언연구(자료편)" (1997), 태학사
  6. 김이협, "평북방언사전" (1981), 한국정신문화연구원
  7. 金鍾學, "鄕藥文獻에 나타난 藥材名語彙 硏究", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1988
  8. 김태균, "함북방언사전" (1986), 경기대출판국
  9. 남광우, "교학 고어사전" (1997), 교학사
  10. 문세영, "우리말사전" (1950), 삼문사
  11. 박상영, "아사미문고 언해본 『廣濟秘笈鄕藥五十種治法』 발굴과 그 의의", 한국한의학연구원논문집, 17(1), pp.69~74 (2011), 한국한의학연구원
  12. 박용규, "문세영 조선어사전의 편찬 과정과 국어사전사적 의미", 동방학지, (154), pp.259~300 (2011), 국학연구원
  13. 三木榮, "조선의서지" (1956), 학술도서간행회
  14. 森爲三, "조선식물명휘" (1922), 조선총독부학무국
  15. 손병태, "향약 약재명의 국어학적 연구", 박사, pp.1996
  16. 송창선, "마경초집언해의 어휘 연구", 경산어문학, 1, pp.35~58 (1995), 경산대 국문과
  17. 신중진, "『硏經齋全集』에 실린 <稻 벼> 穀物名에 대한 어휘사적 연구", 동아시아문화연구, (52), pp.83~118 (2012), 동아시아문화연구소
  18. 신중진, "『硏經齋全集』에 실린 雜穀名에 대한 어휘체계사 연구", 동아시아문화연구, (56), pp.101~134 (2014), 동아시아문화연구소
  19. 여강출판사, "동의학사전" (1989)
  20. 유창돈, "이조어사전" (1987), 연세대출판부
  21. 이기갑, "전남 방언 사전" (1998), 태학사
  22. 이은규, "『향약구급방』의 국어학적 연구", 박사, pp.1993
  23. 이은규, "필사본 『우역방』 연구-이본과의 비교를 중심으로", 어문학, 63, pp.45~65 (1998), 한국어문학회
  24. 이은규, "『구급신방』의 표기와 음운", 언어과학연구, 16, pp.459~481 (1999), 언어과학회
  25. 이은규, "<백병 구급 신방>의 표기와 음운 고찰", 언어과학연구, 27, pp.315~338 (2003), 언어과학회
  26. 이은규, "소창문고본 『우역방』에 대하여", 국어교육연구, 36, pp.171~190 (2004), 국어교육학회
  27. 이은규, "향약명 어휘의 변천 연구", 국어교육연구, (45), pp.475~520 (2009), 국어교육학회(since1969)
  28. 이은규, "필사본 『두역신방』의 국어학적 연구", 언어과학연구, (55), pp.191~216 (2010), 언어과학회
  29. 이은규, "구급방류 의서의 병명 번역 양상", 한국말글학, 27, pp.77~119 (2010), 한국말글학회
  30. 이은규, "『구급신방』의 어휘 분석", 한국말글학, 28, pp.169~227 (2011), 국말글학회
  31. 이은규, "『백병구급신방』의 어휘 연구", 민족문화논총, (49), pp.253~278 (2011), 민족문화연구소
  32. 이은규, "향약명 어휘 연구의 현황과 과제", 정신문화연구, 37(4), pp.95~136 (2014), 한국학중앙연구원
  33. 이은규, "『본초정화(本草精華)』의 향약명 어휘에 대하여", 국어교육연구, (57), pp.195~222 (2015), 국어교육학회(since1969)
  34. 李喆鏞, "의약서 어휘의 국어사적 연구", 박사, 국어국문, pp.1992
  35. 차웅석, "『광제비급』에 대한 서지학적 연구", 석사, 한의학과, pp.1997
  36. 한글학회, "우리말큰사전 4-옛말과 이두" (1992), 어문각
  37. 홍문각, "광재물보(한글색인)" (1998), 영인본
  38. 홍윤표, "근대 국어 연구(1)" (1984), 태학사
  39. 홍윤표, "소당 천시권 박사 화갑기념국어학논총", pp.747~773 (1985), 간행위원회
  40. 황용주, "≪朝鮮語辭典≫의 편찬과 현대 한국어문학 - ≪朝鮮語辭典≫의 출판 이력과 사전 ‘일러두기’를 중심으로", 반교어문연구, (42), pp.99~132 (2016), 반교어문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)