공공거버넌스 개념의 구성요소 분석과 시사점 - ‘대안적 국정운영 패턴’ 가능성 제기를 중심으로 -
Analysis of Core Components of Public Governance and its Implications - Exploring a new possibility as an “alternative pattern of rule” -
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nowadays, hierarchical bureaucracy is no longer considered as sufficient to decide and implement general public policy including public security policy, and this situation has facilitated academic research on the concept of governance. In Korea, since the 1980s, noticeably the 1990s, new systems based on New Public Management or network have been established as a pattern of rule, which conducts state of affairs. Even though the concept of governance has been considerably introduced in the field of public policy, its rationale and practical format have not been well researched. With this situation in mind, the writer attempts to explain how the features of governance should evolve into a practical alternative by examining its historical contexts and conducting trait analysis. With the emergence of neo-liberalism, the introduction of New Public Management and network, and an emphasis on citizen movement in the radicals, socialists and anarchists, there has been an array of controversy over the definition of governance. However, most of the definitions have a tendency to put an emphasis on the expansion of social network only. When it comes to the definition, the article analyzes four elements: network, dialogue and deliberation, accountability, and democratic legitimacy. Here, the article primarily stresses the importance of the role of governance as a practical means to complement and overcome limitations of hierarchical bureaucracy. In this article, the writer defines governance as an “alternative pattern of rule”. This definition is basically derived from Bevir’s definition, “a pattern of rule”. The current stage of Korea’s governance is at the stage of expansion, far beyond the experimental stage, which means that the terminology of governance should be institutionalized and legalized. One of the priorities in this matter is to enhance the level of its definition and institutionalization by an interdisciplinary approach including public law.
Abstract
Nowadays, hierarchical bureaucracy is no longer considered as sufficient to decide and implement general public policy including public security policy, and this situation has facilitated academic research on the concept of governance. In Korea, since the 1980s, noticeably the 1990s, new systems based on New Public Management or network have been established as a pattern of rule, which conducts state of affairs. Even though the concept of governance has been considerably introduced in the field of public policy, its rationale and practical format have not been well researched. With this situation in mind, the writer attempts to explain how the features of governance should evolve into a practical alternative by examining its historical contexts and conducting trait analysis. With the emergence of neo-liberalism, the introduction of New Public Management and network, and an emphasis on citizen movement in the radicals, socialists and anarchists, there has been an array of controversy over the definition of governance. However, most of the definitions have a tendency to put an emphasis on the expansion of social network only. When it comes to the definition, the article analyzes four elements: network, dialogue and deliberation, accountability, and democratic legitimacy. Here, the article primarily stresses the importance of the role of governance as a practical means to complement and overcome limitations of hierarchical bureaucracy. In this article, the writer defines governance as an “alternative pattern of rule”. This definition is basically derived from Bevir’s definition, “a pattern of rule”. The current stage of Korea’s governance is at the stage of expansion, far beyond the experimental stage, which means that the terminology of governance should be institutionalized and legalized. One of the priorities in this matter is to enhance the level of its definition and institutionalization by an interdisciplinary approach including public law.
