슬라브어의 생략과 화제, 테마, 주어: 러시아어, 폴란드어, 체코어, 불가리아어 문어텍스트 분석
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper deals with topicality, themehood and subjecthood of elliptical co-referent in Russian, Polish, Czech and Bulgarian literary texts. Grammatical subjects are ellipted more than any other components in all the analyzed Slavic texts. The subjecthood of the ellipted co-referent and the antecedent plays a crucial role especially in the ellipsis of Russian literary texts. As for topic and theme, they corelate with ellipsis on different levels. Topicality is a criterion for ellipsis on a sentence level, whereas themehood is a criterion for ellipsis on a text level. A theme is likely to be ellipted in Polish and Czech literary texts, where coreference reaches to an extrasentential antecedent. Polish and Czech pronouns of nominative case are rarely used to denote co-referentiality and null subject is unmarked. On the other hand, the use of explicit subjects are marked and it indicates the contrast or disambiguates intervening and main themes in Polish and Czech texts. Topicality is involved with ellipsis in Russian literary texts, where ellipted co-referent should have an intrasentential antecedent. Here co-referentiality outside the sentences can be indicated by pronouns. Coordinate construction, subjecthood of both the antecedent and the ellipted co-referent and short distance between co-referents are very important conditions for ellipsis of Russian literary texts. Bulgarian ellipsis in literary texts shares characteristics with both groups. Like Polish and Czech, the theme, even as a subject in the very beginning of a sentence can be ellipted and like Russian, pronouns are used relatively frequently.
Abstract
The paper deals with topicality, themehood and subjecthood of elliptical co-referent in Russian, Polish, Czech and Bulgarian literary texts. Grammatical subjects are ellipted more than any other components in all the analyzed Slavic texts. The subjecthood of the ellipted co-referent and the antecedent plays a crucial role especially in the ellipsis of Russian literary texts. As for topic and theme, they corelate with ellipsis on different levels. Topicality is a criterion for ellipsis on a sentence level, whereas themehood is a criterion for ellipsis on a text level. A theme is likely to be ellipted in Polish and Czech literary texts, where coreference reaches to an extrasentential antecedent. Polish and Czech pronouns of nominative case are rarely used to denote co-referentiality and null subject is unmarked. On the other hand, the use of explicit subjects are marked and it indicates the contrast or disambiguates intervening and main themes in Polish and Czech texts. Topicality is involved with ellipsis in Russian literary texts, where ellipted co-referent should have an intrasentential antecedent. Here co-referentiality outside the sentences can be indicated by pronouns. Coordinate construction, subjecthood of both the antecedent and the ellipted co-referent and short distance between co-referents are very important conditions for ellipsis of Russian literary texts. Bulgarian ellipsis in literary texts shares characteristics with both groups. Like Polish and Czech, the theme, even as a subject in the very beginning of a sentence can be ellipted and like Russian, pronouns are used relatively frequently.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김명자, "현대 러시아어의 영형대용사 연구", 러시아어문학연구논집, 20(20), pp.137~161 (2005), 한국러시아문학회
- 남혜현, "러시아어 영주어의 지시적 속성: 생략과 통사적 제로", 슬라브어 연구, 10, pp.303~318 (2005), 한국슬라브어학회
- 서승현, "슬라브어에서 영주어의 매개 변항(null subject parameters)에 대한 연구", 노어노문학, 14(1), pp.53~78 (2002), 한국노어노문학회
- 서승현, "슬라브어의 대명사 주어의 탈락(pro-drop)과 유표성(markedness)과의 관계", 슬라브硏究, 22(1), pp.345~370 (2006), 러시아연구소
- 엄순천, "생략(эллипсис)의 개념과 조건 및 대상: 현대 러시아어 구어체 담화를 중심으로", 러시아어문학연구논집, (21), pp.383~410 (2006), 한국러시아문학회
- 엄순천, "생략(эллипсис)의 담화기능 및 유형: 현대 러시아어 구어체 담화를 중심으로", 노어노문학, 18(1), pp.3~33 (2006), 한국노어노문학회
- 이은순, "러시아 선행사 명사구의 생략과 대명사화", 노어노문학, 19(2), pp.51~78 (2007), 한국노어노문학회
- 이인영, "주제와 화제", 어학연구, 32(3), pp.61~99 (1996)
- 정정원, "슬라브어 영형태(null-form)에 대한 소고: 무주어문, 탈락 그리고 화용론적 생략에 대하여", 슬라브어 연구, 17(2), pp.211~236 (2012), 한국슬라브어학회[DOI]
- Flashner, V., "The grammatical marking of theme in oral Polish narrative, In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse", pp.131~156 (1987), John Benjamins
- Franks, S., "On the status of null expletives", Lingua, 81, pp.1~24 (1990)
- Franks, S., "Null subject phenomena, In Parameters of Slavic Morpho- syntax", pp.287~332 (1995), Oxford University Press
- Givón, T., "Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction, In Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. (Typological Studies in Language, vol.3.)", pp.1~41 (1983), JohnBenjamins
- Givón, T., "Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement, In Subject and Topic", pp.149~188 (1976), Academic Press Inc
- Gundel, J. K., "Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse", Language, 69(2), pp.274~307 (1993)
- Kibrik, A. A., "A cognitive calculative approach towards discourse anaphora", Proceedings of the Discourse anaphora and reference resolution confer- ence(DAARC2000) (2000)
- Kibrik, A. A., "Zero anaphora vs. zero person marking in Slavic: a chicken", egg dilemma?, 2004, 87~90
- McShane, M. J., "Verbal Ellipsis in Russian, Polish and Czech", Slavic and East European Journal, 44(2), pp.195~233 (2000)
- McShane, M. J., "A theory of ellipsis" (2005), Oxford Univ. Press
- Nichols, J., "The grammatical marking of theme in literary Russian, In Issues in Russian Morphosyntax", pp.170~186 (1985), Slavica
- Prince, E. F., "Toward a taxonomy of given-new information, In Radical pragmatics", pp.223~255 (1981), Academic Press
- Szczegielniak, A., "VP Ellipsis and Topicalization", NELS35 Proceedings, pp.603~615 (2006)
- Quirk, R., "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman