본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

러시아어와 폴란드어 문학텍스트 내 생략의 화용적 분석- 므로제크의 “남쪽으로의 도주”를 중심으로 -

A Pragmatic Approach to Ellipsis in Russian and Polish Colloquial and Informal Texts of the Novel “Exit to the South”

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

The paper pragmatically analyzes ellipsis in Russian and Polish colloquial and informal texts. The famous Polish writer Sławomir Mrożek's "Exit to the South",written in Polish and Russian is used as a material for the analysis. Russian and Polish ellipsis in colloquial and informal texts have in common that the givenness and subjecthood of the elliptical co-referent play a crucial role. However, the ellipsis in two languages also has differences in many ways. Above all, in the Polish texts of colloquial and informal style, a theme is likely to be elliptical and the coreferential relation reaches to an extra-sentential antecedent, while the ellipsis in analysed Russian texts in most cases requires coordinate, subordinate or relative clauses, and the elliptical co-referent tends to have an intra-sentential antecedent. The ellipsis of the theme-subject is unmarked in Polish, where every verbal form has an ending denoting person. Unlike formal style which often allows explicit noun subject, Polish text of colloquial and informal style prefer null form of the subject in most cases. If Polish sentences have explicit theme-subjects,they disambiguate intervening and main themes, and indicate the contrast, the focus, the introduction of new narratives or the change of speaker's point of view. Sometimes direct speeches and deictic pronouns also need explicit theme-subjects in Polish sentences. On the other hand, the ellipsis of the theme-subject is marked in Russian even in colloquial and informal texts. The theme-subject can be deleted in Russian colloquial and informal texts, if the subject is a form of the first or the second person, or if the aspect and the tense of the antecedent sentence's verb are the same as those of the given sentence's verb and both the antecedent and the coreferential word have the nominative case.

Abstract

The paper pragmatically analyzes ellipsis in Russian and Polish colloquial and informal texts. The famous Polish writer Sławomir Mrożek's "Exit to the South",written in Polish and Russian is used as a material for the analysis. Russian and Polish ellipsis in colloquial and informal texts have in common that the givenness and subjecthood of the elliptical co-referent play a crucial role. However, the ellipsis in two languages also has differences in many ways. Above all, in the Polish texts of colloquial and informal style, a theme is likely to be elliptical and the coreferential relation reaches to an extra-sentential antecedent, while the ellipsis in analysed Russian texts in most cases requires coordinate, subordinate or relative clauses, and the elliptical co-referent tends to have an intra-sentential antecedent. The ellipsis of the theme-subject is unmarked in Polish, where every verbal form has an ending denoting person. Unlike formal style which often allows explicit noun subject, Polish text of colloquial and informal style prefer null form of the subject in most cases. If Polish sentences have explicit theme-subjects,they disambiguate intervening and main themes, and indicate the contrast, the focus, the introduction of new narratives or the change of speaker's point of view. Sometimes direct speeches and deictic pronouns also need explicit theme-subjects in Polish sentences. On the other hand, the ellipsis of the theme-subject is marked in Russian even in colloquial and informal texts. The theme-subject can be deleted in Russian colloquial and informal texts, if the subject is a form of the first or the second person, or if the aspect and the tense of the antecedent sentence's verb are the same as those of the given sentence's verb and both the antecedent and the coreferential word have the nominative case.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. MROŻEK, Sławomir, "Ucieczka na południe" (2002), Noir sur Blanc
  2. МРОЖЕК, Славомир, "Бегство на юг, In Мои возлюбленные кривоножки(перевод Л.М.Цывьяна)", pp.5~194 (2000), Амфора
  3. 김명자, "현대 러시아어의 영형대용사 연구", 러시아어문학연구논집, (20), pp.137~161 (2005), 한국러시아문학회
  4. 이인영, "주제와 화제", 어학연구, 32(3), pp.61~99 (1996), 서울대학교 어학연구소
  5. 정정원, "폴란드어 무주어 재귀구문과 -no", -to 구문의 수동성과 능격성 연구, 2010, pp.25(3), 75~101[DOI]
  6. 정정원, "슬라브어 영형태(null-form)에 대한 소고: 무주어문, 탈락 그리고 화용론적 생략에 대하여", 슬라브어 연구, 17(2), pp.211~236 (2012), 한국슬라브어학회[DOI]
  7. 정정원, "슬라브어의 생략과 화제, 테마, 주어: 러시아어, 폴란드어, 체코어, 불가리아어 문어텍스트 분석", 러시아어문학연구논집, (42), pp.160~188 (2013), 한국러시아문학회
  8. COATS, Herbert, "Ellipsis in Russian", Russian Linguistics, 18(3), pp.281~298 (1994)
  9. FLASHNER, Vanessa, "The grammatical marking of theme in oral Polish narrative, In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse", pp.131~156 (1987), John Benjamins
  10. FRANKS, Steven, "On the status of null expletives", Lingua, 81, pp.1~24 (1990)
  11. FRANKS, Steven, "Null subject phenomena, In Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax", pp.287~332 (1995), Oxford University Press
  12. GIVÓN, Talmy, "Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction, In Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. (Typological Studies in Language, vol.3.)", pp.1~41 (1983), John Benjamins
  13. GIVÓN, Talmy, "Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement, In Subject and Topic", pp.149~188 (1976), Academic Press Inc
  14. GUNDEL, Jeanette K., "Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse", Language, 69(2), pp.274~307 (1993)
  15. HORN, L., "Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature", Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT'84), pp.11~42 (1984), Georgetown University Press
  16. HUANG, Yan, Anaphora, "Across-linguistic study" (2000), Oxford Univ. Press
  17. KIBRIK, Andrej A., "A cognitive calculative approach towards discourse anaphora", Proceedings of the Discourse anaphora and reference resolution conference(DAARC2000), pp.72~82 (2000), Lancaster University: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language
  18. KIBRIK, Andrej A., "Zero anaphora vs. zero person marking in Slavic: a chicken", egg dilemma?, 2004, 87~90[DOI]
  19. LIPIŃSKA, Ewa, "Kiedyś wrócisz tu....Kraków: Universitas", ~ (2001)
  20. McSHANE, Marjorie J., "Verbal Ellipsis in Russian, Polish and Czech", Slavic and East European Journal, 44(2), pp.195~233 (2000)
  21. McSHANE, Marjorie J., "A theory of ellipsis" (2005), Oxford Univ. Press
  22. MILLER, Jim, "Spontanous Spoken language. Syntax and discourse" (1998), Clarendon
  23. NICHOLS, Johanna, "The grammatical marking of theme in literary Russian, In Issues in Russian Morphosyntax", pp.170~186 (1985), Slavica
  24. PRINCE, Ellen F., "Toward a taxonomy of given-new information, In Radical pragmatics", pp.223~255 (1981), Academic Press
  25. БЕЛОШАПКОВА, В.А., "Современный русский язык" (1997), Азбуковник
  26. МЕЛЬЧУК, И.А., "Syntactic, or lexical, zero, In Русский язык в модели « смысл–текст»", pp.169~205 (1995), Языки русской культуры
  27. ПАДУЧЕВА, Е. В., "О семантике синтаксиса" (1974), Наука
  28. СКОВОРОДНИКОВ, А.П., "О критерии эллиптичности в русском синтаксисе", Вопросы Языкознания, (3), pp.114~123 (1973)
  29. ЯКОБСОН, Роман, "Нулевой знак, In Избранные работы", pp.222~230 (1985), Прогресс

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)