「AハBガVテアル」構文の特徴分析 -「AハBガVテアル」構文と「AハBガVラレテイル」構文との比較を中心に-
‘The analysis of the ‘Awha Bga Vtearu’ sentence-Mainly on the comparison with a ‘Awha Bga Vrareteiru’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I analyzed the meaning of ‘Awha Bga Vtearu’sentence and ‘Awha Bga Vrareteiru’ sentence with double subject structure. There were some precedent studies to compare ‘rareteiru’ and ‘tearu’, but The study about ‘rareteiru’ and ‘tearu’ to take the form of the double subject sentence structure into was not found. Therefore, in this paper, I paid attention to two sentences mentioned above and decided to compare and analyze it. As a result of analysis, it was ‘tearu’ sentence to be liked as a structure to express an effective aspect generally by a Japanese mother tongue speaker. but When the sentence with the double subject expressing an effective aspect is accompanied by, It was confirmed that the Japanese mother tongue speaker preferred ‘tearu’ to ‘rareteiru’. The next, it was confirmed that a noun not to express a position is more natural than a noun to express a position. Finally, it was said that the ‘Awha Bga Vtearu’ sentence was near a sentence expressing ‘characterization of A’ rather than ‘a position’ in the paper of Ooh(2009). And as a result of consideration, a sentence of the noun expressing a position was used for ‘A’ was felt more naturally, but the difference was not big.
Abstract
In this paper, I analyzed the meaning of ‘Awha Bga Vtearu’sentence and ‘Awha Bga Vrareteiru’ sentence with double subject structure. There were some precedent studies to compare ‘rareteiru’ and ‘tearu’, but The study about ‘rareteiru’ and ‘tearu’ to take the form of the double subject sentence structure into was not found. Therefore, in this paper, I paid attention to two sentences mentioned above and decided to compare and analyze it. As a result of analysis, it was ‘tearu’ sentence to be liked as a structure to express an effective aspect generally by a Japanese mother tongue speaker. but When the sentence with the double subject expressing an effective aspect is accompanied by, It was confirmed that the Japanese mother tongue speaker preferred ‘tearu’ to ‘rareteiru’. The next, it was confirmed that a noun not to express a position is more natural than a noun to express a position. Finally, it was said that the ‘Awha Bga Vtearu’ sentence was near a sentence expressing ‘characterization of A’ rather than ‘a position’ in the paper of Ooh(2009). And as a result of consideration, a sentence of the noun expressing a position was used for ‘A’ was felt more naturally, but the difference was not big.
참고문헌 (30)
- 安藤節子, "コーパスに見るテアル表現の意味用法と共起動詞: 日本語教育", 学習の観点から, 2012, pp.(8), 1~13[DOI]
- 李京保, "シテアル形に関する一考察", 東京外国語大学日本研究教育年報, 8, pp.1~19 (2004), 東京外国語大学日本過程·留学生課共
- 李光秀, "日本語「てある」文의 構造", 日語日文學硏究, 38, pp.115~138 (2001), 韓国日語日文学会
- 浦木貴和, "「テアル」構文に関する考察", 日本語·日本文化研究, 16, pp.123~132 (2006), 大阪外大日本語講座
- 浦木貴和, "テ形節とスケール構造からみた「テアル」構文の意味分析", 日本語·日本文化研究, 20, pp.51~64 (2010), 大阪外大日本語講座
- 呉幸栄, "してある」と「しておく", の接近: 《第2「してある」動詞》との対応を中心に日本文学研究, (51), pp.114~129 (2012), 大東文化大学日本文学会
- 神永正史, "「テアル」構文の動詞構成: 存在文との近さから", 筑波日本語研究, 13, pp.33~50 (2008), 筑波大学大学院日本語学研究室
- 杉村泰, "形式と意味の研究-「テアル」構文の2種類", 日本語教育, 91, pp.61~72 (1996), 日本語教育学会
- 杉村泰, "意思性のない「テアル」構文について", 言語文化論集, XXV(1), pp.159~174 (2002)
- 齋藤茂, "「テアル」構文と対象の格表示", 言語と文明, 6, pp.113~136 (2008), 麗澤大学大学院言語教育研究科
- 鈴木泉子, "「テアル」構文と受動表現との使い分け-結果を基に動作が行われたと推論することによる制約-", 麗澤大学紀要, 90, pp.131~154 (2010), 麗澤大学
- 鈴木泉子, "「テアル」構文について-モノの存在と効果の存在-", 津田塾大学紀要, 32, pp.129~139 (2002)
- 鈴木泉子, "格交替における意味の関与-「テアル」構文を足掛かりとして-", 津田塾大学紀要, 36, pp.183~196 (2004)
- 張賢善, "「てある」に関する一考察-「∼ている」との関係において-", 日本研究教育年報, 12, pp.1~19 (2008), 東京外国語大学
- 原沢伊都夫, "「∼てある」文と「∼ておく」文の違いについて:文法構造の観点から", 言語·地域文化研究, 16, pp.203~213 (2010), 東京外国語大学大学院
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味" (1984), くろしお出版
- 中俣尚己, "日本語教育文法のための多様なアプローチ" (2011), ひつじ書房
- 富田美知子, "有対他動詞の自動詞表現と受身表現", 人文論究, 56, pp.161~176 (1993), 北海道教育大学函館人文学会
- 益岡隆志, "「ーてある」構文の文法", 言語研究, 86, pp.190~191 (1984)
- 原沢伊都夫, "テアル形の意味-テイル形との関係において", 言語, 28(9), pp.13~24 (1998)
- 原沢伊都夫, "テアルの意味分析-意図性の観点から-", 日本語文法, 5(1), pp.20~38 (2005)
- 副島健, "シテアル再考--他動性の観点から", 留学生教育, 6, pp.7~23 (2009), 琉球大学留学生センター
- 배은정, "「Aハ(ガ)BガVサレル」型受身文と「Aハ(ガ)BヲVサレル」型受身文との比較 -大主語構文としての？性を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 62(2), pp.231~250 (2007), 한국일어일문학회
- 배은정, "韓国人日本語学習者と日本語母語話者における 結果相を表す表現の認識度の違いについて -AガVラレテイル文とAガVテアル文を中心に-", 일어일문학, (40), pp.73~90 (2008), 대한일어일문학회
- 배은정, "結果及び状態を表す「AガVテアル｣文と 「AガVラレテイル｣文の比較分析", 日本語文學, 1(39), pp.49~69 (2008), 한국일본어문학회
- 裵銀貞, "結果相を表す「AハBヲVサレテイル」型受身文と「AハBガVサレテイル」型受身文との比較", 일어일문학, (37), pp.37~51 (2008), 대한일어일문학회
- 배은정, "「書く」・「置く」を述語とする「AガVラレテイル」文と 「AガVテアル文」の意味特徴の比較 -日本語教育の側面から-", 일어일문학, (42), pp.137~157 (2009), 대한일어일문학회
- 배은정, "韓国人日本語学習者における「テアル」構文の理解度分析-中級以上の学習者を対象に-", 일본어교육연구, (26), pp.91~110 (2013), 한국일어교육학회
- 배은정, "能動型「∼テアル」」構文と「∼テオク」構文との比較-共起環境を中心に-", 일어일문학, (60), pp.59~75 (2013), 대한일어일문학회
- 山崎恵, "「∼ておく」と「てある」の関連性について", 日本語教育, 88, pp.13~24 (1996)