日・韓両言語における「受動動詞＋テアル」構文の認識度の違いについて
A difference in recognition of "passive verb + ‘Tearu’ syntax in Japanese and Korean languages
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I conducted a comparative analysis on the difference in perception of the naturalness of "passive verb + tearul" syntax in both Japanese and Korean languages, and the following results were obtained. [1] It was confirmed that the degree of naturalness of the "passive verb + tearul" structure observed by Korean Japanese learners was lower than that of Japanese native speakers. In addition, the degree of naturalness with each type indicates the highest score for Type B, followed by Type A and Type C, respectively. [2] In the case of Japanese native speakers, the degree of naturalness tended to be higher as the place nouns appeared above the sentence. But Such trends were not apparent for Korean learners of Japanese. [3] In the case of Korean learners of Japanese., the degree of naturalness was much higher when the target verb variant was used as the predicate, and the order of the placement verb, target unchanged verb, and physical verb verb . [4] It was found that the results of the judgments of naturalness differ greatly between a person who specialized in Japanese Studies and a person who is not specialized in Japanese Studies.
Abstract
In this paper, I conducted a comparative analysis on the difference in perception of the naturalness of "passive verb + tearul" syntax in both Japanese and Korean languages, and the following results were obtained. [1] It was confirmed that the degree of naturalness of the "passive verb + tearul" structure observed by Korean Japanese learners was lower than that of Japanese native speakers. In addition, the degree of naturalness with each type indicates the highest score for Type B, followed by Type A and Type C, respectively. [2] In the case of Japanese native speakers, the degree of naturalness tended to be higher as the place nouns appeared above the sentence. But Such trends were not apparent for Korean learners of Japanese. [3] In the case of Korean learners of Japanese., the degree of naturalness was much higher when the target verb variant was used as the predicate, and the order of the placement verb, target unchanged verb, and physical verb verb . [4] It was found that the results of the judgments of naturalness differ greatly between a person who specialized in Japanese Studies and a person who is not specialized in Japanese Studies.
참고문헌 (21)
- 安藤節子, "コーパスに見るテアル表現の意味用法と共起動詞-日本語教育", 学習の観点から-, 2012, pp.8, 1~3[DOI]
- 浦木貴和, "テアル構文に関する考察", 日本語・日本文化研究, 16, pp.123~132 (2006), 大阪外大日本語講座
- 浦木貴和, "テ形節とスケール構造からみたテアル構文の意味分析", 日本語・日本文化研究, 20, pp.51~64 (2010), 大阪外大日本語講座
- 神永正史, "テアル構文の動詞構成: 存在文との近さから", 筑波日本語研究, 13, pp.33~50 (2008), 筑波大学大学院日本語学研究室
- 김수영, "日韓両言語の補助動詞「てある」「ておく」と「아", 어 놓다」 「아, 일어일문학, pp.2018, (79)[DOI]
- 杉村泰, "形式と意味の研究-テアル構文の2種類", 日本語教育, 91(6), pp.61~72 (1996), 日本語教育学会
- 杉村泰, "意志性のないテアル構文について", 言語文化論集, XXV(1), pp.159~174 (2002)
- 齋藤茂, "テアル構文と対象の格表示", 言語と文明, 6, pp.113~136 (2009), 麗澤大学大学院言語教育研究科
- 鈴木泉子, "テアル構文について-モノの存在と効果の存在-", 津田塾大学紀要, 32, pp.129~139 (2002)
- 鈴木泉子, "格交替における意味の関与-テアル構文を足掛かりとして-", 津田塾大学紀要, 36 (2004), 津田塾大学
- 張賢善, "～てある」文と「～ておく」文の違いについて:文法構造の観点から", 言語・地域文化研究, 16, pp.203~213 (2010), 東京外国語大学大学院
- 原沢伊都夫, "テアルの意味分析-意図性の観点から-", 日本語文法, 5(1), pp.20~38 (2005), 日本語文法学会
- 森田良幸, "動詞の意味論的文法研究" (1994), 明治書院
- 福島建作, "日本語のアスペクト体系の研究" (2007), ひつじ書房
- 福島建作, "シテアル再考--他動性の観点から", 留学生教育, 6, pp.7~23 (2009), 琉球大学留学生センター
- 배은정, "結果を表す「受動動詞＋テアル」構文の 出現様相の分析", 일본근대학연구, (60), pp.7~26 (2018), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
- 배은정, "日本人母語話者における 「受動動詞＋テアル」構文の認識度について", 일본근대학연구, (64), pp.35~54 (2019), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
- 益岡隆志, "「ーてある」構文の文法", 言語研究, 86 (1984)
- 益岡隆志, "命題の文法" (1987), くろしお出版
- 森田良幸, "動詞の意味論的文法研究" (1994), 明治書院
- 森貞, "他動詞受動形＋テアル」構文について", 福井工業高等専門学校研究紀要, 35, pp.21~26 (2001), 福井工業高等専門学校