번역 학습자의 중·한 번역물 평가 기준에 관한 연구
Research on the Chinese-Korean Translation Quality Evaluation Criteria for Translation Students.
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to develop a Chinese-Korean translation quality evaluation criteria for translation students. The criteria was developed following 3 procedures. First, existing translation quality criteria was reviewed. A new model was built with 3 components-`meaning transfer', `target language norms', `idiomatic expressions'-and 6 sub-elements with 10 items. Second, the model was applied to analyze the students' translation, for checking the adaptation of the items and the omitted or repeated items. Third, based on the data, this study developed a Chinese-Korean translation quality evaluation criteria with 3 components, 5 sub-elements and 9 items: 1 item for unjustified omission or addition, 2 items for distortion, 2 items for accuracy of target language norms, 3 items for appropriacy of idiomatic expressions, and 1 item for appropriacy of text type. This study opens new perspective for evaluation in translation education and provides a criteria for Chinese-Korean translation quality evaluation based on the error analysis.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop a Chinese-Korean translation quality evaluation criteria for translation students. The criteria was developed following 3 procedures. First, existing translation quality criteria was reviewed. A new model was built with 3 components-`meaning transfer', `target language norms', `idiomatic expressions'-and 6 sub-elements with 10 items. Second, the model was applied to analyze the students' translation, for checking the adaptation of the items and the omitted or repeated items. Third, based on the data, this study developed a Chinese-Korean translation quality evaluation criteria with 3 components, 5 sub-elements and 9 items: 1 item for unjustified omission or addition, 2 items for distortion, 2 items for accuracy of target language norms, 3 items for appropriacy of idiomatic expressions, and 1 item for appropriacy of text type. This study opens new perspective for evaluation in translation education and provides a criteria for Chinese-Korean translation quality evaluation based on the error analysis.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강경이, "번역수업에서 번역과제물 감수활동을 통한 다면평가 제안", 번역학연구, 12(4), pp.7~32 (2011), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 곽순례, "한국어-아랍어 번역 교육을 위한 번역 평가 기준에 관한 연구", 아랍어와 아랍문학, 23(3), pp.41~70 (2019), 한국아랍어아랍문학회[DOI]
- 금지아, "중한 번역에서의 글쓰기 전략 연구 －중국인 학습자의 번역 텍스트 분석을 중심으로－", 인문과학연구, (65), pp.7~26 (2020), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
- 김련희, "번역교육현장에서의 번역물 평가에 대한 제언", 人文科學硏究, 13, pp.79~98 (2007), 인문과학연구소
- 김아영, "중-한 번역에서 복문의 번역방법", 중국어문논역총간, 25, pp.201~230 (2009), 중국어문논역학회
- 김진아, "번역 품질평가에 관한 小考", 외국문학연구, (11), pp.4~124 (2002), 외국문학연구소
- 김한식, "한-일 번역 평가 기준에 관한 고찰", 동일어문연구, 22, pp.1~16 (2007), 동일어문학회
- 배만호, "번역 교육: 이론과 실제" (2010), 동인
- 유수경, "중한 번역 오류의 특징 고찰 및 유형 분류 - 신문보도문 분석을 기반으로", 중국어문학지, (61), pp.253~286 (2017), 중국어문학회
- 이향, "번역물 감수의 심층분석을 통한 번역교육 응용방안 연구", 박사, 통역번역학, pp.2006
- 이향, "번역품질평가의 현황과 과제", 번역학연구, 11(2), pp.107~125 (2010), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 장혜선, "전문번역 교육을 위한 품질평가모델 구축에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2014
- 전병만, "(언어 교사를 위한) 평가 이론과 실제" (2012), 케임브리지
- 정철자, "번역 교육과정 개발 평가: 시장 수요 중심으로", 번역학연구, 13(2), pp.265~282 (2012), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 江进林, "学生英译汉分析性评分标准的研制", 外语与外语教学, 6, pp.56~60 (2012)
- 李晓敏, "译文评价标准新探索", 上海科技翻译, 3, pp.17~20 (2003)
- 王金铨, "学习者汉英翻译分析性评分细则的制定", 外语教学, 30(4), pp.96~112 (2009)
- Doyle, M. S., "Translation pedagogy and assessment: Adopting ATA's framework for standard error marking", The ATA Chronicle, 32(11), pp.21~28 (2003)
- House, J., "Translation quality assessment" (1997), G. Narr
- Hurtado Albir, A., "An empirical study on multidimensional summative assessment in translation teaching", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 12(1), pp.25~47 (2018)
- Koby, G. S., "From professional certification to the translator training classroom: Adapting the ATA error marking scale", Translation Watch Quarterly, 1(1), pp.33~45 (2005)
- Rhodes, E. F., "Translation Criticism-The Potentials & Limitations: Categories and Criteria for Translation Quality Assessment" (2000), Routledge
- Samir, A., "Translation quality assessment rubric : A Rasch model-based validation", International Journal of Language Testing, 10(2), pp.101~128 (2020)
- Veiga Diaz, M., "Constructively aligned assessment: An integral approach to translation teaching and learning", Meta, 61(2), pp.276~298 (2016)
- "ITT 소개"[URL]
- "ATA 소개"[URL]