미제와 승냥이 - ‘조국해방전쟁’기의 반미관에 대한 연구
American imperialism and Korean wolf - A Study on the Anti-American Viewpoint in the Period of ‘the Homeland Liberation War’
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The negative symbol of ‘American imperialism’, which was reinterpreted superimposed on the symbol imposed on Japanese imperialism in the 1945Liberation of Korea, was more amplified added by the experiences of the bombing and massacre by US troops during the Korean War. In other words,the symbol of the extreme ‘American imperialism’ in the liberation in which even the role of America contributing to the liberation of Josun had been denied had continued for a long time adhered to and amplified through the war. Thus,unlike the current emphasis laid by North Josun, the assertion in the form of ‘American imperialism=Korean wolf’ is an idea made from the mixture of fact and fiction combined with the theory of imperialism rediscovered in the liberation and the experience of massacre during the Korean War. And this superimposed symbol for American imperialism naturally causes the problem of being superimposed also on the symbol of North Josun. And the extreme formalization for ‘good’ and ‘bad’ sides was based on the dichotomous compositions of beauty and ugliness, good and evil. The ground for saying that an act by a good side is ‘unconditionally’ legitimate is nowhere found. The anti-American viewpoint rediscovered in such an extreme form results in one aspect of criticism and resemblance as a result of being locked up in the same violence which one has rejected by oneself. The anti-American viewpoint going on in the form of anti-imperialist nationalism leaves nothing except another terrible retaliation for terrible brutality. It is self-evident that one can never get out of the enchanting power of imperialism which North Josun has continuously criticized in a ring of violence and vengeance, the familiar grammar commanded by North Josun literature.
Abstract
The negative symbol of ‘American imperialism’, which was reinterpreted superimposed on the symbol imposed on Japanese imperialism in the 1945Liberation of Korea, was more amplified added by the experiences of the bombing and massacre by US troops during the Korean War. In other words,the symbol of the extreme ‘American imperialism’ in the liberation in which even the role of America contributing to the liberation of Josun had been denied had continued for a long time adhered to and amplified through the war. Thus,unlike the current emphasis laid by North Josun, the assertion in the form of ‘American imperialism=Korean wolf’ is an idea made from the mixture of fact and fiction combined with the theory of imperialism rediscovered in the liberation and the experience of massacre during the Korean War. And this superimposed symbol for American imperialism naturally causes the problem of being superimposed also on the symbol of North Josun. And the extreme formalization for ‘good’ and ‘bad’ sides was based on the dichotomous compositions of beauty and ugliness, good and evil. The ground for saying that an act by a good side is ‘unconditionally’ legitimate is nowhere found. The anti-American viewpoint rediscovered in such an extreme form results in one aspect of criticism and resemblance as a result of being locked up in the same violence which one has rejected by oneself. The anti-American viewpoint going on in the form of anti-imperialist nationalism leaves nothing except another terrible retaliation for terrible brutality. It is self-evident that one can never get out of the enchanting power of imperialism which North Josun has continuously criticized in a ring of violence and vengeance, the familiar grammar commanded by North Josun literature.
