漢和辭典 咸·深攝韻 字音 규정의 문제점

Abstract

This paper discusses the Sino-Japanese classification of characters that belong to group Xian(咸) and Shen (深) among 2,136 new usual Sino-Japanese characters(2010) in six Sino-Japanese dictionaries, and the following conclusions were drawn. 1)Final-P was recorded as an old Kana notation Fu[フ] in the every dictionary, but Final-M was recorded as an old Kana notation Mu[ム] in only the dictionary of Gakkenkyoiku. 2)The type of Q[ッ] and Tsu[ツ] of Final-P was provided as a Kan’yo’on in the many dictionaries. But Q[ッ] of Final-P can not be provided as a Kan’yo’on because Q[ッ] of Final-T and Final-K are not provided as a Kan’yo’on in the all of dictionaries. Additionally, Tsu[ツ] of Final-P can not be provided as a Kan’yo’on because Tsu[ツ] notation of Final-P is familiar to original sound more than the vowel u changed from Fu[フ]. Therefore, the type of Q[ッ] and Tsu[ツ] of Final-P must be classified as a Go’on or Kan'on according to the Kana notition for the exception of Q[ッ] and Tsu[ツ]. 3)Main vowel of rhyme Yan(嚴) appears as a three type [a], [o], [e] in Go’on. However, the main vowel of the same character of rhyme Yan(嚴) recorded differently as an [a], [o], [e] in the many dictionaries. Therefore, Go’on of rhyme Yan(嚴) must be provided after checking which type appears as an [a], [o], [e] in old Go’on text. 4)Main vowel of Fan(凡) appears as an [o] in Go’on text. But main vowel of rhyme Fan(凡) was recorded as an [a] in some dictionaries. 5)Main vowel of rhyme Qin(侵) type B appears as an [o] or [i] in Go’on. But the main vowel of the same character of rhyme Qin(侵) type B recorded differently as an [o] or [i] in the many dictionaries. Therefore, Go’on of rhyme Qin(侵) type B must be provided after that checking which type appears as an [o] or [i] in old Go’on text.