형사절차상 연하물 강제배출의 허용성과 그 한계
Allowance and Limit of Forced Outlets of Objects in a Throat on Criminal Procedure
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
These days, with advancement of scientific investigation method, the process of evidence collection has been on gradual increase of cases to the entire human body as an objective and core evidence collecting means. Nevertheless, the investigation about inside body has no little possibility to cause the physical disability and damage of the object or significantly infringe on personality right by nature. After all, in the process of discovering substantial truth, it is an issue to be discussed from the viewpoint of how to protect the human right of the party concerned. Here it will not always desirable to absolutely deny and prohibit forced outlets of objects in a throat conducted under very strict requirements and standards before proceeding research into other substitute means except for forced outlets of objects in a throat. Finally, it will have to accept that to the category of law by setting out written provisions on stern requirements and procedures to minimize infringement on personality right. So we can refer to § 81a, the criminal procedure law, Germany from a theory of legislation.
Abstract
These days, with advancement of scientific investigation method, the process of evidence collection has been on gradual increase of cases to the entire human body as an objective and core evidence collecting means. Nevertheless, the investigation about inside body has no little possibility to cause the physical disability and damage of the object or significantly infringe on personality right by nature. After all, in the process of discovering substantial truth, it is an issue to be discussed from the viewpoint of how to protect the human right of the party concerned. Here it will not always desirable to absolutely deny and prohibit forced outlets of objects in a throat conducted under very strict requirements and standards before proceeding research into other substitute means except for forced outlets of objects in a throat. Finally, it will have to accept that to the category of law by setting out written provisions on stern requirements and procedures to minimize infringement on personality right. So we can refer to § 81a, the criminal procedure law, Germany from a theory of legislation.
참고문헌 (31)
- 강구진, "형사소송법원론" (1982), 학연사
- 김기두, "형사소송법 전정신판" (1987), 박영사
- 노명선, "형사소송법" (2009), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 배종대, "신형사소송법" (2008), 홍문사
- 백형구, "알기쉬운 형사소송법 제4판" (2007), 박영사
- 백형구, "형사소송법강의(신정2판)" (1996), 박영사
- 서일교, "형사소송법 제8개정판" (1979), 박영사
- 손동권, "형사소송법" (2010), 세창사
- 송광섭, "형사소송법 신정판" (2003), 유스티니아누스
- 신동운, "신형사소송법" (2009), 법문사
- 신양균, "형사소송법" (2009), 법문사
- 신현주, "형사소송법 신정2판" (2002), 박영사
- 심희기, "형사소송법의 쟁점 제2판" (2002), 삼영사
- 이영란, "한국형사소송법(개정판)" (2008), 나남
- 이은모, "형사소송법" (2010), 박영사
- 이재상, "형사소송법 제2판" (2010), 박영사
- 임동규, "형사소송법 제6판" (2009), 법문사
- 정영석, "형사소송법(4전정판)" (1982), 법문사
- 정영석, "형사소송법" (1994), 법문사
- 정웅석, "형사소송법 전정제1판" (2007), 대명출판사
- 진계호, "형사소송법" (2000), 형설출판사
- 차용석, "주석 형사소송법Ⅰ(제3판)" (1998), 한국사법행정학회
- 차용석, "형사소송법" (1997), 세영사
- 차용석, "형사소송법 제3판" (2008), 21세기사
- 권순민, "형사절차상 체액의 강제채취에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.2003
- 백형구, "체내 강제수사", 저스티스, 17 (1984), 한국법학원
- 백형구, "체내수사의 허용성", 법률신문, (1570) (1984), 법률신문사
- 서태경, "刑事訴訟法上 身體內部에 대한 强制搜査의 節次와 限界", 한양법학, (24), pp.385~413 (2008), 한양법학회
- 조국, "수사상 검증의 적법성 - 사진 및 무음향 비디오 촬영과 신체검사를 중심으로", 형사법연구, (20), pp.297~322 (2003), 한국형사법학회
- Werner Beulke, "Strafprozessrecht, 8. Aufl", ~ (2005)
- Hans-Heiner Kühne, "Strafprozessrecht, 7. Aufl", ~ (2007)
