탈근대의 윤리적 주체화와 책임의 새로운 지평: 들뢰즈와 버틀러의 윤리적 주체화

Abstract

Deleuze's strategy of subjectivation is the process of trying to become other, producing an agency who performs the subject function. Agency do not have an intrinsic identity, but they have a posteriori identity through collective actions. This Deleuze's subjectivity intersects with Butler's main account of ethical subject in Giving an Account of Oneself. Butler works in the structure of talking with relation to the other with subjectivation and identifies oneself as a process of self – production through explaining oneself. In the structure of this subjectivation, I can not explain all of me, and I ask the other, the recipient of speech. Butler explains that the source of accountability comes from my limitations and the otherness within me. Responsibility is not an act that comes from the will of any active subject, but an act that accepts the heterogeneity within me from the structure of subjectivity and assumes the situation that arises from the vulnerability and passivity of human condition. Accordingly, vulnerability reminds us that we are not a thoroughly separated entity with firm boundaries, but a desire for mercy for each other. The subjectivism of postmodernism that deviates from anthropocentrism is not a perfect knowledge of oneself but is beyond the limits of recognizing and understanding the context of its limitations and its constitutional conditions. While accepting the otherness and heterogeneity as the internal structure of subjectivity, the postmodern subject, passing through the ethical turn, approves the connection with the community and forms the ethical subject which seeks a new ethical rule. Key words: Accountability, Passivity, Responsibility, S