참고문헌 (76)
- 김광웅, "우리는 미래에 무엇을 공부할 것인가" (2009), 생각의 나무
- 김석준, "뉴거버넌스 연구" (2000), 대영문화사
- 김석, "뉴거버넌스와 사이버거버넌스 연구" (2001), 대영문화사
- 김연수, "정부혁신과 제도" (2007), 한국학술정보
- 김준기, "정부와 NGO" (2006), 박영사
- 박정훈, "행정법의 체계와 방법론" (2005), 박영사
- 오석홍, "조직이론" (1999), 박영사
- 오수길, "뉴거버넌스" (2008), 대영문화사
- 정용덕, "현대국가의 행정학" (2001), 법문사
- 지역 발전을 위한 거버넌스 체계 구축 및 운용방안 연구, "차미숙", 국토연구원, ~ (2003)
- 최영출, "지역경쟁력 강화와 로컬 거버넌스" (2006), 대영문화사
- 파트릭 펠루, "환자를 위한 나라는 없다" (2008), 프로네시스
- 하연섭, "제도분석:이론과 쟁점" (2003), 다산
- 홍준형, "환경법" (2001), 박영사
- Bevir, Mark, "What is Governance? Public Governance(Ⅰ)" (2007), SAGE Publications Ltd
- Bevir, Mark, "Theories of Governance, Public Governance(Ⅰ)" (2007), SAGE Publications Ltd
- Kooiman, Jan, "Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions" (1994), Sage
- Kooiman, Jan, "Societal Governance: Levels, Modes, and Orders of Social-Political Interaction. in:Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy" (2000)
- Osborne David, "Community-owned Government: Empowering Rather than Serving. in: Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector" (1992)
- Rhodes, R.A.W, "Understanding Governance" (1997), Open University Press
- Scharpf,Fritz W, "Coordination in Hierarchies and Networks. in: Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions" (1993)
- Wright,Vincent, "The Paradoxes of Administrative Reform. in:Public management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe" (1997)
- 권해수, "시민단체의 조직화 과정과 정책변화에 대한 영향력 비교 연구", 한국사회와 행정연구, 10(1) (1999)
- 김정렬, "정부의 미래와 거버넌스:신공공관리와 정책네트워크", 한국행정학보, 34(1) (2000)
- 김정렬, "거버넌스와 행정국가", 대한정치학회보, 10(3), pp.23~44 (2003), 대한정치학회
- 김종래, "환경분야의 정부 및 NGO관계의 정책방향", 2000년도 한국행정학회세미나 (2000)
- 김준기, "비영리단체(NGOs)의 생성과 일반적 행태: 주인-대리인 이론의 관점에서", 행정논총, 36(1), pp.1~25 (1998)
- 김준기, "한국 비영리단체(NGOs)의 사회․경제적 역할에 대한 연구", 행정논총, 37(1) (1999)
- 김준기, "정부업무의 외부 위탁비용에 관한 연구: 계약이론의 관점에서", 한국행정학보, 33(4) (2000)
- 김준기, "정부-NGO 관계의 이론적 고찰: 자원의존모형의 관점에서", 한국행정학보, 9(1) (2000)
- 김준기, "한국에서의 ‘제3자적 정부’에 대한 논의", 행정논총, 39(2) (2001)
- 김준기,한국시민사회의 내부지배구조 개선방안에 관한 연구", "한국시민사회의 내부지배구조 개선방안에 관한 연구", 2004년도 동계학술대회 (2004), 한국행정학회
- 문인수, "거버넌스 패러다임으로서 파트너십 전략의 활용방안", 한국정책과학학회보, 6(3), pp.53~76 (2002), 한국정책과학학회
- 배응환, "협력적 로컬거버넌스의 대두 : 천안시 환경기초시설정책사례를 중심으로", 2004년도 하계학술대회 (2004), 한국행정학회
- 송희준, "국가와 시민사회의 관계-이론적 개관과 실천적 전망", 한국행정연구, 8(1) (1999)
- 오수길, "주민참여제도의 활용과 효능감 분석 -시민사회단체의 경험과 인식을 중심으로-", 한국행정논집, 20(4), pp.1179~1207 (2008), 한국정부학회
- 유재원, "정부인가 거버넌스인가? 계층제인가 네트워크인가?", 한국행정학보, 39(1) (2005), 한국행정학회
- 이상수, "신제도주의 접근을 통한 경찰 신뢰 행정의 구현방안 연구", 치안정책연구, 22 (2008)
- 이재광, "과잉생산경제와 거버넌스: 거버넌스의 기원에 관한 소고", 한국정책학회보, 17(2), pp.263~290 (2008), 한국정책학회
- 이종원, "레짐이론의 발전과 과제", 정부학 연구, 5(2) (1999)
- 최병선, "준공공부문 조직 연구의 방향 모색", 행정논총, 31(1) (1993)
- 최종원, "한국의 정부기업관계 진화과정 분석", 행정논총, 37(1) (1999)
- 하승창, "정보화 사회의 시민운동-정보기술,시민사회,그리고 지식인의 역할", 한국비영리학회, 2002년 춘계학술대회 (2002), 한국비영리학회
- 하연섭, "신제도주의의최근경향:이론적 자기 혁신과 수렴", 한국행정학보, 36(4), pp.339~359 (2002), 한국행정학회
- 홍성만, "지역갈등의 발생과 대응전략 ; 광역 자치단체(시․도)와 기초 자치단체(시․군․구)간 갈등과 해소과정", 지방행정, 53 (2004), 대한지방행정공제회
- Agranoff, Robert, "Managing in Network Settings", Policy Studies Review, 16(1) (1999)
- Bevir, Mark, "A Decentred Theory of Governance. in:Governance as Social and Political Communication" (2003)
- Bevir, Mark, "Governance and Interpretation: What are the Implication of Postfoundationalism?", Public Administration Review, 82(3) (2004)
- Bevir, Mark, "Democratic Governance: Systems and Radical Perspectives", Public Administration Review, 66(3) (2006)
- David Osborne, "Community-owned Government: Empowering Rather than Serving, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector" (1992)
- Denhardt, Robert B, "The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering", Public Administration Review, 60(6) (2000)
- Farazmand, Ali, "Globalization and Public Administration", Public Administration Review, 59(6) (1999)
- Frederickson. H. G, "The Repositional of American Public Administration", Paper presented at the Special Seminar in the Ewha Womans University (2000)
- 학술지(정기간행물) 학술대회논문 단행본 보고서 학위논문 인터넷자원 기타자료 Hardin, Garrett, "The Tragedy of the Commons", Science, 162 (1968)
- Huxham, Chris, "The Challenge of Collaborative Governance", Public Management, 2(3) (2000)
- James G. March, "The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life", American Political Review, 78 (1984)
- Jessop, Bob, "The Regulation Approach", The Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(3) (1997)
- Jones. C, "A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanism", Academy of Management Review, 22(2), pp.911~945 (1977)
- Keast, R, "Mixing state, market and network governance, modes: the role of government in ‘crowded’ policy domains", International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9(1) (2006)
- Kettl, Donald F, "The Global Revolution in Public Management: Driving Themes, Missing Links", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(3) (1997)
- Kooiman,Jan, "Governance and Governability: Using Complexity, Dynamics, and Diversity. in:Modern Governance: New Government- Society Interactions" (1994), Sage
- Kooiman, Jan, "Self-Governance as a Mode of Societal Governance", Public Management, 2(3) (2000)
- Lowndes V, "The dynamics of multiorganisational partnerships:an analysis of changing modes of governance", 1(76) (1996)
- Mark Considine, "Governance at Ground Level: The Frontline Bureaucrat in the Age of Markets and Networks", Public Administration Review, 59(6) (1999)
- Marleen Brans, "The Autopoiesis of Administrative Systems: Niklas Luhman on Public Administration and Public Policy", 75(3) (1997)
- Meuleman. L, "Internal Meta-Governance as a New Challenge for Management Development in Public Administration", 2006 EFMD Conference Post Bureaucratic Management: A New Age for Public Services? Aix-en-Provence (2006)
- Rhodes, R.A.W, "The New Governance : Governing without government", Political Studies, ⅩLⅣ (1996)
- Rhodes, R.A.W, "From Marketisation to Diplomacy: It's the Mix that Matters", Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56(2) (1997)
- Vigoda, Eran, "From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration", Public Administration Review, 62(5) (2002)
- Lowndes, Vivien, "The Dynamics of Multi-Organizational Partnerships: An Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance", Public Administration, 76(2) (1998)
- Scharpf, Fritz W, "Coordination in Hierarchies and Networks. in:Games in Hierarchies and Networks" (1993)
- Stoker, G, "Governance as Theory : Five Propositions", Governanceinternational Social Science Journal, 155 (1998)
- Vigoda, Eran, "From Responsiveness to Collaboration : Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration", Public Administration Review, 62(5) (2002)
- Vivien Lowndes, "The Dynamics of Multi-Organizational Partnerships : An Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance", Public Administration, 76(2) (1998)
- Williamson, Oliver E, "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance Of Contractual Relations", The Journal of Law and Economics, 22 (1979)
- Wright, Vincent, "The Paradoxes of Administrative Reform" (1997), Public management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe