とりたて詞「ばかり」についての一考察 ― 韓国語「만」との対照を中心に―
A study on Japanese Toritate Particle, “Bakari(ばかり)”, in Comparison to Korean Focus Particle, “Man(만).”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Japanese as a second language, the correct usage of the toritate particles is ambiguous, and the errors are often reported. In this aspect, this paper examines the selective interpretation of the toritate particle “bakari,” when “bakari” suffixes to noun phrases. This was incorporated both in terms of semantics and forms. This paper also aims to explain the similarities and differences between "bakari" and "man," which is a Korean counterpart of "bakari." The analysis is centered on three main interpretations of "bakari;"the 'existence,' 'repetition,' and 'simultaneity.' In particular, for the 'existence' and 'repetition' structures, this paper studies thㄷ multiple interpretation of "bakari" both in spatial and time perspectives. As a result, this paper finds that Japanese toritate particle "bakari" is not formed when there are multiple demonstrative elements. On the contrary, Korean "man" is strongly tided to the suffixed phrases, and is hardly interpreted as to have multiple demonstrative elements. This difference asserts that a speaker should understand the dissimilarities between the mother tongue and the Japanese as a second language well, in order to prevent any potential errors.
Abstract
In Japanese as a second language, the correct usage of the toritate particles is ambiguous, and the errors are often reported. In this aspect, this paper examines the selective interpretation of the toritate particle “bakari,” when “bakari” suffixes to noun phrases. This was incorporated both in terms of semantics and forms. This paper also aims to explain the similarities and differences between "bakari" and "man," which is a Korean counterpart of "bakari." The analysis is centered on three main interpretations of "bakari;"the 'existence,' 'repetition,' and 'simultaneity.' In particular, for the 'existence' and 'repetition' structures, this paper studies thㄷ multiple interpretation of "bakari" both in spatial and time perspectives. As a result, this paper finds that Japanese toritate particle "bakari" is not formed when there are multiple demonstrative elements. On the contrary, Korean "man" is strongly tided to the suffixed phrases, and is hardly interpreted as to have multiple demonstrative elements. This difference asserts that a speaker should understand the dissimilarities between the mother tongue and the Japanese as a second language well, in order to prevent any potential errors.
참고문헌 (41)
- 井田泉, "日本語の「だけ·ばかり」の意味と用法に關する考察 : 韓國語の 「만·뿐」との對照を中心に", 석사, 일어일문학, pp.2002
- 市川保子, "日本語誤用辞典", pp.321~326 (2010), スリーエネットワーク
- 奥津敬一郎, "とりたて詞の分布と意味-『でだけ』と『だけで』-", 国文目白, 52, pp.24~ (1986)
- 菊地康人, "バカリ・ダケ, In 意味分析", 東京大学文学部言語学研究室, 57~59 (1983)
- 北原保雄, "日本語の世界6 日本語の文法", pp.263~267 (1981), 中央公論社
- 北原保雄, "日本語文法の焦点", pp.80~ (1984), 教育出版
- 茂木俊伸, "｢ばかり｣文の解釈をめぐって", 日本語文法, 2(1), pp.171~189 (2002)
- 茂木俊伸, "名詞句内のとりたて詞『ばかり』について", 日本語と日本文学, 36, pp.68~79 (2003), 筑波大学国語国文学会
- 佐冶圭三, "『日本語概説』おうふう第5章", pp.57~59 (1989)
- 定延利之, "探索と現代日本語の｢だけ｣｢しか｣｢ばかり｣", 日本語文法, 1(1), pp.111~136 (2001), 日本語文法学会
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅰ", pp.58~59 (1982), くろしお出版
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅲ", pp.13~179 (1991), くろしお出版
- 沼田善子, "とりたて詞, In いわゆる日本語助詞の研究", pp.107~225 (1986), 凡人社
- 沼田善子, "とりたて詞とムード, In 日本語のモダリテイ", pp.159~191 (1989), くろしお出版
- 沼田善子, "日本語文法セルフマスターシリーズ5｢モ｣｢ダケ｣｢サエ｣などーとりたて", pp.40~ (1992), くろしお出版
- 沼田善子, "とりたて詞と視点", 日本語学, 11(8), pp.35~43 (1992), 明治書院
- 沼田善子, "(第3章)とりたて, In 日本語の文法 2時・否定・取り立て", pp.153~216 (2000), くろしお出版
- 沼田善子, "現代日本語ととりたて詞の研究", pp.112~133 (2009), ひつじ書房
- 半藤英明, "『限定』と『取り立て』の視座", 国語国文, 67(3), pp.57~59 (1998)
- 南不二男, "術語文の構造", 国文法講座, 6, pp.6~ (1987), 明示書院
- 森田良行, "動詞の意味論的文法研究", pp.375~404 (1994), 明治書院
- 森田良行, "助詞・助動詞の辞典", pp.216~ (2007), 東京堂出版
- 益岡隆志, "基礎日本語文法", pp.135~ (1989), くろしお出版
- 山口明穂, "日本語文法大辞典", pp.374~376 (2001), 明治書院
- 김말숙, "日·韓 兩言語 「だけ」 「ばかり」와 「만」 「뿐」에 관한 對照 연구", 석사, 일어일문학, pp.2000
- 金승권, "韓国語助詞의 語源研究(Ⅱ)", 建大学術誌, 26, pp.25~32 (1982), 建国大学校
- 金현석, "特殊助詞의 意味 分析", 석사, pp.2006
- 서정수, "現代国語特殊助詞研究", 석사, pp.1994
- 송보경, "국어 특수조사에 대한 연구", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2001
- 李遠吉, "日・韓両国語『だけ』『ばかり』『만』『뿐』에 관한 対照研究", 日本学報, 45, pp.227~242 (2000)
- 임동훈, "韓国語 助詞의 下位 部類와 結合 類型", 国語学, 43, pp.119~154 (2004)
- 채완, "現代国語 特殊助詞의 研究", 国語研究, pp.30~33 (1977), 国語研究会
- 채완, "特殊助詞, In 文法研究と資料", pp.115~138 (1998), 태학사
- 최기용, "韓国語 特殊助詞 構成의 構造", 言語, 21(1), pp.611~650 (1996)
- 최우혁, "現代国語特殊助詞研究", 석사, pp.2002
- 최재웅, "『만』의 作用域 중의성", 言語, 21(1), pp.673~692 (1996)
- 최재웅, "韓国語特殊助詞『만』:形式意味論的分析", 韓国語意味学, 3, pp.41~65 (1998), 韓国語意味学会
- 최현배, "우리말본", pp.639~640 (1937), 정음사
- 洪思滿, "国語特殊助詞論", pp.15~30 (1983), 学文社
- 洪思滿, "韓・日語対照分析", pp.285~326 (2002), 亦楽
- 洪思滿, "国語特殊助詞新研究", pp.235~265 (2002), 亦楽