보조사 ‘뿐’의 분포와 의미
A Study on the Distribution and Meaning of the Auxiliary Particle “ppun”
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study identifies the meaning and distributive characteristics of the auxiliary particle “ppun” by analyzing corpus examples. Thus far, “ppun” has generally been known to have a limited distribution. However, according to the observation in this study, the auxiliary particle “ppun” may come after the verbal ending, substantive, and particle and also be followed by a grammatical case marker and a semantic case marker. When “ppun” comes in the place of the subject or object, it is always accompanied by a grammatical case marker, which is different from other auxiliary particles. Moreover, in many cases, predicates such as “ida” and “anida” come afterward, but sometimes “ppun” is used with a general predicate depending on which particle follows. The meaning revealed by the auxiliary particle “ppun” is a semantic relationship between “focus” combined with “ppun” and “alternative set” as an element that it brings, indicating that the alternative becomes “exclusive” by choosing focus. Therefore, when “ppun” is used with “ida” in an affirmative statement, it indicates that the selected focus is small in number or does not amount to much while simultaneously excluding alternatives. On the other hand, when “ppun” is used with “anida” in a negative statement, the exclusive relationship is negated, thereby affirming both focus and alternatives. Here, the focus of “ppun” is the expectation that this would naturally happen, and the unexpected alternative has the same attribute.
Abstract
This study identifies the meaning and distributive characteristics of the auxiliary particle “ppun” by analyzing corpus examples. Thus far, “ppun” has generally been known to have a limited distribution. However, according to the observation in this study, the auxiliary particle “ppun” may come after the verbal ending, substantive, and particle and also be followed by a grammatical case marker and a semantic case marker. When “ppun” comes in the place of the subject or object, it is always accompanied by a grammatical case marker, which is different from other auxiliary particles. Moreover, in many cases, predicates such as “ida” and “anida” come afterward, but sometimes “ppun” is used with a general predicate depending on which particle follows. The meaning revealed by the auxiliary particle “ppun” is a semantic relationship between “focus” combined with “ppun” and “alternative set” as an element that it brings, indicating that the alternative becomes “exclusive” by choosing focus. Therefore, when “ppun” is used with “ida” in an affirmative statement, it indicates that the selected focus is small in number or does not amount to much while simultaneously excluding alternatives. On the other hand, when “ppun” is used with “anida” in a negative statement, the exclusive relationship is negated, thereby affirming both focus and alternatives. Here, the focus of “ppun” is the expectation that this would naturally happen, and the unexpected alternative has the same attribute.
참고문헌 (19)
- 고영근, "現代國語의 準自立形式에 對한 硏究-形式名詞를 中心으로", 어학연구, 6(1), pp.17~55 (1970), 서울대학교 언어교육원
- 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어문법 2: 용법편" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 김석득, "우리말 형태론: 말본론" (1992), 탑출판사
- 김진형, "조사연속구성과 합성조사에 대하여", 형태론, 2(1), pp.59~72 (2000), 형태론
- 남윤진, "현대국어의 조사에 대한 계량언어학적 연구" (2000), 태학사
- 문병열, "중세 국어 한정 보조사의 의미ㆍ기능과 그 변화 양상", 國語學, (54), pp.137~165 (2009), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박진호, "보조사의 역사적 연구", 國語學, (73), pp.375~435 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1994), 뿌리깊은나무
- 성광수, "國語助辭에 對한 硏究" (1978), 형설출판사
- 여현정, "현대국어 조사에 대한 인지적 접근: 조사의 통합 순서를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2018
- 유경화, "‘단일 한정’ 보조사 ‘만’과 ‘뿐’에 대한 비교 분석", 한중인문학연구, (37), pp.271~295 (2012), 한중인문학회
- 유하라, "현대국어 조사의 배열 양상", 박사, 국어학, pp.2006
- 임동훈, "한국어 조사의 하위 부류와 결합 유형", 國語學, (43), pp.119~154 (2004), 국어학회
- 임동훈, "‘은", 는’과 종횡의 의미 관계, 2012, pp.(64), 217~271[DOI]
- 임동훈, "보조사의 의미론", 國語學, (73), pp.335~373 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 임홍빈, "국어 명사구와 조사구의 통사 구조에 대하여", 관악어문연구, 24, pp.1~62 (1999), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 최현배, "우리말본: 깁고고침" (1955), 정음사
- 홍사만, "국어 특수조사 신연구" (2002), 역락
- 황화상, "국어 조사의 문법" (2012), 지식과 교양
