서사시에 나타난 ‘민족’ 형상화에 관한 비교 연구 - 고은의 『백두산』과 리욱의 『고향 사람들』, 『풍운기』를 중심으로
A comparative study on configuration of the nation in epics
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study focused on difference of the nation's concept between Ko un's Baekdusan and Lee uk's Gohyangsaramdul, Pungungi. These works are epics restructure nation's history. A epic's story provides framework of recognition to social members. An individual and community accept their story and then stories construct pesonal identity and community's identity. So we can say a epic configurates national identity by story nation history and nation territory. The nation's concept is understood steadfast and very pure as like a blood relationship in Korea. This is aspects of Korean nationalism. But the Nation is modern, social and historical concept. That is different from ethnic identity. This way throws open the door to analyze nation identity. Ko un's Baekdusan narrates permanence and sacralization of the nation for emphasizing the unification of North Korea and South Korea. Baekdusan expresses the social desire of Korea in the 1980s. In comparison, Lee uk's Gohyangsaramdul representate ambivalent attitude. One is a position as a settler and the other is a new master of Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture. So Gohyangsaramdul narrates and remembers their motherland Chosun. But Pungungi exclude recognition of Chosun as motherland. This work's narration focuses on association with struggle of classes and anti-Japanese Movement during the Japanese colonial period. Because these events are able to unity Korean and Chines. Three works deal with same history and same background, but those show defferent recognition about the Nation. Because each society has different social desire and expect different future. The present desire and future prospect construct nation identity.
Abstract
This study focused on difference of the nation's concept between Ko un's Baekdusan and Lee uk's Gohyangsaramdul, Pungungi. These works are epics restructure nation's history. A epic's story provides framework of recognition to social members. An individual and community accept their story and then stories construct pesonal identity and community's identity. So we can say a epic configurates national identity by story nation history and nation territory. The nation's concept is understood steadfast and very pure as like a blood relationship in Korea. This is aspects of Korean nationalism. But the Nation is modern, social and historical concept. That is different from ethnic identity. This way throws open the door to analyze nation identity. Ko un's Baekdusan narrates permanence and sacralization of the nation for emphasizing the unification of North Korea and South Korea. Baekdusan expresses the social desire of Korea in the 1980s. In comparison, Lee uk's Gohyangsaramdul representate ambivalent attitude. One is a position as a settler and the other is a new master of Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture. So Gohyangsaramdul narrates and remembers their motherland Chosun. But Pungungi exclude recognition of Chosun as motherland. This work's narration focuses on association with struggle of classes and anti-Japanese Movement during the Japanese colonial period. Because these events are able to unity Korean and Chines. Three works deal with same history and same background, but those show defferent recognition about the Nation. Because each society has different social desire and expect different future. The present desire and future prospect construct nation identity.
참고문헌 (23)
- 고 은, "백두산 1권-2권" (1987), 창작과비평사
- 고 은, "백두산 3권-4권" (1991), 창작과비평사
- 고 은, "백두산 5권-7권" (1994), 창작과비평사
- 20세기 중국조선족문학사료전집 편집위원회, "20세기 중국조선족 문학사료전집-제2집 리욱 문학편" (2002), 연변인민출판사
- 구인모, "국토순례와 민족의 자기구성", 한국문학연구, 27 (2004)
- 권보드래, "근대 초기 '민족' 개념의 변화-1905~1910년 대한매일신보를 중심으로", 민족문학사연구, (33), pp.189~213 (2007), 민족문학사학회
- 김은영, "중국 조선족 장편서사시에 나타난 역사적 체험의 특성", 한중인문학연구, (19), pp.213~236 (2006), 한중인문학회
- 김재홍, "‘백두산’과 ‘만인보’, 그리고 고은의 문학사상, In 고은문학의 세계" (1993), 창작과 비평사
- 신형기, "민족 이야기를 넘어서" (2003), 삼인
- 윤영실, "문학적 글쓰기와 민족의 공간 -조국(祖國), 신화세계, 변경(邊境)-", 한국현대문학연구, (26), pp.99~125 (2008), 한국현대문학회
- 연변대학교 조선문학연구소, "김조규 · 윤동주 · 리욱" (2006), 보고사
- 임지현, "민족주의는 반역이다" (1999), 소나무
- 윤여탁, "한국 문학사에서 중국 조선족 시문학의 의미", 선청어문, 35 (2007), 서울대학교
- 장은영, "고은의 ≪백두산≫에 나타난 망각과 기억의 서사", 현대문학의 연구, (42), pp.609~639 (2010), 한국문학연구학회
- 전진성, "역사의 기억: "기억의 터"에 대한 최근 독일에서의 논의", 서양사론, (72), pp.167~185 (2002), 한국서양사학회
- 정덕준, "중국조선족 문학의 어제와 오늘" (2006), 푸른사상
- 최호근, "집단기억과 역사", 역사교육, (85) (2003), 역사교육연구회
- ASSMANN, Aleida, "기억의 공간" (2003), 경북대학교출판부
- BALIBAR, Etienne, "민족형태:그 역사와 이데올로기", 이론, 통권 : 6 (1993)
- HALBWACHS, Maurice, "The Collective Memory, with an introduction by Mary Douglas" (1950), Harper-Colophone Books
- RENAN, Ernest, "민족이란 무엇인가" (2002), 책세상
- RICOEUR, Paul, "시간과 이야기Ⅲ" (2004), 문학과지성사
- 정선태, "지도의 상상력" (2006), 산처럼
