보조사 ‘(이)나’의 의미론 - ‘이접’의 의미와의 관련성을 중심으로 -
Semantics of focus particle (i)na - focusing on the relationship with the meaning of ‘disjunction’ -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we focused on the relationship between focus particle (i)na and disjunctive particle (i)na and attempted to explain the meanings of focus particle (i)na based on the semantic properties of disjunction. The discussions in this paper are summarized as follows. First, due to the semantic properties of disjunction, disjunctive particle (i)na has three meanings: 'inclusive', 'exclusive'(including 'excluding' and 'excluded'), and 'uncertainty'. All three of these meanings are also found in focus particle (i)na. Second, when the meaning of ‘uncertainty’ appears explicitly in focus particle (i)na, it is mainly related to exclusive disjunctive contexts where the meaning of 'uncertainty' is most pronounced. Third, the meaning of 'exclusive' expressed by focus particle (i)na is divided into two types of 'exclusion' expressed by exclusive disjunction. The 'second best' or 'unsatisfactory choice', which is the representative meaning of focus particle (i)na is the result of the upper value in the scale implication based on irrealis mood being excluded and as a result the lower value being selected as the focus. When focus particle (i)na indicates the meaning of 'excluding', if the upper value becomes the focus, it forms a necessary condition context, whereas if the lower value becomes the focus, it forms a sufficient condition context, just like exclusive focus particle man. However, focus particle (i)na does not have 'exhaustiveness' due to the meaning of 'uncertainty'. Fourth, inclusive focus particle (i)na reveals the meaning of 'large subjective quantity' by including lower values in the scale implication based on realis mood. This aspect also appears in the inclusive focus particle to. Inclusive focus particle (i)na can form an alternative set even when it does not involve 'quantity' or 'degree', in such cases, similar to inclusive focus particle kkaji, it means 'surprise' or 'unexpected event'.
Abstract
In this paper, we focused on the relationship between focus particle (i)na and disjunctive particle (i)na and attempted to explain the meanings of focus particle (i)na based on the semantic properties of disjunction. The discussions in this paper are summarized as follows. First, due to the semantic properties of disjunction, disjunctive particle (i)na has three meanings: 'inclusive', 'exclusive'(including 'excluding' and 'excluded'), and 'uncertainty'. All three of these meanings are also found in focus particle (i)na. Second, when the meaning of ‘uncertainty’ appears explicitly in focus particle (i)na, it is mainly related to exclusive disjunctive contexts where the meaning of 'uncertainty' is most pronounced. Third, the meaning of 'exclusive' expressed by focus particle (i)na is divided into two types of 'exclusion' expressed by exclusive disjunction. The 'second best' or 'unsatisfactory choice', which is the representative meaning of focus particle (i)na is the result of the upper value in the scale implication based on irrealis mood being excluded and as a result the lower value being selected as the focus. When focus particle (i)na indicates the meaning of 'excluding', if the upper value becomes the focus, it forms a necessary condition context, whereas if the lower value becomes the focus, it forms a sufficient condition context, just like exclusive focus particle man. However, focus particle (i)na does not have 'exhaustiveness' due to the meaning of 'uncertainty'. Fourth, inclusive focus particle (i)na reveals the meaning of 'large subjective quantity' by including lower values in the scale implication based on realis mood. This aspect also appears in the inclusive focus particle to. Inclusive focus particle (i)na can form an alternative set even when it does not involve 'quantity' or 'degree', in such cases, similar to inclusive focus particle kkaji, it means 'surprise' or 'unexpected event'.
참고문헌 (30)
- 강아름, "한국어 이접 표지자 ‘이나’와 ‘인가’의 의미 분석", 언어학 연구, 67, pp.103~127 (2023), 한국중원언어학회
- 곽유석, "비망라성을 나타내는 표지의 형식과 의미", 국어학, 107, pp.353~376 (2023), 국어학회
- 김교연, "한국어 통사론의 과제와 도전", pp.663~685 (2021), 집문당
- 김지은, "불대수적 의미론에서의 한국어 명사구의 연접과 이접 연결", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.349~362 (2018), 한국현대언어학회
- 도재학, "동등구문의 개념과 한국어 표현의 다양성-언어유형론적 연구를 위한 비교 개념에 기반하여-", 국어학, 91, pp.149~193 (2019), 국어학회
- 류병률, "한국어 접속조사 “-이나(-(이)나)”", 한국어 의미학, 29, pp.29~56 (2009), 한국어의미학회
- 류병률, "한국어 조사 “이나”의 함축 해석에서 나타나는 척도의 유형에 관하여", 언어연구, 25(3), pp.529~552 (2009), 한국현대언어학회
- 류병률, "한국어 조사 ‘-이나’의 의미와 쓰임", 박사, pp.2013
- 박진호, "보조사의 역사적 연구", 국어학, 73, pp.375~435 (2015), 국어학회
- 양인석, "Semantics of Delimiters", 어학연구, 9(2), pp.84~122 (1973), 서울대학교 언어교육원
- 양해승, "한국어의 주관량(住觀量, Subjective Quantity)표현 연구", 국어학, 71, pp.127~188 (2014), 국어학회
- 윤재학, "연접적 ‘(이)나’", 언어와 정보, 4(2), pp.41~54 (2000), 한국언어정보학회
- 윤평현, "국어의 선택관계 접속 어미에 대한 연구", 한국언어문학, 38, pp.83~105 (1997), 한국언어문학회
- 이희자, "한국어 학습 전문가용 어미‧조사 사전" (2010), 한국문화사
- 임동훈, "한국어 조사의 하위 부류와 결합 유형", 국어학, 48, pp.125~143 (2004), 국어학회
- 임동훈, "한국어 조사 ‘만’과 ‘도’의 의미론", 朝鮮學報, 205, pp.1~20 (2007), 조선학회
- 임동훈, "한국어 병렬문의 문법적 위상", 국어학, 56, pp.87~130 (2009), 국어학회
- 임동훈, "보조사의 의미론", 국어학, 73, pp.335~373 (2015), 국어학회
- 특정성, 총칭성, 복수성, "한국어 명사구의 의미론: 한정성", pp.2013, 전영철
- 전후민, "한국어 보조사 구문 연구", 박사, pp.2021
- 정혜선, "이접의 ‘-든지’에 대한 역사적 연구", 한국어 의미학, 78, pp.362~382 (2022), 한국어의미학회
- 정혜선, "‘-은가’의 연결어미 용법에 대한 역사적 연구", 어문연구, 51(3), pp.5~30 (2023), 한국어문교육연구회
- 주지연, "한국어 병렬 구성 연구", 박사, pp.2015
- 최윤지, "이접과 양태의 상관관계 고찰 : ‘-인가’를 중심으로", 국어학, 60, pp.146~181 (2011), 국어학회
- 함병호, "한국어 양태 보조사 연구", 석사, pp.2011
- 홍사만, "국어 특수조사 신연구" (2002), 역락
- Bhat, D. N. S., "Pronouns" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Lyons, J., "Semantics: 1" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman