본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국어 결과보어 구문과 한국어 번역문 사건 구조에 대한 인지적 분석

Cognitive Analysis of Event Structure in Chinese [V+R] structure and Korean Translation

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Omission is the most common error of Korean learners using Chinese [V+R] structure. This paper analyzed the causes of omissions by cognitive analysis. Chinese [V+R] structure has a strong property of a macro event. Korean cannot recognize macro events in Chinese, and separate the macro event as a single event. As a result, Korean learners make false sentences that do not properly meet the event structure required by the [V+R] structure.

Abstract

Omission is the most common error of Korean learners using Chinese [V+R] structure. This paper analyzed the causes of omissions by cognitive analysis. Chinese [V+R] structure has a strong property of a macro event. Korean cannot recognize macro events in Chinese, and separate the macro event as a single event. As a result, Korean learners make false sentences that do not properly meet the event structure required by the [V+R] structure.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 김윤정, "현대중국어 보어의 완료상 연구", 담화와 인지, 14(3), pp.1~24 (2007), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  2. 윤서희, "한어 결과보어의 한국어 번역에 관한 연구", 동북아 문화연구, 1(18), pp.267~284 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  3. Bohenemeyer, J., "Principles of Event Segmentation in Language : The Case of Motion Events", Language, 83(3), pp.495~532 (2007)
  4. Talmy, L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantics" (2000), MIT Press
  5. 맹주억, "基于语料库与测试的韩国学习者结果补语习得研究", 중국언어연구, (81), pp.369~401 (2019), 한국중국언어학회[DOI]
  6. 李銀京, "韓國留學生漢語結果補語偏誤分析", 碩士, pp.2009
  7. 劉月華, "實用現代漢語語法" (2011), 商務印書館
  8. 송연, "韩国学生汉语结果补语偏误原因对比探析", 중국어교육과 연구, (14), pp.137~148 (2011), 한국중국어교육학회
  9. 袁毅敏, "基於宏事件特征的漢語動結式時體問題的認知實證研究", 外語教學, 36(5), pp.49~53 (2015)
  10. 趙金銘, "漢語動結式二字詞組及其教學處理", 世界漢語教學, 30(2), pp.253~263 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)