意志表現の疑問文に関する日韓対照研究 -文法形式の対応関係を中心に-
The Contrastive Study of Interrogative Sentence of Volition Expression in Japanese and Korean -Focusing on the Correspondence of Grammatical Forms-
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper compared and contrasted interrogative sentence of the volition expression in Japanese and Korean, focusing on the correspondence of grammatical forms. Analysis results are as follows. ‒Interrogative sentence of volitive in Japanese expresses ‘doubt of volition’, ‘question of intention’, ‘suggestion’. But these usages cannot be demonstrated by the interrogative sentence of volitive in Korean. Instead in korean -ulkey(yo) can refer to these meanings. ‒Interrogative sentence of volitive in Korean expresses ‘question of volition’, ‘rhetorical question of volition’. But these usages cannot be demonstrated by the interrogative sentence of volitive in Japanese. Instead in Japanese suruka/ shimashyooka can refer to these meanings. ‒Interrogative sentence of volitive in Japanese holds the speaker-centered characteristics, whereas interrogative sentence of volitive in Korean bears the hearer-centered characteristics. ‒Interrogative sentence of volitional expression in Japanese and Korean can be expressed in not only plain style but also polite style. But Korean has another style distinction like formal style and in formal style, and the five usages of interrogative sentence of volitional expression in Korean is expressed in partial in formal style or informal style.
Abstract
This paper compared and contrasted interrogative sentence of the volition expression in Japanese and Korean, focusing on the correspondence of grammatical forms. Analysis results are as follows. ‒Interrogative sentence of volitive in Japanese expresses ‘doubt of volition’, ‘question of intention’, ‘suggestion’. But these usages cannot be demonstrated by the interrogative sentence of volitive in Korean. Instead in korean -ulkey(yo) can refer to these meanings. ‒Interrogative sentence of volitive in Korean expresses ‘question of volition’, ‘rhetorical question of volition’. But these usages cannot be demonstrated by the interrogative sentence of volitive in Japanese. Instead in Japanese suruka/ shimashyooka can refer to these meanings. ‒Interrogative sentence of volitive in Japanese holds the speaker-centered characteristics, whereas interrogative sentence of volitive in Korean bears the hearer-centered characteristics. ‒Interrogative sentence of volitional expression in Japanese and Korean can be expressed in not only plain style but also polite style. But Korean has another style distinction like formal style and in formal style, and the five usages of interrogative sentence of volitional expression in Korean is expressed in partial in formal style or informal style.
참고문헌 (22)
- 국립국어원, "한국어교육총서2 외국인을 위한 한국어문법2-용법편", pp.534~541 (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 박재연, "‘-겠-’과 ‘-을 것이-’의 비대립 환경과 대립 환경", 國語學, (85), pp.113~149 (2018), 국어학회[DOI]
- 서정수, "수정증보판 국어문법", pp.225~265 (1996), 한양대학교출판원
- 손혜옥, "한국어 양태 범주 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 이기용, "언어와 추정", 국어학, 6, pp.29~14 (1978), 국어학회
- 이필영, "추정과 비추정의 ‘-겠-’의 의미", 어문연구, 73, pp.109~126 (2012), 어문연구학회[DOI]
- 이희자, "한국어 학습 전문가용 어미·조사 사전", pp.501~502 (2010), 한국문화사
- 임동훈, "7인의 젊은 학자들이 본 한국어 통사론의 현상과이론", pp.225~265 (2011), 태학사
- 임홍빈, "{-겠-}과 대상성", 한글, 170, pp.587~630 (1980), 한글학회
- 정경미, "한국어 추론 증거성 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 한길, "현대 우리말의 반어법 연구", pp.1~257 (2005), 역락
- 한길, "현대 우리말의 형태론", pp.209~391 (2006), 역락
- 安達太郎, "第1章 意志・勧誘のモダリティ」宮崎和人他『新日本語文法選書4 モダリティ", pp.18~41 (2002), くろしお出版
- 西山佑司, "日本語名詞句の意味論と語用論-指示的名詞句と非指示的名詞句-", pp.1~118 (2003), ひつじ書房
- 西山佑司, "談話と文脈", pp.1~54 (2004), 岩波書店
- 仁田義雄, "日本語のモダリティと人称", pp.203~224 (1991), ひつじ書房
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法4第8部モダリティ", pp.51~61 (2003), くろしお出版
- 宮崎和人, "新日本語文法選書4 モダリティ", pp.1~15 (2002), くろしお出版
- 문창학, "文の類型に関する日韓対照研究-形態論的レベルを中心に-", 일본언어문화, (37), pp.137~152 (2016), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- 문창학, "意志表現に関する日韓対照研究 -文法形式と文法化形式を中心に-", 일본언어문화, (41), pp.152~171 (2017), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- 文彰鶴, "日韓語における意志形の疑問化について", 韓国日本言語文化学会2018年度春季国際学術大会発表論文集, pp.49~54 (2018)
- 山岡正紀, "コミュニケーションと配慮表現-日本語語用論入門-" (2010), 明治書院