참고문헌 (45)
- "미제와 리승만도당들의 죄악에 대하여(조국전선조사위원회보도)" (1951), 조선로동당출판사
- "조선에서의 미국침략자들의 만행에 관한 문헌집" (1954), 조선로동당출판사
- "조선인민은 도살자 미제와 리승만 역도들의 야수적만행에 복쑤하리라" (1950), 조선인민군 전선사령부 문화훈련국
- 강정구, "미국과 한국전쟁", 역사비평, 21(여름) (1993)
- 기광서, "한국전 개입에 나타난 스탈린의 역할 실상", 군사, (63), pp.87~112 (2007), 국방부군사편찬연구소
- 기광서, "한국전쟁기 소련의 유엔 안보리 불출석과‘드러나지 않은’ 개입", 중소연구, 34(3), pp.139~162 (2010), 아태지역연구센터
- 김동춘, "전쟁과 사회" (2006), 돌베개
- 김영수, "북한의 대미 인식", 현대북한연구, 6(2) (2003)
- 김윤식, "북한문학의 세가지 직접성 - 한설야의 ｢혈로｣ ｢모자｣ ｢승냥이｣ 분석", 예술과 비평, 21(가을) (1990)
- 김일성, "전체 조선인민들에게 호소한 조선민주주의 인민공화국 내각수상 김일성장군의 방송연설", 인민, 5(7) (1950)
- 金日成, "全體作家藝術家들에게주신金日成將軍의激勵의말씀", 문학예술, 4(3) (1951)
- 김일성, "김일성선집(3)" (1953), 조선로동당출판사
- 김일성, "김일성장군의 격려의 말씀" (1951), 문화선전성
- 김일성, "김일성저작집(6)" (1980), 조선로동당출판사
- 김재웅, "북한의 논리를 통해 재구성된 미국의 상(1945∼1950)", 韓國史學報, (37), pp.299~344 (2009), 고려사학회
- 김종회, "북한문학에 나타난 6？25동란", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), 30(49), pp.267~284 (2006), 한민족어문학회
- 김주환, "미국의 세계전략과 한국전쟁" (1989), 청사
- 김진계, "조국(상)" (1990), 현장문학사
- 김춘선, "염상섭의 <취우>와 한설야의 <대동강>비교", 현대문학의 연구, (38), pp.305~325 (2009), 한국문학연구학회
- 남원진, "미국의 두 표상 - 해방기 북조선 문학의 미국에 대한 인식 연구 -", 한국문예비평연구, (36), pp.423~448 (2011), 한국현대문예비평학회
- 남원진, "이야기의 힘과 근대 미달의 양식" (2011), 도서출판 경진
- 리북명, "조선의 딸(1~3)", pp.5~10 (1952), 문학예술
- 리원조, "영웅 형상화의 문제에 대하여", 인민 (1952)
- 박산운, "침교천 언덕에서", 조선문학, 141 (1959)
- 박팔양, "황해의 노래" (1958), 조선작가동맹출판사
- 신영덕, "전쟁과 문학 - 한국전쟁기 남북한 소설에 나타난 외국인과 여성", 전쟁과문학, 2(여름) (2007)
- 신영덕, "한국전쟁기 남북한 소설과 미군·중국군의 형상화 양상", 한중인문학연구, (10), pp.1~26 (2003), 한중인문학회
- 신영덕, "한국전쟁기 남북한 전쟁소설의 특성-한국군과 북한군의 형상화 양상을 중심으로", 한국현대문학연구, (14), pp.75~110 (2003), 한국현대문학회
- 신형기, "북한문학사" (2000), 평민사
- 李北鳴, "惡魔", 문학예술, 4(1) (1951)
- 이신철, "6·25 남북전쟁시기 이북지역에서의 민간인 학살", 역사와 현실, (54), pp.131~170 (2004), 한국역사연구회
- 이주철, "북한의 정부 수립과 열강에 대한 인식 —『정로』ㆍ『로동신문』ㆍ『근로자』를 중심으로—", 史叢, (67), pp.27~52 (2008), 역사학연구회
- 임순득, "趙玉嬉", 문학예술, 4(3) (1951)
- 조선민주주의 인민공화국 과학원 언어문학연구소 문학연구실, "조선문학통사(하)" (1959), 과학원출판사
- 조선민주주의인민공화국 사회과학원 력사연구소, "력사사전(2)" (1973), 사회과학출판사
- 한설야, "｢승냥이｣를 쓰기까지", 청년생활 (1951)
- 한설야, "력사(3)", 문학예술, 6(6) (1953)
- 한설야, "룡악산(1~2)", 조선문학, 11 (1954)
- 한설야, "승냥이", 문학예술, 4(1) (1951)
- 한설야, "전국 작가 예술가 대회에서 진술한 한설야 위원장의 보고", 조선문학, 1 (1953)
- 한설야, "해방탑", 조선문학, 1(3) (1953)
- 한설야, "대동강" (1952), 재일본조선인교육자동맹문학부
- 브루스 커밍스, "한국전쟁의 전개과정" (1989), 태암
- HALLIDAY, J., "Korea : the unknown war" (1988), Pantheon Press
- 와다 하루키(和田春樹), "북조선" (2002), 돌베개