본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현행 「한글 맞춤법」 준말 규정에 대한 일고

A study on the abbreviation rules for the current 『Hangeul Matchumbeop(1988)』

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper aims to review the abbreviation rules in the current “Hangeul Matchumbeop”(한글맞춤법, 1988) and to highlight the problems associated with these rules and to also propose a road-map to correct and improve them. To this end, Chapter 2 examines the evolutionary process up to the current “Hangeul Matchumbeop(한글맞춤법, 1988)” rules. The abbreviation notation first appeared as a separate code from the “Hangeul Matchumbeop Tongiran”(한글마춤법 통일안, 1933) and later, the revision of the rules was discussed in the “Hangeul Matchumbeop revision draft”(한글맞춤법 개정 시안, 1978) conducted by the Ministry of Education which led to the current regulations. In Chapter 3, each regulation was reviewed to examine the aptness of the abbreviation rules of the current “Hangeul Matchumbeop”(한글맞춤법, 1988). In particular, 2,526 abbreviated head-words listed as head-words in the “Pyojun-Gugeo-Daesajeon”(표준국어대사전) under the current code were compared. Thereafter the appropriateness of the rules was reviewed in a direction in which all the abbreviation-related head-words could be explained, and the direction of revision was briefly considered. In Chapter 4, we synthesized the current body of data and presented the revised abbreviation rules proposed by this study. The most important thing to consider in the revision process is practicality and conciseness. Therefore, while there are 9 abbreviations in the “Hangeul Matchumbeop”(한글맞춤법, 1988), in this study, 2 more were added and a total of 11 abbreviations were proposed. In addition to the two newly added provisions, the existing rules were also revised in terms of detail by changing the attached provisions or changing the examples. Finally, Chapter 5 summarizes this study. This study is meaningful in that it reveals the problems of the abbreviation rules, which have not been treated as important in studies related to Korean spelling, and in that it suggests the direction for further revision.

Abstract

This paper aims to review the abbreviation rules in the current “Hangeul Matchumbeop”(한글맞춤법, 1988) and to highlight the problems associated with these rules and to also propose a road-map to correct and improve them. To this end, Chapter 2 examines the evolutionary process up to the current “Hangeul Matchumbeop(한글맞춤법, 1988)” rules. The abbreviation notation first appeared as a separate code from the “Hangeul Matchumbeop Tongiran”(한글마춤법 통일안, 1933) and later, the revision of the rules was discussed in the “Hangeul Matchumbeop revision draft”(한글맞춤법 개정 시안, 1978) conducted by the Ministry of Education which led to the current regulations. In Chapter 3, each regulation was reviewed to examine the aptness of the abbreviation rules of the current “Hangeul Matchumbeop”(한글맞춤법, 1988). In particular, 2,526 abbreviated head-words listed as head-words in the “Pyojun-Gugeo-Daesajeon”(표준국어대사전) under the current code were compared. Thereafter the appropriateness of the rules was reviewed in a direction in which all the abbreviation-related head-words could be explained, and the direction of revision was briefly considered. In Chapter 4, we synthesized the current body of data and presented the revised abbreviation rules proposed by this study. The most important thing to consider in the revision process is practicality and conciseness. Therefore, while there are 9 abbreviations in the “Hangeul Matchumbeop”(한글맞춤법, 1988), in this study, 2 more were added and a total of 11 abbreviations were proposed. In addition to the two newly added provisions, the existing rules were also revised in terms of detail by changing the attached provisions or changing the examples. Finally, Chapter 5 summarizes this study. This study is meaningful in that it reveals the problems of the abbreviation rules, which have not been treated as important in studies related to Korean spelling, and in that it suggests the direction for further revision.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 구본관, "한국어 문법 총론 1: 개관, 음운, 형태, 통사" (2015), 집문당
  2. 김정수, "한글 맞춤법의 역사와 개선안", 한국언어문화, (37), pp.111~128 (2008), 한국언어문화학회
  3. 리의도, "한국어 한글 표기법의 변천", 한글, (301), pp.143~218 (2013), 한글학회
  4. 박갑수, "표준어 정책의 회고와 반성", 새국어생활, 14(1), pp.5~22 (2004), 국립국어원
  5. 송창선, "‘-고 하-’의 탈락과 ‘-X고 해’의 축약 현상", 우리말글, 69, pp.1~21 (2016), 우리말글학회[DOI]
  6. 송철의, "준말에 대한 형태·음운론적 고찰", 동양학, 23(1), pp.25~49 (1993), 단국대학교 동양학연구소
  7. 연규동, "한글 맞춤법의 잉여성과 간결성", 한글, 82(2), pp.429~453 (2021), 한글학회[DOI]
  8. 이재현, "현대 국어의 축소어형에 관한 연구-축소어형과 준말의 정의, 축소어형의 조어법을 중심으로-", 한민족문화연구, (17), pp.275~401 (2005), 한민족문화학회
  9. 이재현, "현대 국어 축소어형의 사용 양상 연구" (2010), 역락
  10. 이진호, "국어 음운론 강의" (2014), 삼경문화사
  11. 최은경, "한국어 교육을 위한 준말 종결형식 연구", 박사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2011
  12. 한국어문교육연구회, "현실화되는 우리말과 글 -4개 어문관계 표기법개정시안 골자", 어문연구, 7(1), pp.163~165 (1979), 한국어문교육연구회
  13. "고려대 한국어대사전" (2022), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원[URL]
  14. "표준국어대사전" (2022), 국립국어원[URL]
  15. "연세한국어사전" (2022), 연세대학교 언어정보연구원[URL]

관련 논문AI추천