본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

읽기 단원과 연계한 통합적 문법 교수·학습의 효과 연구

The Study on Effect of Grammar Teaching Intergrated with a Reading Lesson

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

For the Korean middle school students, the most difficult part of the Korean curriculum is the Korean grammar. This is resulted from the organization of Korean textbook and the Korean text book itself. In other words, the grammar of the Korean textbook is solely composed and it is not coupled with other curriculum like Literature, Reading, Listening and Writing. Because of this textbook curriculum, Korean middle school learners have to learn a grammar intensively only one time for one semester. That is, students have to learn a bit boring grammar for one semester intensively, which is comparatively long time, and not learning often throughout the whole curriculum. Considering all of this, it is quite natural for students to view the grammar lesson as the most difficult part of the Korean curriculum. If the Korean grammar is coupled with other curriculum, allowing students to know better about the usage of Korean grammar in the natural life, the learners will be able to feel the attraction of the Korean grammar. Also, the learners can find the answer of what can be applied on life for themselves. Therefore, this study was conducted based on the hypothesis that if the learner can contact with grammar repeatedly and easily on theirlife, the learner’s motivation and achievement will increase. This study was conducted with divided two groups of all of six classes in the third grade students in Busan A national middle school and taught them a grammar lesson with unit 3 of Gyohaksa six. First group(1,2,3 class the third grade) was conducted as follow. The first section of the 3 sections textbook was a grammar lesson alone and the second section was a grammar lesson integrated with a reading lesson. The second group(4,5,6 class , the third grade) was conducted as follow. The first section of the 3 section textbook was a grammar lesson integrated with a reading lesson and the second section was a grammar lesson alone. There are characteristics of these sections(one and two). The learning contents of the first section are grammatical elements. In this section, students can learn honorific expressions, negative expressions, time expression, passive expressions and active expressions. The learning contents of the second sections are about discourse. In this section, students can learn the concepts of the discourse and how social and cultural variable elements can affect discourse. The result of study shows that the First group has got the higher score on integrated class and the second group has got the higher score on grammar separate class.

Abstract

For the Korean middle school students, the most difficult part of the Korean curriculum is the Korean grammar. This is resulted from the organization of Korean textbook and the Korean text book itself. In other words, the grammar of the Korean textbook is solely composed and it is not coupled with other curriculum like Literature, Reading, Listening and Writing. Because of this textbook curriculum, Korean middle school learners have to learn a grammar intensively only one time for one semester. That is, students have to learn a bit boring grammar for one semester intensively, which is comparatively long time, and not learning often throughout the whole curriculum. Considering all of this, it is quite natural for students to view the grammar lesson as the most difficult part of the Korean curriculum. If the Korean grammar is coupled with other curriculum, allowing students to know better about the usage of Korean grammar in the natural life, the learners will be able to feel the attraction of the Korean grammar. Also, the learners can find the answer of what can be applied on life for themselves. Therefore, this study was conducted based on the hypothesis that if the learner can contact with grammar repeatedly and easily on theirlife, the learner’s motivation and achievement will increase. This study was conducted with divided two groups of all of six classes in the third grade students in Busan A national middle school and taught them a grammar lesson with unit 3 of Gyohaksa six. First group(1,2,3 class the third grade) was conducted as follow. The first section of the 3 sections textbook was a grammar lesson alone and the second section was a grammar lesson integrated with a reading lesson. The second group(4,5,6 class , the third grade) was conducted as follow. The first section of the 3 section textbook was a grammar lesson integrated with a reading lesson and the second section was a grammar lesson alone. There are characteristics of these sections(one and two). The learning contents of the first section are grammatical elements. In this section, students can learn honorific expressions, negative expressions, time expression, passive expressions and active expressions. The learning contents of the second sections are about discourse. In this section, students can learn the concepts of the discourse and how social and cultural variable elements can affect discourse. The result of study shows that the First group has got the higher score on integrated class and the second group has got the higher score on grammar separate class.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 교육과학기술부, "2009 개정 교육과정 총론에 따른 교과 교육과정(국어)", 72~ (2011)
  2. 김규훈, "텍스트 중심 문법교육의 원리", 새국어교육, (85), pp.27~48 (2010), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
  3. 김은성, "학습자들은 왜 문법학습을 꺼리는가?", 국어교육연구, (40), pp.35~72 (2007), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
  4. 남미영, "중학교 국어 ⑥" (2015), (주)교학사
  5. 심영택, "문법 지식의 교수학적 변환 연구- 문법 교육의 학습 환경을 중심으로", 국어교육학연구, (21), pp.355~390 (2004), 국어교육학회
  6. 이관규, "통합적 문법 교육의 의의와 방법", 문법 교육, (11), pp.259~282 (2009), 한국문법교육학회
  7. 이관규, "통합적 국어교육의 가치와 ‘독서와 문법’", 국어교과교육연구, 18, pp.108~ (2011)
  8. 이영주, "통합적 문법 교육의 문제점과 개선 방향", 문법 교육, 7, pp.146~169 (2007), 한국문법교육학회
  9. 이지수, "문법 단원 본문 텍스트의 중층적 구조", 국어교육학연구, 49(2), pp.481~511 (2014), 국어교육학회
  10. 주세형, "통합적 문법 교육 내용 설계의 원리와 실제 연구", 박사, 국어교육, pp.2005
  11. 최지혜, "2009 개정 중학교 『국어』교과서의 문법 영역 실현 양상 연구 : 통합적 문법 교육을 중심으로", 석사, 국어교육전공, pp.2014

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)