활용과 관련된 ‘한글 맞춤법 준말 규정’에 대한 비판적 검토

Abstract

Paragraphs 34, 35, 36, and 38 of 'Junmal(reduced form)' regulations in 'Hangeul orthography' stipulate the method of notation of morphological changes in conjugation. These conjugations are the forms in which syllabic reduction appears as a result of vowel deletion or glide formation. Paragraphs 34-38 have nothing to do with Hangeul orthography in that they do not define the correctness or wrongness of any notation. These clauses are regulations for describing reduced forms. In this paper, it is argued that paragraphs 34-38 should be rearranged as 'Section 2 stem and ending regulations', not 'Junmal' in 'Hangeul orthography'. This is because these paragraphs have the common feature of 'conjugation and syllabic reduction', and contents on the conjugation of V+V-type phonological chains are absent in 'Section 2 stem and ending'. For this reason, the conjugation clause for V+V-type chains(paragraphs 17-20) was newly composed in Section 2. Each clause was arranged in the order of 'mandatory phonological rules → optional phonological rules → individual phenomenon of words' based on the order of 'Kanada'. And the mandatory phonological rules became the main items, and optional phonological rules and the individual lexical phenomena were constituted as 'attachments'. Paragraphs 17-20 are rules for conjugation, so the descriptive terms were unified as 'a stem ending in V is combined with a ending starting with V'. Vowel deletions according to the mandatory phonological rules are described as 'a is not allowed'. On the other hand, Vowel deletions according to the optional phonological rules are described as 'allowing a and b'. This study supplemented the gaps in the existing conjugations clauses by critically examining the regulations of Junmal and placing the regular conjugations of V+V-type phonological chains in the section 2.