본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

現代 日本語 排他的 限定副詞에 관한 考察 -とりたて 觀點에서-

A Study on Exclusive Qualifying Adverbs of Modern Japanese Language -In Terms of TORITATE-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This paper identified “tada, tanni, moppara, hitoeni”, which are categorized as toritate adverbs of the modern Japanese language, as exclusive qualifying adverbs and analyzed 4 forms of toritate grammatical properties. Most of all, 4 forms are syntactically all the same in that they can directly modify a predicate but a noun and cannot modify a predicate with a postposition placed behind. However, the difference is that only“moppara” can be a predicate by accompanying a copula word and “hitoeni” does not show the modification of a noun when “no” is placed in between. In addition, 4 forms are identical in that they are able to coexist with toritate postpositions of “take, bakari, shika, nomi”. It is characteristic that the postpositions commonly precede the Subject in the distribution of a sentence, but they are followed by the Subject when “moppara” is used as a predicate. Meanwhile, semantically “tada, tanni, moppara, hitoeni” all have the characteristics of toritate, 「Contrast between the Subject and the Other」and are the same in that they show the meaning of 「Affirmation of the Subject」 and 「Negation of the Other」. Nevertheless, “moppara” in particular, also has the meaning of 「Affirmation of the Other」under the restriction that “moppara” has a lot of Subjects.

Abstract

This paper identified “tada, tanni, moppara, hitoeni”, which are categorized as toritate adverbs of the modern Japanese language, as exclusive qualifying adverbs and analyzed 4 forms of toritate grammatical properties. Most of all, 4 forms are syntactically all the same in that they can directly modify a predicate but a noun and cannot modify a predicate with a postposition placed behind. However, the difference is that only“moppara” can be a predicate by accompanying a copula word and “hitoeni” does not show the modification of a noun when “no” is placed in between. In addition, 4 forms are identical in that they are able to coexist with toritate postpositions of “take, bakari, shika, nomi”. It is characteristic that the postpositions commonly precede the Subject in the distribution of a sentence, but they are followed by the Subject when “moppara” is used as a predicate. Meanwhile, semantically “tada, tanni, moppara, hitoeni” all have the characteristics of toritate, 「Contrast between the Subject and the Other」and are the same in that they show the meaning of 「Affirmation of the Subject」 and 「Negation of the Other」. Nevertheless, “moppara” in particular, also has the meaning of 「Affirmation of the Other」under the restriction that “moppara” has a lot of Subjects. This meaning is not shown in “tada, tanni, hitoeni”; in this regard, there is a difference in 4 forms. Also, “tanni, hitoeni”are identical in that they are related to the subjective assessment of the narrator, but different in that the former focuses on the contrast of the Subject and the Other, while the latter only focuses on the Subject. Furthermore, this paper revealed that “moppara” and “hitoeni” are similar in that their focus is on the Subject, but different in that “hitoeni” has no restriction on the number of Subjects.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 安部朋世, "単ニとタダ", 千葉大学教育学部研究紀要, 52, pp.155~160 (2004), 千葉大学教育学部
  2. 安部朋世, "副詞モッパラの意味分析", 千葉大学教育学部研究紀要, 55, pp.227~231 (2007), 千葉大学教育学部
  3. 市川孝, "岩波講座 日本語6文法Ⅰ", pp.219~258 (1976), 岩波書店
  4. 工藤浩, "國語學と國語史", pp.969~986 (1977), 明治書院
  5. 工藤浩, "叙法副詞の意味と機能", 國立國語硏究所報告71 硏究報告集, 3, pp.45~92 (1982), 國立國語硏究所
  6. 工藤浩, "日本語の文法3 モダリティ", pp.227~231 (2000), 岩波書店
  7. 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅲ", pp.3~9 (1991), くろしお出版
  8. 仁田義雄, "日本語類義表現の文法(上)単文編", pp.37~ (1995), くろしお出版
  9. 日本語記述文法硏究會, "現代日本語文法5 第9部とりたて", pp.15~18 (2009), くろしお出版
  10. 沼田善子, "いわゆる日本語助詞の研究", pp.105~225 (1986), 凡人社
  11. 畠郁, "副詞の意味と用法", pp.3~46 (1990), 国立国語研究所
  12. 飛田良文, "現代副詞用法辞典", pp.264~267 (1994), 東京堂出版

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)