재산범죄에서 이득액에 관한 연구
A Study on the Benefit Amount in Property Crimes
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to benefit amount punishes the Additional Punishment Law of Special Property Crime in Korea differently. Like this, if the benefit amount in the property crime is applicable to the crime constituent, man should prove this by the strict proof, so that the benefit amount must be confirmed or can be confirmed. As a result shows the decision of the benefit amount the possibility which grasps whether the property crime in Korea is the dangerous tiger or the invasion tiger. If man cannot determine the benefit amount, that is nothing but a possibility of the benefit still. That means to not reach to the formation of the property crime. Because man understands the fixed need of the benefit amount about protection of the property crime as the invasion crime. The potential future benefit is not the real benefit in the Additional Punishment Law of Special Property Crime. Therefore, this property crime must not be in the dangerous crime. When moreover calculating the value of the benefit, the specification of the benefit amount is required.
Abstract
According to benefit amount punishes the Additional Punishment Law of Special Property Crime in Korea differently. Like this, if the benefit amount in the property crime is applicable to the crime constituent, man should prove this by the strict proof, so that the benefit amount must be confirmed or can be confirmed. As a result shows the decision of the benefit amount the possibility which grasps whether the property crime in Korea is the dangerous tiger or the invasion tiger. If man cannot determine the benefit amount, that is nothing but a possibility of the benefit still. That means to not reach to the formation of the property crime. Because man understands the fixed need of the benefit amount about protection of the property crime as the invasion crime. The potential future benefit is not the real benefit in the Additional Punishment Law of Special Property Crime. Therefore, this property crime must not be in the dangerous crime. When moreover calculating the value of the benefit, the specification of the benefit amount is required.
참고문헌 (18)
- 강구진, "형법강의 각론1" (1984), 박영사
- 김성돈, "형법각론" (2010), 성균관대 출판부
- 김일수, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 권오걸, "형법총론" (2009), 형설출판사
- 박상기, "형법각론(제7판)" (2008), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법각론" (2010), 홍문사
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2010), 박영사
- 이형국, "형법각론" (2007), 법문사
- 임웅, "형법각론" (2012)
- 정영일, "개정판 형법각론" (2008), 박영사
- 박성민, "특경법 제3조 제1항의 사기죄에 있어 이득액의 의미와 기준 - 대판 2007. 4. 19, 2005도7288 전원합의체 판결 -", 성균관법학, 21(1), pp.189~207 (2009), 법학연구소
- 형사특별법의 제정실태와 개선방안, "오영근", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1996)
- 안경옥, "특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률의 정비방안", 형사정책, 17(2), pp.9~32 (2005), 한국형사정책학회
- 안경옥, "특경법 제3조 제1항의 ‘이득액’ 평가에 대한 검토", 경희법학, 45(4), pp.261~285 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이상원, "횡령죄의 이득액과 가벌적 후행행위 <상>", 저스티스, (131), pp.173~201 (2012), 한국법학원[DOI]
- 이승현, "형법과 형사특별법의 법정형 정비방안, In 형사법개정연구자료집 Ⅱ" (2009), 법무부
- 허일태, "형사특별법의 형법편입 방안, In 형사법개정자료집" (2008), 법무부
