한국어 학습자의 구어 발화에 나타난 어휘 발달 양상 분석-중국인 학습자를 중심으로-
Analysis of Chinese Korean Learner Lexical Development in Spoken Korean.
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates lexical complexity in spoken Korean produced by Chinese students learning Korean by measuring lexical density and diversity. This study intends to examine the developmental differences in lexical complexity according to different groups and tasks. 136 Chinese students have been divided into three groups: basic group, intermediate group and advanced group. The results of this study reveal that the lexical diversity of the three groups shows a statistical significance, while the lexical density of the three groups does not show a statistical significance. Lexical diversity is statistically significant among the three groups in all tasks. However, lexical density was statistically significant among the three groups in some tasks. Also, the lexical diversity of the divergent tasks was higher than the convergent tasks. The result of this study would not only provide the validity of measurement tools of lexical complexity in spoken Korean, but also present basic information of measuring learners’ spoken production.
Abstract
This study investigates lexical complexity in spoken Korean produced by Chinese students learning Korean by measuring lexical density and diversity. This study intends to examine the developmental differences in lexical complexity according to different groups and tasks. 136 Chinese students have been divided into three groups: basic group, intermediate group and advanced group. The results of this study reveal that the lexical diversity of the three groups shows a statistical significance, while the lexical density of the three groups does not show a statistical significance. Lexical diversity is statistically significant among the three groups in all tasks. However, lexical density was statistically significant among the three groups in some tasks. Also, the lexical diversity of the divergent tasks was higher than the convergent tasks. The result of this study would not only provide the validity of measurement tools of lexical complexity in spoken Korean, but also present basic information of measuring learners’ spoken production.
참고문헌 (43)
- 강범모, "한국어사용빈도: 1500만 어절 세종형태의미분석말뭉치 기반" (2009), 한국문화사
- 김광해, "국어 어휘론 개설" (1993), 집문당
- 김의수, "이주노동자의 한국어 구어 문장이 지닌 통사적 복잡성과 그 한계", 한국어학, 50, pp.111~140 (2011), 한국어학회
- 남주연, "한국어 학습자의 구어에 나타난 어휘 다양성 측정 -D값을 중심으로-", 한국어 의미학, 45, pp.69~97 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- 남주연, "한국어 학습자의 구어 복잡도 연구: 통사 및 어휘복잡도를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2015
- 류한레이, "중국인 한국어 학습자의 중간 언어 연구: 어휘를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2017
- 박정은, "한국어 고급 학습자의 작문에 나타난 어휘의 다양성", 한국어교육, 25(2), pp.1~32 (2014), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 배도용, "한국어 학습자의 쓰기에 나타난 어휘 다양도 및 어휘 밀도 연구", 언어과학, 19(1), pp.99~117 (2012), 한국언어과학회
- 안경화, "중간언어 어휘론 연구의 과제와 전망", 이중언어학, (23), pp.167~186 (2003), 이중언어학회
- 제3차 한국어 말하기 평가 개발연구, "원미진", 국립국제교육원, ~ (2016)
- 원미진, "한국어 학습자의 쓰기에 나타난 어휘 풍요도 연구-숙달도 측정 도구로써 어휘 풍요도 측정 가능성을 중심으로", 어문론총, (71), pp.33~55 (2017), 한국문학언어학회[DOI]
- 이복자, "한국어 학습자의 쓰기와 말하기에 나타난 복잡도, 정확도, 유창도에 역동성발달 연구", 박사, pp.2015
- 이영근, "한국어 학습자 중위언어 발화의 정확도와 복잡도를 측정하기 위한 분석도구에 관한 소고", 국제한국어교육학회 제15차 국제학술대회 발표자료집, pp.171~175 (2005)
- 이희욱, "웹 기반 협력적 쓰기를 통한 한국어 어휘력 향상 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육전공, pp.2014
- 장미미, "한국어 학습자의 언어 능력에 대한 연구: 말하기 평가 점수와의 관계를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2017
- 주우동, "중국인 한국어 학습자의 언어 발달 양상 연구: 복잡성과 정확성을 중심으로,", 박사, pp.2019
- 주월랑, "여성결혼 이민자의 중간언어발달 연구: 쓰기자료의 복잡성과 정확성을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2018
- 진대연, "한국어 쓰기능력 구성요소로서의 어휘에 대한 연구", 이중언어학, (30), pp.385~418 (2006), 이중언어학회
- 황은경, "Korean EFL college learner’s linguistic features in narrative and argumentative writing in terms of CAF", 박사, pp.2013
- Bulté, B., "Investigating lexical proficiency development over time : the case of Dutch-speaking learners of French in Brussels", Journal of French Language Studies, 3(18), pp.277~298 (2008)
- Covington M. A., "Cutting the Gordian knot: the moving-average type–token Ratio(MATTR)", Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17, pp.94~100 (2010)
- CASPR Research Report 2007–05, "Covington, M. A.", MATTR, ~ (2007)
- Duff, P., "Talking to Learn" (1986), Newbury House
- Ellis, R., "Analysing Learner Language" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Fergadiotis, G., "Measuring Lexical Diversity in Narrative Discourse of People With Aphasia", American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 22(2), pp.S397~S408 (2013)
- Foster, P., "The influence of planning and task type on second language performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, pp.299~324 (1996)
- Gilanlioglu, Ilkay, "The effects of task features on lexis and grammar in L2 oral performance", Doctor, pp.2002
- Guiraud, P., "Les Caracteres Statistiques Du Vocabulaire" (1954), Presses universitaires de France
- Guiraud, P., "Problèmes Et Mèthodes De La Statistique Linguistique" (1960), Reidel
- Jarvis, S., "Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity", Language Testing, 19(1), pp.57~84 (2002)
- Larsen-Freeman, D., "The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English", Applied Linguistics, 27(4), pp.590~619 (2006)
- Malvern, D. D., "Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity", Language Testing, 19(1), pp.85~104 (2002)
- Malvern, D. D., "Evolving models of language", pp.58~71 (1997), Multilingual Matters
- McCarthy PM, "MTLD, voc-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment", Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), pp.381~392 (2010)
- McCarthy, P. M., "A theoretical and empirical evaluation of vocd", Language Testing, 24, pp.459~488 (2007)
- McKee, G., "Measuring vocabulary diversity using dedicated software", Literary & Linguistic Computing, 15, pp.323~337 (2000)
- Owen, A. J., "Lexical diversity in the spontaneous speech of children with specific language impairment: Application of D", Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 45, pp.927~937 (2002)
- Read, J., "Assessing Vocabulary" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Quantifying Lexical Diversity in the Study of Language Development, "Richards, B. J.", The University of Reading, ~ (1997)
- Robinson, P., "Attention, memory, and the ‘noticing’ hypothesis", Language Learning, 45, pp.283~331 (1995)
- Selinker, L., "Interlanguage", Information International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), pp.209~241 (1972)
- Skehan, P., "A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction", Applied Linguistics, 17(1), pp.38~62 (1996)
- Wolfe-Quintero, K., "Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity" (1998), Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa
