본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

절도죄의 객체로서 재물의 ‘재산적 가치’에 대한 검토

A review for the value of property as an object of larceny

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The article §329 of Criminal Act of Korea lay down like this; 'A person who steals another's property shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six years or by a fine not exceeding ten million won'. Larceny is one of the most common occurred crime and make out a most basic theory of property offences. The purpose of this study is to analysis the object of larceny. 2010. 2. 25. the Supreme Court of Korea made judgement that a free newspaper could be the object of larceny, while the Supreme Court did not gave a decision concrete reason. Also to relate with value of property as the object of larceny, there is not provision in the criminal law. So value of property as the object of larceny entrusts a interpretation with full argument. The property as 'a thing of value' should be divided active value, passive value, financial value, subjective value and exchange value etc. The most contentious issue of these is interpretation of passive value and subjective value. But there has been no judical precedent for this kind of case especially subjective value as of yet. In my judgement, if any thing has only subjective value, it is not property. The contents of this study is as follows; Ⅰ. A progress report of judgement Ⅱ. Raise a question Ⅲ. The relation of property and value Ⅳ. Review of judgement

Abstract

The article §329 of Criminal Act of Korea lay down like this; 'A person who steals another's property shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six years or by a fine not exceeding ten million won'. Larceny is one of the most common occurred crime and make out a most basic theory of property offences. The purpose of this study is to analysis the object of larceny. 2010. 2. 25. the Supreme Court of Korea made judgement that a free newspaper could be the object of larceny, while the Supreme Court did not gave a decision concrete reason. Also to relate with value of property as the object of larceny, there is not provision in the criminal law. So value of property as the object of larceny entrusts a interpretation with full argument. The property as 'a thing of value' should be divided active value, passive value, financial value, subjective value and exchange value etc. The most contentious issue of these is interpretation of passive value and subjective value. But there has been no judical precedent for this kind of case especially subjective value as of yet. In my judgement, if any thing has only subjective value, it is not property. The contents of this study is as follows; Ⅰ. A progress report of judgement Ⅱ. Raise a question Ⅲ. The relation of property and value Ⅳ. Review of judgement

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 권오걸, "형법각론" (2009), 형설출판사
  2. 김성돈, "형법각론(제 2 판)" (2009), 성균관대학교
  3. 김성천, "형법각론(제 2 판)" (2006), 동현출판사
  4. 김일수, "형법각론(제 7 판)" (2007), 박영사
  5. 배종대, "형법각론(제 6 전정판)" (2006), 홍문사
  6. 손동권, "형법각론(제 2 개정판)" (2006), 율곡출판사
  7. 오영근, "절도죄의 몇 가지 문제점", 석우 차용석 박사 화갑기념논문집(상), ~ (1994)
  8. 오영근, "형법각론(제 2 판)" (2010), 박영사
  9. 이영란, "형법학(각론강의)" (2008), 형설출판사
  10. 이재상, "형법각론(제 7 판)" (2010), 박영사
  11. 이주일, "절도죄의 보호법익에 대한 재검토", 외법논집, (28), pp.347~368 (2007), 법학연구소
  12. 이정원, "형법각론", 인터넷 공개판, ~ (2008)
  13. 임 웅, "형법각론(제 3 정판)" (2011), 법문사
  14. 임정호, "형법상 재산 개념에 관한 연구", 형사정책연구, 20(1), pp.499~518 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
  15. 정성근, "형법각론(제 3 판)" (2008), 삼지원
  16. 정영일, "형법각론(개정판)" (2008), 박영사
  17. 진계호, "형법각론(제 6 판)" (2008), 대왕사
  18. 탁희성, "재산죄의 객체로서 전자정보의 포섭가능성 및 그 한계 - 게임아이템과 사이버머니를 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 16(2), pp.141~170 (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
  19. 최선호, "절도죄의 객체에 관한 소고", 법학연구, (32), pp.377~398 (2008), 한국법학회
  20. 하태영, "한국 형법에 있어서 “재물개념”의 논쟁사-디지털시대의 새로운 법제이론과 형법 제349조 재물간주 규정의 개정", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.12~322 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
  21. 황인수, "재산죄에 있어서 재물개념에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.2007

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)