송옥의 <高唐賦> <神女賦> 연구
A Study of Songok(宋玉)’s <Godangbu(高唐賦)> <Sinnyeobu(神女賦)>
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Songok(宋玉)’s <Godangbu高唐賦> and <Sinnyeobu神女賦> were not in Wangil(王逸)’s ≪Chosajanggu楚辭章句≫, additionally those were not compositions that offspring composited in ≪Jeonhanbu全漢賦≫. So chinese scholars who researched about Chosa(楚辭) and Hanbu(漢賦) didn’t research those two <Godangbu高唐賦> and <Sinnyeobu神女賦>. Additionally those compositions contain sensualitic contains, so chinese confucianists didn’t want to research those. But in the Cho(楚) province of Jeanguk(戰國) era and Han(漢) empire, sensualitic atmosphere was in fashion. Songok(宋玉)’s two compositions were obviously sensualitic contains. But a few chinese scholars analyzed as the relationships about king and retainers. Those two compositions are Songok(宋玉)’s answers about Cho(楚) Yang(襄) king’s questions. <Godangbu高唐賦> contained about beautiful scenery in the Godang(高唐) and <Sinnyeobu神女賦> contained about beautiful woman who lived in the Godang(高唐).
Abstract
Songok(宋玉)’s <Godangbu高唐賦> and <Sinnyeobu神女賦> were not in Wangil(王逸)’s ≪Chosajanggu楚辭章句≫, additionally those were not compositions that offspring composited in ≪Jeonhanbu全漢賦≫. So chinese scholars who researched about Chosa(楚辭) and Hanbu(漢賦) didn’t research those two <Godangbu高唐賦> and <Sinnyeobu神女賦>. Additionally those compositions contain sensualitic contains, so chinese confucianists didn’t want to research those. But in the Cho(楚) province of Jeanguk(戰國) era and Han(漢) empire, sensualitic atmosphere was in fashion. Songok(宋玉)’s two compositions were obviously sensualitic contains. But a few chinese scholars analyzed as the relationships about king and retainers. Those two compositions are Songok(宋玉)’s answers about Cho(楚) Yang(襄) king’s questions. <Godangbu高唐賦> contained about beautiful scenery in the Godang(高唐) and <Sinnyeobu神女賦> contained about beautiful woman who lived in the Godang(高唐).
참고문헌 (23)
- 王逸章句, "楚辭章句" (1937), 상무인서관
- 洪興祖, "楚辭補注" (1981), 예문인서관
- 朱熹, "楚辭集注, 楚辭後語, 楚辭辯證" (1953), 인민문학출판사
- 작가출판사, "楚辭硏究論文集" (1957), 작가출판사
- 游國恩, "楚辭論文集" (1955), 상해문예련합출판사
- 游國恩, "楚辭槪論" (1979), 인인문고
- 謝无量, "楚辭新論" (1962), 상무인서관
- 吳天任, "楚辭文學的特質" (1977), 인인문고
- 何天行, "楚辭作於漢代考" (1948), 중화서국
- 藤野岩友, "楚辭, In 한시대계 제 3권" (1983), 집영사
- 橋川時雄, "楚辭, In 동양사상총서" (1982), 일본평론사
- 竹治貞夫, "楚辭硏究" (1978), 풍간서방
- 星天淸孝, "楚辭の硏究" (1961), 양덕사
- 김인규, "楚辭" (1988), 청아출판사
- 李曰剛, "辭賦流變史" (1987), 문진출판사
- 張書文, "楚辭到漢賦的衍變" (1983), 정중서국
- 劉剛, "宋玉辭賦考論" (2006), 遼海풀판사
- 胡念胎, "宋玉作品的眞僞問題", 상해 문학유산, 1, pp.40~55
- 楊胤宗, "宋玉賦考", 대륙잡지, 27(3), pp.19~24 (1963)
- 楊胤宗, "宋玉賦考", 대륙잡지, 27(4), pp.26~32 (1963)
- 金學主, "離騷의 性格" (1979), 동아문화연구소
- 김인호, "楚辭의 巫歌的 性格 考察", 석사, pp.1983
- 김인호, "辭⋅賦 名稱 由來考", 중국어문학 (1987)