复杂事件“V+成”结构的认知运作与语义类别研究
On Cognitive Operation and Semantics of Complex Event Construction “V+cheng(成)”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
On the framework of event integration theory(Talmy 2000) and aspect shifting theory(Pustejovsky 1991), the article analyzes the cognitive operation and semantic meaning of complex event construction “V+cheng(成)”. It is proposed that semantically the main verbs in the construction express either “activity”, or “achievement”, or “state” in Vendler’s (1957) system, and the whole construction render “accomplishment” events. In cognition, this construction represents event integration and semantic blending of two causally related simple events. They are realized as a grammatical integration on the language surface, that is, “V+cheng(成)” construction. These properties are specific for a language like Chinese as they are not observed in languages like English or French. The semantic meanings of the construction are also analyzed, which are: caused to be transformed, caused to be presented and caused to be existence, and the first one is its basic meaning, while the last one is its typical meaning.
Abstract
On the framework of event integration theory(Talmy 2000) and aspect shifting theory(Pustejovsky 1991), the article analyzes the cognitive operation and semantic meaning of complex event construction “V+cheng(成)”. It is proposed that semantically the main verbs in the construction express either “activity”, or “achievement”, or “state” in Vendler’s (1957) system, and the whole construction render “accomplishment” events. In cognition, this construction represents event integration and semantic blending of two causally related simple events. They are realized as a grammatical integration on the language surface, that is, “V+cheng(成)” construction. These properties are specific for a language like Chinese as they are not observed in languages like English or French. The semantic meanings of the construction are also analyzed, which are: caused to be transformed, caused to be presented and caused to be existence, and the first one is its basic meaning, while the last one is its typical meaning.
참고문헌 (23)
- Andrews, Avery D, "The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase, In Language typology and syntactic description Ⅰ: Clause Structure" (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Bach, Emmom, "The Algebra of Events", Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1), pp.5~16 (1986)
- Chang, Jung-hsing, "The Syntax Of Event Structure In Chinese", 박사, pp.2001
- Hopper, Paul J., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56 (1980)
- Levin, Beth, "Objecthood: An Event Structure Perspective", Proceedings of CLS 35, volume 1: The Main Session, Chicago Linguistic Society (1999), University of Chicago
- Pustejovsky, James, "The Syntax of Event Structure", Cognition, 41 (1991)
- Rothstein, Susan, "Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
- Smith, Carlota, "The Parameter of Aspect" (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume II: Typology and process in concept structuring" (2000), MIT Press
- Teng，Shou-hsin, "Verb Classification and Its Pedagogical Extensions, In Studies on Modern Chinese Syntax" (2005), Crane Publishing
- Vendler, Zeno, "Verbs and Times", The Philosophical Review, 66(2), pp.143~160 (1957)
- 陈昌来, "论成事及其相关动词", 汉语学习, 3 (2002)
- 邓守信, "汉语动词的时间结构", 语言教学与研究, 4 (1985)
- 冯广艺, "“V成”结构的变异与应用", 湘潭师范学院学报, 6 (2002)
- 金立鑫, "试论行为类型、情状类型及其与体的关系", 语言教学与研究, 4 (2008)
- 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 孟琮, "汉语动词用法词典" (1999), 商务印书馆
- 孟艳华, "事件建构与现代汉语结果宾语句研究", 박사, pp.2009
- 邵敬敏, "“V成”句式的语义分析", 逻辑与语言学习, 5 (1990)
- 吴为章, "“成为”类复合动词探讨", 中国语文, 4 (1985)
- 徐枢, "宾语和补语" (1985), 黑龙江人民出版社
- 玄钥, "“V成”述补结构的句法形式", 华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）, 4 (2006)
- 赵贤德, "常规性“V成”结构中的“V”的考察分析", 阜阳师范学院学报（社会科学版）, 3 (2006)