EU security: focus on the relationship with NATO
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Europe is attempting to integrate into the political field, which is the most difficult in terms of cooperation. Especially, the efforts of security integration have also continued from the past. Given the fact that the beginning of the European Union, along with economic integration, is almost 70 years ago, the history of political integration and security integration is not very effective. Nevertheless, the degree of security integration can be seen as fast. Recently, there are voices in the EU saying that it should build its own security as well because Donald Trump, the President of the United States, recently remarked that European countries are getting a free ride from NATO and NATO member states should pay more NATO defense costs. Moreover, in 2017, President Donald Trump did not mention the obligation to comply with Article 5 of the collective defense provisions of the NATO Constitution. Meanwhile, with the recent issue of Britain's withdrawal from the EU, Brexit, the security issues of Europe are also becoming more important. Britain plays a major role in European security, so their leaving is a problem. The point is now how the withdrawal of Britain, which is typical Atlanticism, will affect Europe's own independent security identity. In addition, Most of the CEECs were former Soviet Union satellite countries and were guaranteed security through NATO after the collapse of the socialist system. For this reason, most of the CEECs still regard NATO as important for their own security. EU security will continue to cooperate with NATO as it has in the past. However, with these recent issues, the transition to a Westphalia system in the U.S., Brexit, and the Atlanticism of the CEECs, there is the possibility that EU security will transition to Europeanism. It is also important to cooperate with the 3rd party countries for establishing Europe's own security. This can have a positive impact on the relationship between the EU and NATO.
Abstract
Europe is attempting to integrate into the political field, which is the most difficult in terms of cooperation. Especially, the efforts of security integration have also continued from the past. Given the fact that the beginning of the European Union, along with economic integration, is almost 70 years ago, the history of political integration and security integration is not very effective. Nevertheless, the degree of security integration can be seen as fast. Recently, there are voices in the EU saying that it should build its own security as well because Donald Trump, the President of the United States, recently remarked that European countries are getting a free ride from NATO and NATO member states should pay more NATO defense costs. Moreover, in 2017, President Donald Trump did not mention the obligation to comply with Article 5 of the collective defense provisions of the NATO Constitution. Meanwhile, with the recent issue of Britain's withdrawal from the EU, Brexit, the security issues of Europe are also becoming more important. Britain plays a major role in European security, so their leaving is a problem. The point is now how the withdrawal of Britain, which is typical Atlanticism, will affect Europe's own independent security identity. In addition, Most of the CEECs were former Soviet Union satellite countries and were guaranteed security through NATO after the collapse of the socialist system. For this reason, most of the CEECs still regard NATO as important for their own security. EU security will continue to cooperate with NATO as it has in the past. However, with these recent issues, the transition to a Westphalia system in the U.S., Brexit, and the Atlanticism of the CEECs, there is the possibility that EU security will transition to Europeanism. It is also important to cooperate with the 3rd party countries for establishing Europe's own security. This can have a positive impact on the relationship between the EU and NATO.
참고문헌 (39)
- 김신규, "1989년 이후 체코 외교정책의 접근 방향: 대서양주의와 유럽주의", 국제지역연구, 14(3), pp.81~98 (2010), 국제지역연구센터
- 박정원, "탈냉전과 나토(NATO)의 성격변화: 동맹과 집단안보의 이중성", 社會科學敎育硏究, (10), pp.67~ (2009)
- 이수형, "북대서양조약기구(NATO)와 유럽안보" (2004), 한울아카데미
- 이수형, "유럽연합의 안보정책과 동맹 딜레마", 국제관계연구, 16(2), pp.75~102 (2011), 일민국제관계연구원
- 유럽의 국방정책(La défense en Europe: avancées et limites), "Patrice Buffotot", 국방대학교 안보문제연구소, ~ (2006)
- 중앙일보, "트럼프 “나토헌장 5조 준수” 발언 거부...유럽안보동맹 흔들", ~ (2017)
- Aydin-Düzgit, Senem, "PESCO and Third Countries: Breaking the Deadlock in European security", feuture, (3), pp.1~4 (2018)
- Balla, Evanthia, "European Security Strategy in the 21st Century: the Blair Doctrine Revisited", Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), pp.399~412 (2017)
- Boyle, Peter G., "The Origins of NATO" (1990), University of Exter Press
- Brown, Seyom, "The Faces of Power : United States Foreign Policy from Truman to Clinton" (1994), Columbia University Press
- Bull, Hedley, "European Self-Reliance And the Reform of NATO", Foreign Affairs, 61(4), pp.874~892 (1983)
- Buteux, Paul, "The politics of Nuclear Consultation in NATO. 1965-1980" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Cornish, Paul, "Partnership in Crisis : The US, Europe and the Fall and Rise of NATO" (1997), The Royal Institute of International Affairs
- Deighton, Anne, "The New Transatlantic Agenda: Facing the Challenges of Global Governance" (2001), Ashgate Publishing Company
- Hahn, Walter F., "West Germany’s Ostpolitik: The Grand Design of Egon Bahr", Orbis, 16(4), pp.859~880 (1973)
- Kupchan, Charles A., "After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity", International Security, 23(2), pp.40~79 (1998)
- Larrabee, F. Stephen, "East European Security After the Cold War" (1993), Rand
- Reichard, Martin A, "The EU-NATO Relationship : A legal and Political Perspective" (2006), Ashgatie Publishing, Ltd
- Robert, Hunter E., "The European Security and Defense Policy: NATO's Competition or Competitor?" (2002), RAND Corporation
- Keohane, Robert, "International Institutions and State Power : Essays in International Relations Theory" (1989), Westview Press
- Stafford, Roy W., "National Security Policy: The Decision-Making Process" (1984), Archon Books
- EEAS, "EU deepens Defence cooperation, with 25 countries agreeing to prepare 17 projects for Permanent Structured Cooperation", ~ (2017)
- EEAS, "Implementing the Global Strategy: EU delivers on security and defence", ~ (2018)
- EEAS, "Towards a stronger EU on security and defence", ~ (2018)
- "Expert survey result. the Centre for Global Studies", 1~2 (2017)
- "Bezpečnostní strategie České republiky", ~ (2015)
- DNES, "Clinton Mluvil s Klausem o přijetí Prahy do NATO", Května 05, ~ (1995)
- DNES, "Praha tento rok čeká nabídku z NATO", Ledna 02, ~ (1997)
- DNES, "Jak vidíme alianci : Ať nás hájí", Března 20, ~ (1997)
- DNES, "NATO přinese stabilitu, ale i nároky na všechny", Června 14, ~ (1997)
- DNES, "NATO otevřelo brány České republice", Července 09, ~ (1997)
- DNES, "V alianci budeme muset myslet na okolní svět", Července 09, ~ (1997)
- "12/8/98 Albright Statement to the North Atlantic Council"[URL]
- EU observer, "Czech president talks down new EU Foreign policy", ~ (2003)
- Foreign Policy, "Could There Be a Peace of Trumphalia?", ~ (2016)
- Final Communiqué of the Ministerial Meeting of the North Atlantic Council, "NATO", NATO Press, ~, pp.Final Communiqué M-NAC-1(96)63 (1996)
- Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Defense Minister’s Session, "NATO", NATO Press, ~, pp.Final Communiqué M-NAC(DM)-2(96)89 (1996)
- "NATO Treaty", ~
- SpaceWar, "Belgium stands firm over EU military HQ plans", ~ (2003)